数字线估计的模型与策略：有界和无界的相似与分离

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2024.04.002

心理研究

2024, Vol. 17

Issue (4): 301-307 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2024.04.002

基础研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

数字线估计的模型与策略：有界和无界的相似与分离

李敏^1,2, 孙晓辉¹, 李文杰¹, 李梦霞¹

1 湖州师范学院教师教育学院,湖州 313000;
2 湖州市爱山小学,湖州 313000

Models and strategies for numerical line estimation：Similarity and separation of bounded and unbounded

LI Min^1,2, SUN Xiaohui¹, LI Wenjie¹, LI Mengxia¹

1 School of Teacher Education, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000;
2 Huzhou Aishan Primany School, Huzhou 313000

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (941 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 Cohen于2011年提出了无界数字线估计任务,诸多研究表明该任务克服了传统有界数字线估计任务的局限,能够反映更加纯粹的数字表征本质。然而,无界数字线估计的模型与策略与有界数字线估计的异同,还有待检验。文章分别对有界和无界数字线估计任务中的数字表征模型和估计策略进行梳理,分析两种任务中数字线表征模型以及估计策略发展与转变的相似与分离,并进一步推测估计策略与表征模型之间的关系,以期为数字认知的相关研究提供参考。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李敏
	孙晓辉
	李文杰
	李梦霞

关键词 ：有界数字线估计, 无界数字线估计, 数字表征模型, 估计策略

基金资助:全国教育科学规划课题（BBA190026）

通讯作者: 李梦霞,女,教授,博士。Email：limx@zjhu.edu.cn

引用本文:

李敏, 孙晓辉, 李文杰, 李梦霞. 数字线估计的模型与策略：有界和无界的相似与分离[J]. 心理研究, 2024, 17(4): 301-307.
LI Min, SUN Xiaohui, LI Wenjie, LI Mengxia. Models and strategies for numerical line estimation：Similarity and separation of bounded and unbounded. Psychological Research, 2024, 17(4): 301-307.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2024.04.002 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2024/V17/I4/301

