|
|
|
| Bidirectional and unbalance of metaphorical mapping in conscious and unconscious processing |
| JIA Yongping1, XUE Lingling1, WU Yunpeng2, LIU Guixiong1, CAO Ying3 |
1 Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Mental Development and Learning Science, School of Psychology, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830017;
2 School of Teacher Education, Huzhou University,Huzhou 313000;
3 Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610068 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The present study used the paradigm of Recognition Without Cued Recall （RWCR） to explore the conscious and unconscious processing mechanisms in metaphor cognition, as well as the directional and balance of metaphor mapping. Experiment 1 of this study explored the mapping from the source domain to the target domain at the conscious and unconscious levels, and experiment 2 studied the mapping from the target domain to the source domain. The results of experiment 1 and experiment 2 were further compared to explore the balance of metaphorical mapping. The study found that： （1） In experiment 1, with the source domain as the cue word, the recollection accuracy of the learned target domain was significantly higher than that of the unlearned one. The familiarity scores of the learned target domain under recollection error condition were significantly higher than those of the unlearned target domain. （2） In experiment 2, with the target domain as the cue word, the recollection accuracy of the learned source domain was significantly higher than that of the unlearned one. Under the condition of recall error, the learned source domain familiarity score was significantly higher than that of the unlearned. （3） In terms of recollection, the recollection accuracy rate of experiment 1 was significantly higher than that of experiment 2. In terms of familiarity, there was no significant difference in familiarity scores between the two experiments. These results suggest that metaphorical mapping is bidirectional in both recollection and familiarity （conscious and unconscious）. At the level of consciousness, the mapping of metaphor is unbalanced, and the mapping power from the source domain to the target domain is strong. At the unconscious level, metaphorical mapping may be balanced. It provides empirical evidence for further exploring the mapping mechanism of metaphor in conscious and unconscious processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 范琪. (2013). 隐喻认知加工机制的事件相关电位(ERPs)研究.江苏师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 39(2), 65-71.
[2] 范淑云. (2002). 汉语中与人体部位相关语词的隐喻研究. 南京师范大学硕士学位论文.
[3] 贺晓玲, 陈俊. (2020). 3~5岁幼儿权力概念多重隐喻的认知发展.心理学报, 52(2), 149-161.
[4] 贾宁, 蒋高芳. (2016). 道德概念垂直空间隐喻的心理现实性及双向映射.心理发展与教育, 32(2), 158-165.
[5] 贾永萍, 周楚, 李林, 郭秀艳. (2016). 汉字的无线索回忆再认效应:重复学习和重复测验的作用.心理学报, 48(2), 111-120.
[6] 廖秋盈. (2019). 道德概念黑白隐喻理解中的映射:双向性及不平衡性. 云南师范大学硕士学位论文.
[7] 刘源, 梁南元, 王德进, 张社英, 杨铁鹰, 揭春雨, 孙伟. (1990). 现代汉语常用词词频词典. 北京: 宇航出版社.
[8] 刘泽军, 刘伟. (2022). 一体化促进联结记忆的作用机制:熟悉性和回想加工.心理科学进展, 30(10), 2240-2253.
[9] 鲁忠义, 郭少鹏, 蒋泽亮. (2017a). 道德概念大小隐喻的心理现实性及映射关系.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (2), 70-78.
[10] 鲁忠义, 贾利宁, 翟冬雪. (2017b). 道德概念垂直空间隐喻理解中的映射:双向性及不平衡性.心理学报, 49(2), 186-196.
[11] 吕军梅, 鲁忠义. (2013). 为什么快乐在“上”,悲伤在“下”:语篇阅读中情绪的垂直空间隐喻.心理科学, 36(2), 328-334.
[12] 吕勇, 韩宗义, 杜英春. (2003). 启动效应的ERP研究综述.心理与行为研究, (2), 151-155.
[13] 束定芳. (1998). 论隐喻的本质及语义特征.外国语(上海外国语大学学报), (6), 11-20.
[14] 王敏. (2019). 《博雅汉语》中隐喻类词语考察及教学策略研究. 鲁东大学硕士学位论文.
[15] 王小潞. (2008). 汉语隐喻认知的神经机制研究. 浙江大学博士学位论文.
[16] 王锃, 鲁忠义. (2013). 道德概念的垂直空间隐喻及其对认知的影响.心理学报, 45(5), 538-545.
[17] 吴念阳, 陈俊卿, 居银, 白洁, 马子凤. (2012). 汉语隐喻理解时程的ERPs研究.心理科学, 35(4), 811-816.
