高校教师的君子人格与创新工作行为的关系：有调节的中介模型

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2025.06.008

Psychological Research

2025, Vol. 18

Issue (6): 546-557 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2025.06.008

School Psychology Research

Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

Research on the relationship between Junzi personality and innovative teaching behaviors of college teachers： A moderated meditation model

XU Yaping^1,2, SHEN Menglu², WU Mingzheng³, YIN Jinrong⁴

1 College of Teacher Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062;
2 Yangming School, Shaoxing Vocational & Technical College, Shaoxing 312000;
3 Department of Psychology and Behavior Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058;
4 Department of Public Physical and Art Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (1064 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on the trait activation theory, this study explored the relationship between Junzi personality and innovative teaching behaviors, as well as the mediating role of career calling and the moderating effect of job autonomy. A total of 523 college teachers were measured by the Junzi Personality Scale, Career Calling Scale, Job Autonomy Scale, and Innovative Teaching Behaviors Scale. The results showed that Junzi personality was positively associated with innovative teaching behaviors, and career calling mediated the effect of junzi personality on innovative teaching behaviors. Moreover, the indirect effect of career calling was positively moderated by job autonomy. As job autonomy increased, the indirect effect of career calling increased. Therefore, Junzi personality can enhance the career calling of college teachers and thus affect innovative work behavior, while job autonomy can strengthen the positive impact of Junzi personality on innovative work behavior of college teachers.

Key words： Junzi personality career calling job autonomy innovative teaching behaviors

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	XU Yaping
	SHEN Menglu
	WU Mingzheng
	YIN Jinrong

Cite this article:

XU Yaping,SHEN Menglu,WU Mingzheng, et al. Research on the relationship between Junzi personality and innovative teaching behaviors of college teachers： A moderated meditation model[J]. Psychological Research, 2025, 18(6): 546-557.

URL:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/EN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2025.06.008 OR http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/EN/Y2025/V18/I6/546

