|
|
|
| The impact of temporal leadership on team innovation from the perspective of social information processing theory |
| SHI Heyuzi1, YU Guangyu2, PENG Shuting3, ZHAO Min3, PENG Jian2 |
1 School of Marxism, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 102400;
2 School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189;
3 School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Temporal leadership is regarded by scholars as an effective way of leadership and is also valued by managers. But what is the key to converting the temporal leadership behavior exhibited by leaders into effective output? To explore this issue, this study was based on social information processing theory and collected leader member matching data from 216 employees in 55 teams for regression analysis. The results indicated that temporal leadership positively affected team innovation through leadership effectiveness consensus, while leader’s boundary spanning behavior moderated this indirect relationship. That is, when the level of leader’s boundary spanning behavior was low, time leadership had a stronger positive impact on team innovation through leadership effectiveness consensus; On the contrary, when the level of leader’s boundary spanning behavior was high, the positive impact of temporal leadership on team innovation through leadership effectiveness consensued weakened. This study compensates for the shortcomings of existing theories and provides theoretical guidance for leveraging the effectiveness of temporal leadership to promote team innovation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 蔡杨, 石文典, 陈晓惠. (2019). 员工内外部动机对隐性知识共享意愿和创新行为的影响.心理研究, 12(1), 56-66.
[2] 陈晨, 秦昕, 谭玲, 卢海陵, 周汉森, 宋博迪. (2020). 授权型领导:下属自我领导匹配对下属情绪衰竭和工作绩效的影响.管理世界, 36(12), 145-162.
[3] 李树祥, 梁巧转, 杨柳青. (2012). 团队认知多样性和团队沟通对团队创造力的影响研究.科学学与科学技术管理, 33(12), 153-159.
[4] 刘冰, 徐璐, 齐蕾. (2017). 时间领导与团队学习行为:基于建筑业项目团队的调查研究.中国软科学, 313(1), 115-126.
[5] 刘新梅, 张新星, 崔天恒. (2017). 时间压力与创造力的关系研究:时间领导的跨层调节作用.研究与发展管理, 29(5), 13-21.
[6] 马君, 闫嘉妮. (2019). 创新团队的领导时间统筹与员工同步配合的协同机理研究.外国经济与管理, 41(10), 141-152.
[7] 马璐, 陈婷婷, 谢鹏, 赵宣. (2021). 不合规任务对员工创新行为的影响:心理脱离与时间领导的作用.科技进步与对策, 38(13), 135-142.
[8] 宋萌, 胡鹤颜, 王震, 董玉杰. (2020). 领导跨界行为对下属绩效的积极与消极效应研究.管理学报, 17(5), 671-679.
[9] 宋萌, 胡鹤颜, 王震. (2021). 收益还是代价?领导跨界行为对领导绩效的积极与消极影响.管理评论, 33(4), 236-247.
[10] 汤丹丹, 温忠麟. (2020). 共同方法偏差检验:问题与建议.心理科学, 43(1), 215-223.
[11] 王沛, 胡林成. (2002). 社会信息加工领域中的情境模型理论.心理科学进展, (3), 285-289.
[12] 王艳子, 白丽莎, 李倩. (2017). 团队领导跨界行为对团队创造力的影响机理: 知识管理视角.科技进步与对策, 34(3), 140-146.
[13] 卫武, 王怡宇, 赵鹤, 张琴. (2021). 多元时间观情境下团队时间领导对团队创造力的影响.管理评论, 33(4), 92-101.
[14] 卫武, 赵鹤. (2018). 团队时间领导与团队创新行为: 基于团队从工作中的心理解脱视角.南开管理评论, 21(4), 39-49.
[15] 魏雨宸, 金国华, 李铭泽. (2018). 团队跨边界行为:前因、后果及作用机制. 中国人力资源开发, 35(9), 73-84+138.
[16] 徐磊. (2019). 跨界行为、团队信任与创新绩效:资源损耗的调节作用.科技进步与对策, 36(6), 11-18.
[17] 张军成, 凌文辁. (2015). 时间领导研究述评与展望:一个组织行为学观点. 外国经济与管理, 37(1), 3-10+42.
[18] 张军成, 凌文辁. (2016). 时间领导对员工助人行为的影响:工作激情和主动型人格的作用.心理科学, 39(4), 927-933.
