不同社会情境中大学生的身份期望对行为选择的影响

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.05.010

心理研究

2023, Vol. 16

Issue (5): 467-473 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.05.010

学校心理研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

不同社会情境中大学生的身份期望对行为选择的影响

海敏¹, 田彦英¹, 康廷虎², 王勇慧¹

1 陕西师范大学心理学院,西安 710062;
2 西北师范大学心理学院,兰州 730070

The influence of status expectation on behavior choice among college students in different social situations

HAI Min¹, TIAN Yanying¹, KANG Tinghu², WANG Yonghui¹

1 School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062;
2 School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (3)

全文: PDF (944 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要身份现象是一种表征个体独特存在于社会情景中的方式,反映了个体间的社会联结。在不同的社会情景中,个体会拥有不同的身份。这种不同身份的转换引发了个体对身份期望的知觉,进而影响着相应身份的行为举止。鉴于此,本研究通过3个实验试图探究大学生在不同情境中的身份期望及其如何影响行为选择。实验1采用2（身份类别：象征性vs具体性）×2（学业表现：较好 vs 较差）的被试内实验设计,探讨了大学生的学业表现是否影响着身份期望;实验2采用2（身份类别：象征性 vs具体性）×2（工作表现：较好 vs 较差）×2（人际关系：融洽vs淡漠）的被试内实验设计,探讨了大学生的工作表现与人际关系如何相互作用影响身份期望;实验3采用3（威望：较低vs一般vs较高）×3（职称：讲师vs副教授vs教授）的被试内实验设计,探讨了大学生的身份期望如何影响行为选择。结果显示：大学生的学业/工作表现与人际关系影响着身份期望;相比具体性身份,大学生更期望象征性身份并且象征性身份更大程度地影响着行为选择。这些结果表明：在不同社会情境中,中国大学生拥有不同的身份期望,这些身份期望影响着大学生的行为选择。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	海敏
	田彦英
	康廷虎
	王勇慧

关键词 ：大学生, 社会情境, 身份期望, 行为选择

基金资助:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2019TS135)、2022年度陕西高校学生工作研究课题（2022XKT07）、陕西省体育彩票管理中心资助项目（横20220190）

通讯作者: 王勇慧,女,教授,博士生导师。Email：wyonghui@snnu.edu.cn

引用本文:

海敏, 田彦英, 康廷虎, 王勇慧. 不同社会情境中大学生的身份期望对行为选择的影响[J]. 心理研究, 2023, 16(5): 467-473.
HAI Min, TIAN Yanying, KANG Tinghu, WANG Yonghui. The influence of status expectation on behavior choice among college students in different social situations. Psychological Research, 2023, 16(5): 467-473.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.05.010 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2023/V16/I5/467

[1] 陈满, 王小婷, 段继鹏. (2019). 群体情境中行为的发生概率对行为预测的影响.心理研究, 12(4), 324-333.
[2] 康廷虎, 海敏. (2013). “身份”是打开“爱”之门的金钥匙.中国社会科学报, 9(2).
[3] 林春婷, 蒋柯. (2019). 风险决策中框架效应研究的最新趋势.心理研究, 12(4), 334-339.
[4] 王力平. (2007). 身份的社会资本属性及其功能. 西北师范大学硕士学位论文.
[5] 王啸天, 陈文平, 段锦云. (2019). 中国背景下员工的面子观及其对建言和沉默行为的影响.心理研究, 12(3), 233-244.
[6] 吴小勇, 杨红升, 程蕾, 黄希庭. (2011). 身份凸显性:启动自我的开关.心理科学进展, 19(5), 712-722.
[7] 许科, 孙娟. (2013). 临时团队成员身份同质性对合作绩效的影响机制.心理研究, 6(1), 42-49.
[8] Anderson C., John O. P., Keltner D., & Kring A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81(1), 116-132.
[9] Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 295-298.
[10] Berger J., Cohen B. P., & Zelditch M. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction.American Sociological Review, 37(3), 241-255.
[11] Bingham J. B., Oldroyd J. B., Thompson J. A., Bednar J. S., & Bunderson J. S. (2014). Status and the true believer: The impact of psychological contracts on social status attributions of friendship and influence.Organization Science, 25(1), 73-92.
[12] Binning, K. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2012). Understanding status as a social resource: Handbook of social resource theory.
[13] Binning K. R., Unzueta M. M., Huo Y. J., & Molina L. E. (2009). The interpretation of multiracial status and its relation to social engagement and psychological well‐being.Journal of Social Issues, 65(1), 35-49.
[14] Cast, A. D., & Burke, S. (1999). Does the self conform to the views of others?Social Psychology Quarterly, 62(1), 68-82.
[15] Cecilia, R. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics.Social Forces, 70(2), 367-386.
[16] Eysenck, H. J. (1994). Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality. Vol. 2. Reproductive and interpersonal aspects of dominance and status: Westport CT, Praeger (1994). Hardback. 1-261. ISBN 0-275-04526-X-ScienceDirect.Personality & Individual Differences, 20(2), 277-278.
[17] Fershtman C., Mu Rphy K. M., & Weiss Y. (1996). Social status, education, and growth.Journal of Political Economy, 104(1), 108-132.
[18] Fershtman, C., & Weiss, Y. (1993). Social status, culture and economic performance.Economic Journal, 103(6), 945-959.
[19] Ho, D. Y. (1976). On the concept of face.American Journal of Sociology, 81, 867-884.
[20] Huberman B. A., Loch C. H., & Onculer A. (2004). Status as a valued resource.Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(1), 103-114.
[21] Huo Y. J., Binning K. R., & Molina L. E. (2010). Testing an integrative model of respect: Implications for social engagement and well-being.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 200-212.
[22] Kraus M. W., Piff P. K., & Keltner D. (2011). Social class as culture: The convergence of resources and rank in the social realm.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 246-250.
[23] Li, N. (1990). Social resources and social mobility: A structural theory of status attainment.Social Mobility & Social Structure, 94(3), 247-271.
[24] Liew, Sook L., Yina, Han, Shihui, Aziz, Z., & Lisa. (2011). Who's afraid of the boss: Cultural differences in social hierarchies modulate self-face recognition in Chinese and Americans.PLoS One, 6, 1-8.
[25] Loch C. H., Huberman B. A., & Stout S. (2000). Status competition and performance in work groups.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(1), 35-55.
[26] Ridgeway, C. L., & Erickson, K. G. (2000). Creating and spreading status beliefs.American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 579-615.
[27] Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity.Personality & Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88-106.
[28] Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory.Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237.
[29] Stets, J. E., & Cast, A. D. (2005). Verifying and maintaining social actors: The role of resources.
[30] Thye, S. R. (2000). A status value theory of power in exchange relations.American Sociological Review, 65(3), 407-432.
[31] Woo M., Austin S. B., Williams D. R., & Bennett G. G. (2011). Reconceptualizing the measurement of multiracial status for health research in the United States.Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 8(1), 25-36.
[32] Zvolensky M. J., Paulus D. J., Bakhshaie J., Garza M., Manning K., Lemaire C.,.. Ochoa-Perez M. (2018). Anxiety sensitivity and age: Roles in understanding subjective social status among low income adult Latinos in primary care.Journal of Immigrant & Minority Health, 20(3), 632-640.