|
|
|
| The influence of supervisory styles on graduate students' future work self-salience：The mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of interaction frequency |
| SUN Jianqun1,2, TIAN Xiaoming2,3, YANG Wenyuan4, SU Huijing4, LI Rui5 |
1 School of Business, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009;
2 USTS Think Tank for Urban Development, Suzhou University of Science and Technology,Suzhou 215009;
3 School of Education, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009;
4 School of Education, Soochow University, Suzhou 215009;
5 School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230000 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the resource conservation theory, this paper examined the influence of mentor supportive supervision and abusive supervision on graduate students' future work self-salience, and discussed the mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of interaction frequency. Based on hierarchical regression analysis of 922 graduate students' data, the results showed that ： （1） The supportive supervision positively affected the graduate students' future work self-salience, while the abusive supervision negatively affected the graduate students' future work self-salience; （2） The supportive supervision promoted the future work self-salience by affecting the psychological capital of graduate students,while the abusive supervision inhibited the future work self-salience by affecting the psychological capital of graduate students; （3） The frequency of interaction between teachers and students could enhance the promoting effect of supportive supervision on psychological capital, and strengthen the mediating effect of psychological capital between supportive supervision and future work self-salience, but for abusive supervision, this moderating effect didn't exist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈玥, 张峰铭. (2022). 导师支持,工作满意度与博士后职业前景:基于nature2020全球博士后调查数据的中介效应分析.中国高教研究, 7(8), 90-96.
[2] 弗雷德·卢森斯等著, 李超平译. (2008). 心理资本:打造人的竞争优势. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 221-222.
[3] 付雪娇, 李俊凯. (2020). 地方高校农科类研究生就业的困境与对策. 教育研究, 3(8), 29-31.
[4] 古继宝, 王茜, 吴剑琳. (2013). 导师指导模式对研究生创造力的影响研究:基于内部-外部动机理论的分析.中国高教研究, (1), 45-50.
[5] 候亮, 刘光建, 吴伟, 丁桂凤. (2019). 大学生谦卑行为与未来工作自我清晰度:有调节的中介模型.心理与行为研究, 17(5), 675-682.
[6] 李澄锋, 陈洪捷. (2021). 主动选择导师何以重要:选择导师的主动性对博士生指导效果的调节效应.高等教育研究, 42(4), 73-83.
[7] 李宗波, 彭翠, 陈世民, 荣莹. (2019). 辱虐型指导方式对科研创造力的影响: 科研焦虑与性别一致性的作用.中国临床心理学杂志, 27(1), 158-162.
[8] 刘军, 廖振宇, 高中华. (2013). 高校导师辱虐型指导方式对研究生自我效能的影响机制研究. 管理学报, 10(6), 839-846+861.
[9] 刘志. (2020). 研究生导师和学生关系问题何在:基于深度访谈的分析.教育研究, 41(9), 104-116.
[10] 苏荟, 白玲, 张继伟. (2021). 导师家长式指导风格对研究生创新行为的影响研究.学位与研究生教育, (6), 57-66.
[11] 徐洋洋, 林新奇, 习怡衡. (2019). 孤独的员工何时会更投入:未来工作自我清晰度和变革型领导的干预效应研究.南开管理评论, 22(5), 79-89.
[12] 尹奎, 孙健敏, 邢璐, 杨夕瑾. (2016). 研究生科研角色认同对科研创造力的影响:导师包容性领导,师门差错管理氛围的作用.心理发展与教育, 32(5), 557-564.
[13] 张晨宇, 于文卿, 姚秋昱. (2022). 导师自主支持对工科研究生创新行为的影响:基于12所“双一流”建设高校的调查.学位与研究生教育, (10), 42-48.
[14] 赵磊磊, 姜蓓佳. (2020). 导师支持对学术型博士生学术适应的影响:基于江浙沪皖16所高校的调查研究.中国高教研究, (8), 56-61.
[15] 张敏, 叶茂林, 彭坚, 陈宇帅. (2016). 未来工作自我:概念,测量及其相关研究.心理科学进展, 24(5), 794-803.
[16] Armeli S., Eisenberger R., Fasolo P., & Lynch P. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: The moderating influence of socio-emotional needs.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 288-297.