[1] 蔡杨, 石文典, 陈晓惠. (2019). 员工内外部动机对隐性知识共享意愿和创新行为的影响. 心理研究, 12(1), 56-66.
[2] 陈来. (2015). 中华文明的核心价值. 北京: 三联书店.
[3] 陈奕然. (2023). 越乐观越创新?乐观特质对企业创新行为的影响研究.广西经济, (3), 24-28.
[4] 程婧楠, 刘毅, 梁三才. (2017). 大学生生涯适应力与职业探索:职业使命感和职业决策自我效能感的中介作用.中国健康心理学杂志, 25(2), 237-240.
[5] 崔小雨, 苏涛. (2023). 使命感召,其效何如:一项职业使命感效能的元分析检验.中国人力资源开发, 40(10), 33-47.
[6] 崔英锦, 樊香麟. (2022). 共情与特殊教育教师工作投入的关系:职业使命感的中介作用.中国特殊教育, 268(10), 73-88.
[7] 戴勇, 刘颖洁. (2021). 包容型领导能增强员工工作重塑行为吗: 职业承诺和使命感视角.湖北工业大学学报, 36(6), 31-35.
[8] 邓玉林, 王家爱, 刘航. (2023). 组织自尊对知识型员工创新行为的影响机制: 传统上下级关系与工作投入视角.科技管理研究, (18), 169-176.
[9] 葛枭语, 侯玉波. (2021). 君子不忧不惧:君子型人格与心理健康: 自我控制与真实性的链式中介.心理学报, 53(4), 374-386.
[10] 葛枭语, 李小明, 侯玉波. (2021). 孔子思想中的君子人格: 心理学测量的探索.心理学报, 53(12), 1321-1334.
[11] 郭晟豪, 胡倩倩. (2023). 力学不倦: 组织认同、工作繁荣下的创新绩效.管理评论, 34(1), 205-217.
[12] 侯小兵, 胡进耀, 邵镪钎, 杨慧. (2019). 高校教师创新支持行为与教学满意度关系的实证研究: 以X高校“创造学”课程为例.创新与创业教育, 10(4), 130-134.
[13] 胡莹莹, 刘一璇, 李娜, 杨一鸣, 王文静. (2021). 中小学教师品格优势对工作投入的影响: 职业使命感的中介作用.当代教育科学, (9), 80-87.
[14] 李明军, 高洁, 王振宏, 游旭群. (2016). 调节聚焦倾向与教师创新工作行为:自主性与控制性动机的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 14(1), 42-49+56.
[15] 李懿, 李新建, 刘翔宇. (2018). 技能延展力与员工创新行为的关系研究: 工作复杂性与心理安全感的调节作用.研究与发展管理, 30(5),104-114.
[16] 梁宁建, 吴明证, 高旭成. (2003). 基于反应时范式的内隐社会认知研究方法.心理科学, 26(2), 208-211.
[17] 廖传景, 胡瑜, 张进辅. (2014). 中小学教师职业使命感与职业承诺的相关调查研究.教育导刊, (10), 30-33.
[18] 刘丽丹, 王忠军. (2021). 职业使命感如何促进大学教师职业成功: 工作努力与目标承诺的链式中介作用.心理研究, 14(1), 59-68.
[19] 刘玉新, 陈晨, 朱楠, 张建卫, 王帅. (2020). 何以近朱者赤、近墨者黑?特质激活理论的缘起、现状和未来.心理科学进展, 28(1), 161-177.
[20] 马君, 张昊民, 杨涛. (2015). 绩效评价、成就目标导向对团队成员工作创新行为的跨层次影响.管理工程学报, 29(3), 62-71.
[21] 申燕. (2007). 创造型教师心理特征的结构及特点研究. 山东师范大学硕士学位论文.
[22] 师保国. (2018). 教师的创新素养: 意义、内涵及其提升.人民教育, (Z2), 23-27.
[23] 王弘钰, 寇先柳. (2023). 差错管理氛围对员工越轨创新的影响: 一个有调节的中介效应模型.技术经济, 42(1), 53-63.
[24] 王辉, 肖宇婷. (2023). 远程工作对员工创新行为的“双刃剑”效应.软科学, 36(6), 98-105.
[25] 王颜芳, 张武欣, 史淑桃. (2022). 学习型组织文化、工作价值观与高校教师创新行为.管理工程师, 27(2), 32-38.
[26] 卫倩平. (2018). 国外教师创新能力研究热点:基于VOSviewer的知识图谱分析.当代教育与文化, 10(5), 61-68.
[27] 魏钧, 张德. (2006). 中国传统文化影响下的个人与组织契合度研究.管理科学学报, 9(6), 87-96.
[28] 温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷. (2005). 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报, 37(2), 268-274.
[29] 温忠麟, 黄彬彬, 汤丹丹. (2018). 问卷数据建模前传.心理科学, 41(1), 204-210.
[30] 吴敏. (2023). 工作自主性如何影响员工创新行为: 被中介的调节效应模型.经营与管理, (3), 133-140.
[31] 夏海鹰, 刘梦婷, 高朝阳. (2019). 学校创新氛围如何影响教师创新行为: 基于知识管理理论的实证研究.现代教育管理, 398(12), 81-86.
[32] 谢宝国, 王芳, 缪佳玲, 胡浩. (2023). 职业使命感对科研人员职业幸福感的影响.科研管理, 44(5), 184-192.
[33] 谢倩, 陈谢平. (2021). 心理契约对高校教师创新行为的影响: 基于情感承诺和使命感视角的实证分析.乐山师范学院学报, 36(12), 116-123.
[34] 熊会兵, 陶玉静. (2024). 高绩效工作系统如何影响员工创新行为: 组织认同与服务型领导的作用.科技进步与对策, 41(2), 130-140.
[35] 徐娟, 周艳娟, 董鑫, 赵春辉, 付东然, 王爽, 孙健文, 张诗曼, 孙野. (2023). 医学生主动性人格与创新行为的关系: 心理资本的中介作用.黑龙江医学, 47(15), 1851-1853.
[36] 徐艳贞, 黄茂勇. (2023). 园长创造型领导对幼儿园教师创新教学表现的影响:组织创新支持和创新型组织文化的链式中介作用.学前教育研究, (9), 65-78.
[37] 杨洁, 吴茂娟, 黄勇. (2023). 乐趣活动对员工创新行为的倒“U”型影响: 基于工作投入和工作自主性的作用.管理评论,35(8), 255-267.
[38] 姚柱, 张显春, 熊正德. (2020). TMT工作使命感、双元创新与企业创新绩效.科技进步与对策, 37(5), 87-94.
[39] 叶宝娟, 郑清, 董圣鸿, 方小婷, 刘林林. (2017). 职业使命感对大学生可就业能力的影响: 求职清晰度与求职效能感的中介作用.心理发展与教育, 33(1), 37-44.
[40] 张春雨. (2015). 职业使命感:结构、测量及其与幸福的联系. 西南大学博士学位论文.
[41] 张敏, 张凌. (2012). 教师创新工作行为与创新气氛的关系.人类工效学, 18(3), 1-6.
[42] 赵小云, 王静. (2016). 幼儿教师的职业使命感与工作绩效的关系: 组织承诺的中介作用.教师教育研究, 28(6), 59-64.
[43] 郑楠, 周恩毅. (2017). 高校青年教师的工作幸福感对其创新行为的影响研究.国家教育行政学院学报, 303(10), 58-64.
[44] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法.心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[45] 朱永跃, 宋锐. (2023). 职场精神力对员工越轨创新行为的影响机制研究.科技进步与对策, 40(21), 140-150.