[19] 钟博维, 高友明, 钟毅平. (2011). 时间管理的心理学研究.心理研究, 4(6), 72-75.
[20] 朱金强, 徐世勇, 周金毅, 张柏楠, 许昉昉, 宗博强. (2020). 跨界行为对创造力影响的跨层次双刃剑效应.心理学报, 52(11), 1340-1351.
[21] 周建涛, 廖建桥. (2018). 基于社会信息加工理论的谦逊领导对员工工作绩效的作用机制研究.管理学报, 15(12), 1789-1798.
[22] 邹艳春, 彭坚, 印田彬. (2018). 团队学习气氛对团队心理资本的影响:社会信息加工理论的视角.心理与行为研究, 16(3), 402-407.
[23] Acar O. A., Tarakci M., & van Knippenberg D. (2019). Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review.Journal of Management, 45(1), 96-121.
[24] Ahearne M., MacKenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M., Mathieu J. E., & Lam S. K. (2010). The role of consensus in sales team performance.Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 458-469.
[25] Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure.The Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217-230.
[26] Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams.Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634-665.
[27] Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost?Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1078-1095.
[28] Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage.Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229-283.
[29] Choi, J. N. (2022). External activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoretical development.Small Group Research, 33(2), 181-208.
[30] Conger, J., & Kanungo, R. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[31] Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression.Child Development, 67(3), 993-1002.
[32] De Dreu, C. K. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams.Journal of Management, 32(1), 83-107.
[33] De Dreu, C. K., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making.Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191-1201.
[34] De Hoogh A. H., Den Hartog D. N., & Koopman P. L. (2005). Linking the Big Five‐Factors of personality to charismatic and transactional leadership; perceived dynamic work environment as a moderator.Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(7), 839-865.
[35] Fleming, L., & Waguespack, D. M. (2007). Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities.Organization Science, 18(2), 165-180.
[36] Goldman, B. M. (2001). Toward an understanding of employment discrimination claiming: An integration of organizational justice and social information processing theories.Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 361-386.
[37] Harrison, S. H., & Wagner, D. T. (2016). Spilling outside the box: The effects of individuals’ creative behaviors at work on time spent with their spouses at home.Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 841-859.
[38] Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 657-690.
[39] Katz, R., & Tushman, M. L. (1983). A longitudinal study of the effects of boundary spanning supervision on turnover and promotion in research and development.Academy of Management Journal, 26(3), 437-456.
[40] Marrone, J. A. (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future.Journal of Management, 36(4), 911-940.
[41] Marrone J. A., Tesluk P. E., & Carson J. B. (2007). A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior.Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1423-1439.
[42] Mohammed, S., & Nadkarni, S. (2011). Temporal diversity and team performance: The moderating role of team temporal leadership.Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 489-508.
[43] Pan Y., Shang Y.,& Xu, J.(2019). When is chronotype diversity related to team creativity? Team temporal leadership as a moderator. Academy of Management Proceedings, 10.5465/AMBPP.2019.48.
[44] Policastro E.,& Gardner, H. (1998). From case studies to robust generalizations: An approach to the study of creativity In R J Sternberg (Ed), Handbook of Creativity Cambridge Cambridge University Press An approach to the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
[45] Porter C. O. L. H., Webb J. W., & Gogus C. I. (2010). When goal orientations collide: Effects of learning and performance orientation on team adaptability in response to workload imbalance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 935-943.
[46] Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (2022). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins., C. P. Herman., & M. P. Zanna.(Eds). Social cognition (pp. 86-132). Routledge.
[47] Wang G., Liu X., & Liu Y. (2019). Role overload, knowledge acquisition and job satisfaction: An ambidexterity perspective on boundary-spanning activities of IT employees.The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 728-757.
[48] West, M., & Farr, J. L. (1991) Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies.Health Policy, 45(3), 175-186.
[49] Xiao H., Zhang Z., & Zhang L. (2022). Is temporal leadership always beneficial? The role of job passion and synchrony preference.Personnel Review, 51(1), 299-316.
[50] Zhang J., van Eerde W., Gevers J. M. P., & Zhu W. (2021). How temporal leadership boosts employee innovative job performance.European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 23-42. |
|
|
|
