|
|
The motor-semantics coupling effect in second language writing |
BAI Yating1,2, QIN Nan3, HE Wenguang1 |
1 School of Psychology, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165; 2 Department of Psychology, Renmin University, Beijing 100872; 3 Mental Health Education Center, Shandong Agricultural University Taian 271018 |
|
|
Abstract The speed of our hand movements can be affected by concurrent processing of manual action verbs. While this phenomenon is well established for native languages (L1), it remains underexplored in foreign language (L2). In this paper, we used “action semantics in typing” paradigm, which allowed to time keystroke operations during word typing. 79 Chinese-English bilinguals participated in the study and the results showed that: (1) L1 results showed that the effect of stimulus type was not significant in the FLL stage, but there was an interference effect in the WWL stage, which supported the hypothesis of embodied language cognition effect; (2) L2 results showed that in the FLL and WWL stages, the overall performance of verbs writing was primed, but the writing of manual action verbs (MaVs) were interfered compared with non-manual action verbs (nMaVs), which supported the hypothesis of HANDLE model; (3) Language proficiency affected writing planning and writing execution, but did not affect the motor-semantics coupling effect.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 王成, 尤文平, 张清芳.(2012).书写产生过程的认知机制.心理科学进展, 20(10), 1560-1572. [2] Afonso O., Suárez‐Coalla P., Cuetos F., Ibáñez A., Sedeño L., & García A. M. (2019). The embodied penman: Effector‐specific motor-language integration during handwriting.Cognitive Science, 43(7), e12767. [3] Bergen B., Lau T. T., Narayan S., Stojanovic D., & Wheeler K. (2012). Body part representations in verbal semantics.Memory & Cognition, 38(7), 969-981. [4] Dalla Volta R., Fabbri-Destro M., Gentilucci M., & Avanzini P. (2014). Spatiotemporal dynamics during processing of abstract and concrete verbs: An ERP study.Neuropsychologia, 61, 163-174. [5] Diefenbach C., Rieger M., Massen C., & Prinz W. (2013). Action-sentence compatibility: The role of action effects and timing.Frontiers in Psychology, 4(4), 272. [6] Fargier R., Menoret M., Boulenger V., Nazir T. A., & Paulignan Y. (2012). Grasp it loudly! Supporting actions with semantically congruent spoken action words.PLoS One, 7, e30663. [7] Galen, G. V. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory.Human Movement Science, 10(2-3), 165-191. [8] García, A. M., & Ibáñez, A. (2016a). A touch with words: Dynamic synergies between manual actions and language. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 59-95. [9] García, A. M., & Ibánez, A. (2016b). Hands typing what hands do: Action-semantic integration dynamics throughout written verb production. Cognition, 149, 56-66. [10] García-Marco, Morera Y., D Beltrán, Vega, M. D., Herrera E., & Sedeño,et al. (2019). Negation markers inhibit motor routines during typing of manual action verbs.Cognition, 182, 286-293. [11] Kaschak, M. P., & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Temporal dynamics of the action-sentence compatibility effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,(Hove) 61, 883-895. [12] Kogan B., Garciá-Marco E., Birba A., Cortes C., Melloni M., Ibáñez A., & Garciá A. M. (2020). How words ripple through bilingual hands: Motor-language coupling during L1 and L2 writing.Neuropsychologia, 146, 107563. [13] Pacini, A. M., & Barnard, P. J. (2021). Exocentric coding of the mapping between valence and regions of space: Implications for embodied cognition.Acta Psychologica, 214(4), 103264. [14] Spadacenta S., Gallese V., Fragola M., & Mirabella G. (2014). Modulation of arm reaching movements during processing of arm/hand-related action verbs with and without emotional connotation.PLoS One, 9, e104349. [15] Tomasino B., Werner C. J., Weiss P. H., & Fink G. R. (2007). Stimulus properties matter more than perspective: An fMRI study of mental imagery and silent reading of action phrases.Neuroimage, 36, 128-141. [16] Vukovic, N. (2013). When words get physical: Evidence for proficiency-modulated somatotopic motor interference during second language comprehension.Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 35(35). |
|
|
|