[18] 杨继平, 郭秀梅, 王兴超. (2017). 道德概念的隐喻表征:从红白颜色、左右位置和正斜字体的维度.心理学报, 49(7), 875-885.
[19] 于明阳, 姜英杰. (2021). FN400和LPC对熟悉性和回想的特异性指向分析.心理科学, 44(2), 302-308.
[20] 张静宇, 黄琳, 马利军. (2023). 粤语喻意型歇后语前、后语节相互作用的关系研究.心理研究, 16(5), 439-448.
[21] Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor.Metaphor and Thought, 2, 19-41.
[22] Bonnaud V., Gil R., & Ingrand P. (2002). Metaphorical and non-metaphorical links: A behavioral and ERP study in young and elderly adults.Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 32(4), 258-268.
[23] Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time.Cognition, 106(2), 579-593.
[24] Casasanto D., Fotakopoulou O., & Boroditsky L. (2010). Space and time in the child’s mind: Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry.Cognitive Science, 34(3), 387-405.
[25] Cleary, A. M. (2004). Orthography, phonology, and meaning: Word features that give rise to feelings of familiarity in recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(3), 446-451.
[26] Cleary A. M., McNeely-White K. L., Huebert A. M., & Claxton A. B. (2021). Déjà vu and the feeling of prediction: An association with familiarity strength.Memory, 29(7), 904-920.
[27] Gibbs Jr, R. W. (1992). Categorization and metaphor understanding.Psychological Review, 99(3), 572-581.
[28] Gil R., Lefevre J. P., Pluchon C., Toullat G., & de Vendeuil A. (1980). A propos de certains aspects des perturbations sémantiques dans l’aphasie: Importance des transferts de sens et des structures phonologiques dans l'appréhension des champs sémantique-s.Neuropsychologia, 18(6), 721-725.
[29] Glucksberg S., Brown M., & McGlone M. S. (1993). Conceptual metaphors are not automatically accessed during idiom comprehension.Memory & Cognition, 21, 711-719.
[30] He X., Chen J., Zhang E., & Li J. (2015). Bidirectional associations of power and size in a priming task.Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 290-300.
[31] Hubbell, J. A., & O’Boyle, M. W. (1995). The effects of metaphorical and literal comprehension processes on lexical decision latency of sentence components.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(4), 269-287.
[32] Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 513-541.
[33] Jia Y., Liu H., Li B., Zhou C., Li L., Zheng L., & Guo X. (2020). Recognition without cued recall across Chinese and English: Exploring the role of phonological, orthographic, and semantic features.The Journal of General Psychology, 147(1), 62-89.
[34] Jostmann N. B., Lakens D., & Schubert T. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance.Psychological Science, 20(9), 1169-1174.
[35] Lakoff G.,& Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[36] Lakoff G., Johnson M., & Sowa J. F. (1999). Review of philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought.Computational Linguistics, 25(4), 631-634.
[37] Lee C.-Y., Tsai J.-L., Huang H.-W., Hung D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2006). The temporal signatures of semantic and phonological activations for Chinese sublexical processing: An event-related potential study.Brain Research, 1121(1), 150-159.
[38] Liu G., Wang Y., Jia Y., & Guo C. (2021). Unitization facilitates familiarity-based cross-language associative recognition.Neuroscience Letters, 744, 135501.
[39] McNeely-White K. L., McNeely-White D. G., Huebert A. M., Carlaw B. N., & Cleary A. M. (2022). Specifying a relationship between semantic and episodic memory in the computation of a feature-based familiarity signal using MINERVA 2.Memory & Cognition, 50(3), 527-545.
[40] Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position.Psychological Science, 15(4), 243-247.
[41] Qiu H., Watson B., & Tay D. (2022). Metaphors and trauma: An image schematic analysis of symptom-specific metaphors.Lingua, 271, 103244.
[42] Reid, J. N., & Katz, A. (2022). Conceptual metaphors influence memory automatically: Evidence from a divided attention false memory task.Memory & Cognition, 50(6), 1336-1349.
[43] Valenzuela, J. (2009). What empirical work can tell us about primary metaphors. Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Lingüístics, 14, 235-249.
[44] Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation.Psychological Science, 19(3), 302-308.
[45] Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research.Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 441-517.
[46] Zhao X., Zheng Y., & Zhao X. (2023). Global bibliometric analysis of conceptual metaphor research over the recent two decades. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1042121.
[47] Zhong, C.-B., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold?Psychological Science, 19(9), 838-842. |
|
|
|
