津巴多时间洞察力量表在中国老年人群体中的适用研究

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.04.004

心理研究

2023, Vol. 16

Issue (4): 317-323 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.04.004

基础研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

津巴多时间洞察力量表在中国老年人群体中的适用研究

李兆愉, 陈有国

西南大学心理学部,西南大学时间心理学研究中心,重庆 400715

The application of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory in the Chinese elderly people

LI Zhaoyu, CHEN Youguo

Time Psychology Research Center, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (5)

全文: PDF (1015 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要采用津巴多时间洞察力量表（ZTPI）对450名老年人进行调查,考察完整版量表（ZTPI-56）以及10个缩短版量表的心理测量特性。结果发现,15个题项的缩短版量表（ZTPI-15）的结构效度最好;ZTPI-56的内部一致性信度高于ZTPI-15量表;相对于ZTPI-56量表,ZTPI-15与抑郁、孤独的相关性更高。结果提示,ZTPI-15可以用于考察中国老年人的时间洞察力与其他心理量（如抑郁、焦虑）的相关关系,未来尚需对ZTPI-15的部分维度进行一步修订以增加其内部一致性信度。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李兆愉
	陈有国

关键词 ：时间洞察力, 津巴多时间洞察力量表, 老年人, 信效度

基金资助:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（19YJC190002）、西南大学2019年度中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（SWU1909444）

通讯作者: 陈有国,男,副教授,博士。Email：cyg1001@swu.edu.cn

引用本文:

李兆愉, 陈有国. 津巴多时间洞察力量表在中国老年人群体中的适用研究[J]. 心理研究, 2023, 16(4): 317-323.
LI Zhaoyu, CHEN Youguo. The application of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory in the Chinese elderly people. Psychological Research, 2023, 16(4): 317-323.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.04.004 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2023/V16/I4/317