[1] 李梦霞. (2017). SNARC效应的视觉—空间与言语—空间双编码机制研究. 华东师范大学博士学位论文.
[2] 刘国芳, 辛自强. (2012). 数字线估计研究:“模型”背后的策略.心理研究, 5(02), 27-33.
[3] 莫雷, 周广东, 温红博. (2010). 儿童数字估计中的心理长度.心理学报, 42(05), 569-580.
[4] 邢强, 徐争鸣, 蔡新华. (2015). 小学生数字线估计中的分段策略. 数学教育学报, 24(04), 82-87.
[5] 徐华, 陈英和. (2012). 儿童数字线估计研究的述评与前瞻.心理研究, 5(05), 46-50.
[6] 许晓晖. (2015). 儿童数字估计能力的研究进展及其启示. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), (03), 148-155.
[7] 臧蓓蕾, 张俊, 顾荣芳. (2019). 幼儿心理数线的发展:估计准确率与模型背后的策略.心理与行为研究, 17(06), 795-802.
[8] Barth H., Slusser E., Kanjlia S., Garcia J., Taggart J., & Chase E. (2016). How feedback improves children’s numerical estimation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1198-1205.
[9] Barth, H. C., & Paladino, A. M. (2011). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence against a representational shift.Developmental Science, 14(1), 125-135.
[10] Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation.Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 189-201.
[11] Brannon, E. M., & Van de Walle, G. A.(2001) The development of ordinal numerical competence in young children. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 53-81.
[12] Brannon E. M., Wusthoff C. J., Gallistel C. R., & Gibbon J. (2001). Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: Evidence for a linear subjective number scale.Psychological Science, 12(3), 238-243.
[13] Cohen D. J., Blanc‐Goldhammer D., & Quinlan P. T. (2018). A mathematical model of how people solve most variants of the number‐line task.Cognitive Science, 42(8), 2621-2647.
[14] Cohen, D. J., & Blanc-Goldhammer, D. (2011). Numerical bias in bounded and unbounded number line tasks.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 331-338.
[15] Cohen, D. J., & Ray, A. (2020). Experimental bias in number-line tasks and how to avoid them: Comment on Kim and Opfer (2017) and the introduction of the Cohen Ray number-line task.Developmental Psychology, 56(4), 846-852.
[16] Cohen, D. J., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2014). Children's number-line estimation shows development of measurement skills (not number representations).Developmental Psychology, 50(6), 1640-1652.
[17] Gentner, D., & Colhoun, J. (2010). Analogical processes in human thinking and learning.Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 8(3), 35-48.
[18] Georges, C., & Schiltz, C. (2021). Number line tasks and their relation to arithmetics in second to fourth graders.Journal of Numerical Cognition, 7(1), 20-41.
[19] Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer.Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 1-38.
[20] Honour, L. A. (2020). Children’s mental representation of number, their number line estimations and maths achievement: Exploring the role of 3D mental rotation skills. University of Southampton.
[21] Kim, D., & Opfer, J. E. (2020). Compression is evident in children’s unbounded and bounded numerical estimation: Reply to Cohen and Ray (2020).Developmental Psychology, 56(4), 853-860.
[22] Kim, D., & Opfer, J. E. (2017). A unified framework for bounded and unbounded numerical estimation.Developmental Psychology, 53(6), 1088-1097.
[23] Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles.Cognition, 105(2), 395-438.
[24] Link T., Huber S., Nuerk H. C., & Moeller K. (2014). Unbounding the mental number line—New evidence on children’s spatial representation of numbers.Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1021.
[25] Link T., Huber S., Nuerk H. C., & Moeller K. (2014). Unbounding the mental number line—New evidence on children’s spatial representation of numbers.Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1021.
[26] Luwel K., Peeters D., & Verschaffel L. (2019). Developmental change in number line estimation: A strategy-based perspective.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(3), 144-156.
[27] Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position.Psychological Science, 15(4), 243-247.
[28] Moeller K., Pixner S., Kaufmann L., & Nuerk H. C. (2009). Children’s early mental number line: Logarithmic or decomposed linear?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(4), 503-515.
[29] Newman, R. S., & Berger, C. F. (1984). Children’s numerical estimation: Flexibility in the use of counting.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 55-64.
[30] Peeters D., Degrande T., Ebersbach M., Verschaffel L., & Luwel K. (2016). Children’s use of number line estimation strategies.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(2), 117-134.
[31] Peeters D., Verschaffel L., & Luwel K. (2017). Benchmark-based strategies in whole number line estimation.British Journal of Psychology, 108(4), 668-686.
[32] Reinert R. M., Hartmann M., Huber S., & Moeller K. (2019). Unbounded number line estimation as a measure of numerical estimation.PLoS One, 14(3), e0213102.
[33] Reinert R. M., Huber S., Nuerk H. C., & Moeller K. (2015). Strategies in unbounded number line estimation? Evidence from eye-tracking.Cognitive Processing, 16(1), 359-363.
[34] Reinert R. M., Huber S., Nuerk H. C., & Moeller K. (2017). Sex differences in number line estimation: The role of numerical estimation.British Journal of Psychology, 108(2), 334-350.
[35] Reinert R. M., Huber S., Nuerk H. C., & Moeller K. (2015). Multiplication facts and the mental number line: Evidence from unbounded number line estimation.Psychological Research, 79(1), 95-103.
[36] Reinert, R. M., & Moeller, K. (2021). The new unbounded number line estimation task: A systematic literature review.Acta Psychologica, 219, 103366.
[37] Rouder, J. N., & Geary, D. C. (2014). Children’s cognitive representation of the mathematical number line.Developmental Science, 17(4), 525-536.
[38] Schneider M., Merz S., Stricker J., De Smedt B., Torbeyns J., Verschaffel L., & Luwel K. (2018). Associations of number line estimation with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis.Child Development, 89(5), 1467-1484.
[39] Siegler, R. S., & Lortie‐Forgues, H. (2014). An integrative theory of numerical development.Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 144-150.
[40] Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity.Psychological Science, 14(3), 237-250
[41] Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity.Psychological Science, 14(3), 237-250.
[42] Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children.Child Development, 75(2), 428-444.
[43] Siegler, R. S., & Lortie‐Forgues, H. (2014). An integrative theory of numerical development.Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 144-150.
[44] Siegler, R. S., & Mu, Y. (2008). Chinese children excel on novel mathematics problems even before elementary school.Psychological Science, 19(8), 759-763.
[45] Slusser E. B., Santiago R. T., & Barth H. C. (2013). Developmental change in numerical estimation.Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 142(1), 193-208.
[46] Sullivan J. L., Juhasz B. J., Slattery T. J., & Barth H. C. (2011). Adults’ number-line estimation strategies: Evidence from eye movements.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(3), 557-563.
[47] Van der Weijden, F. A., Kamphorst E., Willemsen R. H., Kroesbergen E. H., & Van Hoogmoed, A. H. (2018). Strategy use on bounded and unbounded number lines in typically developing adults and adults with dyscalculia: An eye-tracking study.Journal of Numerical Cognition, 4(2), 337-359.
[48] Yuan L., Prather R., Mix K. S., & Smith L. B. (2020). Number representations drive number-line estimates.Child Development, 91(4), e952-e967.