[46] Brambilla M., Carraro L., Castelli L., & Sacchi S. (2019). Changing impressions: Moral character dominates impression updating.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82(3), 64-73.
[47] Cayirdag, N. (2017). Creativity fostering teaching: Impact of creative self-efficacy and teacher efficacy.Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(6), 1959-1975.
[48] Cordery J. L., Morrison D., Wright B. M., & Wall T. D. (2010). The impact of autonomy and task uncertainty on team performance: A longitudinal field study.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3), 240-258.
[49] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review.Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
[50] Demerouti E., Bakker A. B., Nachreiner F., & Schaufeli W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout.Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512.
[51] Dik, B., & Duffy, R. (2009). Calling and vocation at work: Definitions and prospects for research and practice.The Counseling Psychologist, 37(5), 424-450.
[52] Duffy, R. D., & W. E. Sedlacek. (2007). The presence of and search for a calling: Connections to career development.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(3), 590-601.
[53] Elangovan A., Pinder C. C., & Mclean M. (2010). Callings and organizational behavior.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(3), 428-440.
[54] Kirmeyer, S. L., & Shirom, A. (1986). Perceived job autonomy in the manufacturing sector: Effects of unions, gender, and substantive complexity.Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 832-840.
[55] Lee W. R., Choi S. B., & Kang S. W. (2021). How leaders’ positive feedback influences employees' innovative behavior: The mediating role of voice behavior and job autonomy.Sustainability, 13, 1901.
[56] Liang J., Farh C. I., & Farh J. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination.Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.
[57] Lips-Wiersma, M., & Wright, S. (2012). Measuring the meaning of meaningful work: Development and validation of the comprehensive meaningful work scale.Group & Organization Management, 37(5), 655-685.
[58] Morges F. P., Delaney-Kling K. A., & Hemingwa M. A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 399-406.
[59] Sali, G., & Akyol, A. K. (2015). Creativity of preschool and elementary school teachers and their students.Perceptual and Motor Skill, 121(3), 759-765.
[60] Savickas, M. L. & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661-673.
[61] Savickas, M. L. (2020). Career construction theory and counseling model. In: Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W.(Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory to work, pp. 165-199). John Wiley Sons.
[62] Steger M. F., Dik B. J., & Duffy R. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The Work and Meaning Inventory (WAMI).Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322-337.
[63] Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500-517.
[64] Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation.Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 397-423.
[65] Wrzesniewski A., McCauley C., Rozin P., & Schwartz B. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings: People’s relations to their work.Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 21-33.