二语书写中的运动——语义耦合效应

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2025.03.003

心理研究

2025, Vol. 18

Issue (3): 213-220 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2025.03.003

基础研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

二语书写中的运动——语义耦合效应

白亚停^1,2, 秦楠³, 何文广¹

1 曲阜师范大学心理学院,曲阜 273165;
2 中国人民大学心理学系,北京 100872;
3 山东农业大学大学生心理学教育中心,泰安 271018

The motor-semantics coupling effect in second language writing

BAI Yating^1,2, QIN Nan³, HE Wenguang¹

1 School of Psychology, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165;
2 Department of Psychology, Renmin University, Beijing 100872;
3 Mental Health Education Center, Shandong Agricultural University Taian 271018

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (6)

全文: PDF (794 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要采用按键书写范式,首次考查了汉（L1）-英（L2）双语被试按键书写过程中词汇语义与感知运动系统间的耦合效应。结果发现：（1） L1结果显示,在运动计划（FLL）阶段,刺激类型效应不显著,但在运动执行（WWL）阶段表现为干扰作用,该发现支持语言具身认知效应假设;（2） L2结果显示,在FLL和WWL阶段,动词书写整体表现出促进作用,但较之于非手部动作动词（nMaVs）,书写手部动作动词（MaVs）则表现为干扰作用,该发现支持手部动作神经网络动态语言具身理论模型假设;（3）语言熟练度会影响书写计划和书写执行过程,但不影响运动-语义耦合效应模式。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	白亚停
	秦楠
	何文广

关键词 ：书写产出, 运动-语义耦合, 双语, 具身认知

基金资助:国家社科基金一般项目（24BYY117）

通讯作者: 何文广,男,教授,博士生导师。Email：hewg@qfnu.edu.cn

引用本文:

白亚停, 秦楠, 何文广. 二语书写中的运动——语义耦合效应[J]. 心理研究, 2025, 18(3): 213-220.
BAI Yating, QIN Nan, HE Wenguang. The motor-semantics coupling effect in second language writing. Psychological Research, 2025, 18(3): 213-220.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2025.03.003 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2025/V18/I3/213

[1] 王成, 尤文平, 张清芳.(2012).书写产生过程的认知机制.心理科学进展, 20(10), 1560-1572.
[2] Afonso O., Suárez‐Coalla P., Cuetos F., Ibáñez A., Sedeño L., & García A. M. (2019). The embodied penman: Effector‐specific motor-language integration during handwriting.Cognitive Science, 43(7), e12767.
[3] Bergen B., Lau T. T., Narayan S., Stojanovic D., & Wheeler K. (2012). Body part representations in verbal semantics.Memory & Cognition, 38(7), 969-981.
[4] Dalla Volta R., Fabbri-Destro M., Gentilucci M., & Avanzini P. (2014). Spatiotemporal dynamics during processing of abstract and concrete verbs: An ERP study.Neuropsychologia, 61, 163-174.
[5] Diefenbach C., Rieger M., Massen C., & Prinz W. (2013). Action-sentence compatibility: The role of action effects and timing.Frontiers in Psychology, 4(4), 272.
[6] Fargier R., Menoret M., Boulenger V., Nazir T. A., & Paulignan Y. (2012). Grasp it loudly！ Supporting actions with semantically congruent spoken action words.PLoS One, 7, e30663.
[7] Galen, G. V. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory.Human Movement Science, 10(2-3), 165-191.
[8] García, A. M., & Ibáñez, A. (2016a). A touch with words: Dynamic synergies between manual actions and language. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 59-95.
[9] García, A. M., & Ibánez, A. (2016b). Hands typing what hands do: Action-semantic integration dynamics throughout written verb production. Cognition, 149, 56-66.
[10] García-Marco, Morera Y., D Beltrán, Vega, M. D., Herrera E., & Sedeño,et al. (2019). Negation markers inhibit motor routines during typing of manual action verbs.Cognition, 182, 286-293.
[11] Kaschak, M. P., & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Temporal dynamics of the action-sentence compatibility effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,(Hove) 61, 883-895.
[12] Kogan B., Garciá-Marco E., Birba A., Cortes C., Melloni M., Ibáñez A., & Garciá A. M. (2020). How words ripple through bilingual hands: Motor-language coupling during L1 and L2 writing.Neuropsychologia, 146, 107563.
[13] Pacini, A. M., & Barnard, P. J. (2021). Exocentric coding of the mapping between valence and regions of space: Implications for embodied cognition.Acta Psychologica, 214(4), 103264.
[14] Spadacenta S., Gallese V., Fragola M., & Mirabella G. (2014). Modulation of arm reaching movements during processing of arm/hand-related action verbs with and without emotional connotation.PLoS One, 9, e104349.
[15] Tomasino B., Werner C. J., Weiss P. H., & Fink G. R. (2007). Stimulus properties matter more than perspective: An fMRI study of mental imagery and silent reading of action phrases.Neuroimage, 36, 128-141.
[16] Vukovic, N. (2013). When words get physical: Evidence for proficiency-modulated somatotopic motor interference during second language comprehension.Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 35(35).