[1] 陈永进. (1998). 未来时间透视及其与控制观关系的研究.心理发展与教育, (04),22-26.
[2] 侯杰泰. (2004). 结构方程模型及其应用. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
[3] 吕厚超,黄希庭. (2004). 时间洞察力的心理结构、特征及研究焦点.心理科学, 27(05), 1037-1040.
[4] 吕厚超,黄希庭. (2005). 时间洞察力的理论研究.心理科学进展, (01),27-32.
[5] 申继亮,陈勃,王大华. (2000). 成人期基本认知能力的发展状况研究.心理学报, (1), 54-58.
[6] 陶安琪,刘金平,冯廷勇. (2015). 时间洞察力对跨期选择偏好的预测.心理科学, 38(02), 279-283.
[7] Anagnostopoulos, F., & Griva, F. (2012). Exploring time perspective in Greek young adults: Validation of the zimbardo time perspective inventory and relationships with mental health indicators.Social Indicators Research, 106(1), 41-59.
[8] Bernstein, M. J., & Benfield, J. A. (2013). Past perspective is related to present relationships: Past-positive and negative time perspectives differentially predict rejection sensitivity.Psychological Record, 63(3), 615-627.
[9] Boróka Gács, Béla Birkás, & árpád Csathó. (2019). Time perspectives and pain: Negative time perspective profile predicts elevated vulnerability to pain.Personality and Individual Differences, 153.
[10] Brink T. L., Yesavage J. A., Lum O., Heersema P. H., Adey M., & Rose T. L. (1982). Screening tests for geriatric depression.Clinical Gerontologist: The Journal of Aging and Mental Health, 1(1), 37-43.
[11] Carelli M. G., Wiberg B., & Wiberg M. (2011). Development and construct validation of the Swedish zimbardo time perspective inventory.European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 220-227.
[12] Chen T., Liu L. L., Cui J. F., Chen X. J., & Wang Y. (2016). Developmental trajectory of time perspective: From children to older adults.PsyCh Journal, 5 (4), 245-255.
[13] Cortina, & Jose, M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104.
[14] Cretu, R. Z., & Negovan-Zbǎganu, V. (2013). An exploratory approach of the structure of zimbardo’s time perspective concept.Procedia Social & Behavioral Sciences, 78, 753-757.
[15] Desmyter, F., & Raedt, R. D. (2012). The relationship between time perspective and subjective well-being of older adults.Psychologica Belgica, 52(1), 19-38.
[16] Fieulaine, N., & Martinez, F. (2010). Time under control: Time perspective and desire for control in substance use.Addictive Behaviors, 35(8), 799-802.
[17] Hays, R. D., & Dimatteo, M. R. (1987). A short-form measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51(1), 69-81.
[18] Hu, Li-tze, & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
[19] Jaroslav, Košt'ál, Martina, Klicperová-Baker, Kateřina, & Lukavská, et al. (2016). Short version of the zimbardo time perspective inventory (ZTPI-short) with and without the future-negative scale, verified on nationally representative samples.Time & Society, 25(2), 169-192.
[20] Ji L. J., Guo T., Zhang Z., & Messervey D. (2009). Looking into the past: Cultural differences in perception and representation of past information.Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(4), 761-769.
[21] Laureiro-Martinez D., Trujillo C. A., & Unda J. (2017). Time perspective and age: A review of age associated differences.Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1664-1078.
[22] Liniauskaite, A., & Kairys, A. (2009). The Lithuanian version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI).Psichologija, 40, 66-87.
[23] Marisa, D’Alessio, Angela, Guarino, Vilfredo, & De, et al. (2016). Testing zimbardo’s stanford time perspective inventory (stpi)-short form.Time & Society, 12(2-3), 334-347.
[24] Mckay M. T., Worrell F. C., Temple E. C., Perry J. L., Cole J. C., & Mello Z. R. (2015). Less is not always more: The case of the 36-item short form of the zimbardo time perspective inventory.Personality & Individual Differences, 72, 68-71.
[25] Milfont Taciano L., Andrade Palloma R., Belo Raquel P., & Pessoa Viviany S. (2008). Testing zimbardo time perspective inventory in a brazilian sample.Revista Interamericana De Psicología, 42(1), 49-58.
[26] Orkibi, H. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Hebrew short version of the zimbardo time perspective inventory.Evaluation & the Health Professions, 38(2), 219-245.
[27] Przepiorka A., Sobol-Kwapinska M., Jankowski T. (2016). A Polish short version of the zimbardo time perspective inventory.Personality & Individual Differences, 101, 78-89.
[28] Reuschenbach B., Funke J., Drevensek A., & Ziegler N. (2013). Testing a German version of the zimbardo time perspective inventory (ztpi).Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Psychologica, 6, 16-28.
[29] Sircova A., Van De Vijver, F. J. R., Osin E., Milfont T. L., Fieulaine N., Kislali-Erginbilgic A., et al. (2014). A global look at time: A 24-country study of the equivalence of the zimbardo time perspective inventory.SAGE Open, 4(1), 2158-2440.
[30] Steinberg L., Graham S., O'Brien L., Woolard J., Cauffman E., & Banich M. (2010). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting.Child Development, 80(1), 28-44.
[31] Wakefield C. E., Homewood J., Taylor A., Mahmut M., & Meiser B. (2010). Time perspective in hereditary cancer: Psychometric properties of a short form of the zimbardo time perspective inventory in a community and clinical sample.Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 14(5), 617-627.
[32] Wang Y., Chen X. J., Cui J. F., & Liu L. L. (2015). Testing the zimbardo time perspective inventory in the Chinese context.Psych Journal, 4(3), 166-175.
[33] Wilmeth, J. R., & Cottle, T. J. (1976). Perceiving time: A psychological investigation with men and women.Contemporary Sociology, 7(5), 664.
[34] Worrell, F. C., & Mello, Z. R. (2007). The reliability and validity of zimbardo time perspective inventory scores in academically talented adolescents.Educational & Psychological Measurement, 67(3), 487-504.
[35] Worrell F. C., Temple E. C., McKay M. T., ?ivkovi? U., Perry J. L., Mello Z. R., et al. (2018). A theoretical approach to resolving the psychometric problems associated with the zimbardo time perspective inventory: Results from the USA, Australia, Slovenia, and the United Kingdom.European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34(1), 41-51.
[36] Víctor Corral Verdugo, Sing, B. F., & José Q. Pinheiro. (2006). Sustainable behavior and time perspective: Present, past, and future orientations and their relationship with water conservation behavior.Revista Interamericana De Psicologia, 40(2), 139-147.
[37] Zhang, J. W., & Howell, R. T.(2011). Do time perspectives predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond personality traits?Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1261-1266.
[38] Zhang J. W., Howell R. T., & Bowerman T.(2013). Validating a brief measure of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory.Time & Society, 22(3), 391-409.
[39] Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288.