[17] Aryee S., Sun L., Chen Z., & Debrah Y. (2008). Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure.Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 393-411.
[18] Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
[19] Cai Z. J., Guan Y. J., Li H. Y., Shi W., Guo K., Liu Y., Li Q. L., Han X., Jiang P., Fang Z., & Hua H. J. (2015). Self-esteem and proactive personality as predictors of future work self and career adaptability: An examination of mediating and moderating processes.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 86-94.
[20] Devine, K., & Hunter, K. H. (2017). PhD student emotional exhaustion: The role of supportive supervision and self-presentation behaviours.Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 335-344.
[21] Fan L., Mahmood M., & Uddin M. A. (2019). Supportive Chinese supervisor, innovative international students: A social exchange theory perspective.Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(1), 101-115.
[22] Guan Y. J., Guo Y., Bond M. H.,……Ye L. H.(2014). New job market entrants' future work self, career adaptability and job search outcomes: Examining mediating and moderating models.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(1), 136-145.
[23] Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.The American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
[24] Jose A., Salinas P., Maria L. R., Alina R., & Emma M. (2019). Actions and techniques in supervision, mentorships and tutorial activities to foster doctoral study success: A scoping literature review.International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 21-31.
[25] Kim S. L., Lee S., & Yun S. (2016). Abusive supervision, knowledge sharing, and individual factors: A conservation of resources perspective.Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(6), 1106-1120.
[26] Li Z., Yang Y., Zhang X., & Lyu Z. (2021). Impact of future work self on employee workplace wellbeing: A self-determination perspective.Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 656874.
[27] Luthans F., Avolio B. J., Walumbwa F. O., & Li W. (2005). The psychological capital of Chinese workers: Exploring the relationship with performance.Management and Organization Review, 1(02), 247-269.
[28] Luthans F., Luthans K., & Luthans B. (2004). Positive psychological captial: Going beyond human and social capital.Business Horizons, 47, 45-50.
[29] Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage.Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143-160.
[30] Luthans F., Youssef C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[31] Mathieu, J. E., & Farr, J. L. (1991). Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 127-133.
[32] Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs.Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159-1168.
[33] Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work.Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
[34] Overall N. C., Deane K. L., & Peterson E. R. (2011). Promoting doctoral students' research self-efficacy: Combining academic guidance with autonomy support.Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 791-805.
[35] Paglis L. L., Green S. G., & Bauer T. N. (2006). Does advisor mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes.Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451-476.
[36] Preacher K. J., Curran P. J., & Bauer D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437-448.
[37] Preacher K. J., Rucker D. D., & Hayes A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescription.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227.
[38] Qin X., Huang M., Johnson R. E., Hu Q., & Ju D. (2018). The short-lived benefits of abusive supervisory behavior for actors: An investigation of recovery and work engagement.Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1951-1975.
[39] Scholz U., Gutierrez Dona B., Sud S., & Schwarzer R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries.European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242-251.
[40] Stinglhamber, F., & Vandenberghe, C. (2003). Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: A longitudinal study.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(3), 251-270.
[41] Story J. S. P., Youssef C. M., Luthans F., Barbuto J. E., & Bovaird J. (2013). Contagion effect of global leaders' positive psychological capital on followers: Does distance and quality of relationship matter?International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(13), 2534-2553.
[42] Strauss K., Griffin M. A., & Parker S. K. (2012). Future work selves: How salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors.Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 580-598.
[43] Taber, B. J., & Blankemeyer, M. (2015). Future work self and career adaptability in the prediction of proactive career behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 20-27.
[44] Walumbwa F. O., Luthans F., Avey J. B., & Oke A. (2011). Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 4-24.
[45] Zhang C., Hirschi A., Herrmann A., Wei J., & Zhang J. (2017). The future work self and calling: The mediational role of life meaning.Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(4), 977-991.
[46] Zhang Y., Liao J., Yan Y., & Guo Y. (2014). Newcomers' future work selves, perceived supervisor support, and proactive socialization in Chinese organizations.Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 42(9), 1457-1472.
[47] Zhang Z., Yu X.,& Liu, X.(2022). Do I decide my career? Linking career stress, career exploration, and future work self to career planning or indecision. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997984.
[48] Zhao X., Lynch J. G., & Chen Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis.Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. |
|
|
|
