摘要在等同时间内对信息进行提取比重复阅读产生更持久的记忆保持,即提取练习效应（retrieval practice effect, RPE）。精细提取假说认为RPE是由于提取过程中精加工导致的语义激活增强了记忆保持;情景背景假说认为对事件背景进行的重构和更新促进了记忆保持。论文梳理和比较了两个理论的行为和神经机制证据,分析了二者在提取线索和提取激活脑区上的差异,指出编码与提取在RPE中并非完全对立而是相互融合。未来研究可进一步验证情景背景假说,结合认知神经科学检验提取过程中背景回忆和语义精加工的交互作用,并拓展神经机制研究中使用的学习材料和记录方法。
廖陈陈, 张锦坤. 提取练习效应中的编码与提取：对立还是融合?[J]. 心理研究, 2024, 17(4): 308-314.
LIAO Chenchen, ZHANG Jinkun. Encoding and retrieval in the retrieval practice effect： Opposition or integration?. Psychological Research, 2024, 17(4): 308-314.
[1] 郭娜娜, 吴国榕, 毕明华, 邱江. (2018). 努力控制及其神经基础.心理科学, 41(3), 546-552. [2] 梁秀玲, 李鹏, 陈庆飞, 雷怡, 李红. (2015). 提取学习有利于学习与记忆的认知神经基础.心理科学进展, 23(7), 1151-1159. [3] 马小凤, 周爱保, 崔丹, 张荣华. (2014). “提取练习” 促进意义学习: 实验凭证与教学应用.心理科学进展, 22(2), 279-287. [4] 马小凤, 周爱保, 杨小娥. (2017). 线索强度:检验提取练习效应内部机制的重要变量.心理发展与教育, 33(3), 313-320. [5] 王植洵, 张锦坤. (2017). 提取练习效应的产生机制:编码、提取的整合演变.心理科学进展, 25(9),1512-1520. [6] 周爱保, 杨小娥, 马小凤, 王科, 夏瑞雪. (2017). 学习方式的变革:提取促进学习.心理科学, 40(4), 913-919. [7] Adesope O. O., Trevisan D. A., & Sundararajan N. (2017). Rethinking the use of tests: A meta-analysis of practice testing.Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 659-701. [8] Akan M., Stanley S. E., & Benjamin A. S. (2018). Testing enhances memory for context.Journal of Memory and Language, 103, 19-27. [9] Bai C.-H., Bridger E. K., Zimmer H. D., & Mecklinger A. (2015). The beneficial effect of testing: An event-related potential study.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 248. [10] Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1563-1569. [11] Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to latermretention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of themtesting effect.Joumal of Experimenlal Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1547-1552. [12] Carpenter, S. K., & Yeung, K. L. (2017). The role of mediator strength in learning from retrieval.Lournal of Memory and Language, 92, 128-141. [13] Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 416-423. [14] Hong M. K., Polyn S. M., & Fazio L. K. (2019). Examining the episodic context account: Does retrieval practice enhance memory for context?Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4(1), 1-9. [15] Jonker T. R., Dimsdale-Zucker H., Ritchey M., Clarke A., & Ranganath C. (2018). Neural reactivation in parietal cortex enhances memory for episodically linked information.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(43), 11084-11089. [16] Karpicke J. D.(2017). Retrieval-based learning: A decade of progress. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory, Vol. 2 of Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (J. H. Byrne, Series Ed.) (pp. 487-514). Oxford: Academic Press. [17] Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping.Science, 331(6018), 772-775. [18] Karpicke J. D., Lehman M., & Aue, W. R. (2014). Retrieval-based learning: An episodic context account. In Psychology of learning and motivation(Vol. 61, pp. 237-284). Academic Press. [19] Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning.Science, 319(5865), 966-968. [20] Karpicke, J. D., & Smith, M. A. (2012). Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding.Journal of Memory and Language, 67(1), 17-29. [21] Karpicke, J. D., & Zaromb, F. M. (2010). Retrieval mode distinguishes the testing effect from the generation effect.Journal of Memory and Language, 62(3), 227-239. [22] Knight J. B., Hunter Ball B., Brewer G. A., DeWitt M. R., & Marsh R. L. (2012). Testing unsuccessfully: A specification of the underlying mechanisms supporting its influence on retention.Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 731-746. [23] Lehman M., Smith M. A., & Karpicke J. D. (2014). Toward an episodic context account of retrieval-based learning: Dissociating retrieval practice and elaboration.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory Cognition, 40(6), 1787-1794. [24] Liu Y., Rosburg T., Gao C., Weber C., & Guo C. (2017). Differentiation of subsequent memory effects between retrieval practice and elaborative study.Biological Psychology, 127, 134-147. [25] McDermott, K. B. (2021). Practicing retrieval facilitates learning.Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 609-633. [26] Mecklinger A., Rosburg T., & Johansson M. (2016). Reconstructing the past: The late posterior negativity (LPN) in episodic memory studies.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 621-638. [27] Nelson S. M., Arnold K. M., Gilmore A. W., & McDermott K. B. (2013). The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 33(29), 11754-11762. [28] Peng Y., Liu Y., & Guo C. (2019). Examining the neural mechanism behind testing effect with concrete and abstract words.NeuroReport, 30(2), 113-119. [29] Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2010). Why testing improves memory: Mediator effectiveness hypothesis.Science, 330(6002), 335-335. [30] Rawson K. A., Vaughn K. E., & Carpenter S. K. (2015). Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis.Memory Cognition, 43(4), 619-633. [31] Rawson, K. A., & Zamary, A. (2019). Why is free recall practice more effective than recognition practice for enhancing memory? Evaluating the relational processing hypothesis.Journal of Memory and Language, 105, 141-152. [32] Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20-27. [33] Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention.Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255. [34] Rosburg T., Johansson M., Weigl M., & Mecklinger A. (2014). How does testing affect retrieval-related processes? An event-related potential (ERP) study on the short-term effects of repeated retrieval.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(1), 195-210. [35] van den Broek G., Takashima A., Wiklund-H?rnqvist C., Karlsson Wirebring L., Segers E., Verhoeven L., & Nyberg L. (2016). Neurocognitive mechanisms of the “testing effect”: A review.Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 5(2), 52-66. [36] van den Broek, G. S., Takashima A., Segers E., Fernandez G., & Verhoeven L. (2013). Neural correlates of testing effects in vocabulary learning.Neuroimage, 78, 94-102. [37] Whiffen, J. W., & Karpicke, J. D. (2017). The role of episodic context in retrieval practice effects.Joumal of Experimenlal Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1036-1046. [38] Wiklund-Hörnqvist C., Stillesjö S., Andersson M., Jonsson B., & Nyberg L. (2021). Retrieval practice facilitates learning by strengthening processing in both the anterior and posterior hippocampus.Brain and Behavior, 11(1), e01909. [39] Wirebring L. K., Wiklund-H?rnqvist C., Eriksson J., Andersson M., Jonsson B., & Nyberg L. (2015). Lesser neural pattern similarity across repeated tests is associated with better long-term memory retention.Journal of Neuroscience, 35(26), 9595-9602. [40] Ye Z., Shi L., Li A., Chen C., & Xue G. (2020). Retrieval practice facilitates memory updating by enhancing and differentiating medial prefrontal cortex representations.Elife, 9, e57023.
