|
|
|
| Ten lines at one glance from the perspectives of reading psychology |
| YAN Guoli1,2, SONG Ziming1,2,3 |
1 Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education,Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
2 Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
3 School of Educational Sciences, Ludong University, Yantai 264025 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract “Ten lines at one glance” is an idiom that often used to describe the reader's very fast reading speed. Can readers really achieve “ten lines at one glance” while reading? Scientific understanding of the issue has important guiding significance for reading instruction. From the perspective of reading psychology, “ten lines at one glance” can describe the reader's reading speed is fast, but it is unscientific to describe that the reader can get ten lines of text at a glance. Combining the latest research findings in reading psychology, the present report summarized the inherent reasons why “ten lines at one glance” is unscientific from two aspects： the characteristics of eye movement during reading and the range of effective information obtained from one fixation. On this basis, this report analyzed the “ten lines at one glance” phenomenon in reading from three aspects： image, skimming, and fast reading. Finally, we proposed future research directions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 白柳, 程晓云, 李韵静, 王梦轩, 黄有玉, 闫国利. (2014). 小学三年级学生语文快速阅读训练的实验研究:来自眼动的证据.天津师范大学学报(基础教育版), 15(3), 47-52.
[2] 白学军, 闫国利. (2017). 阅读心理学. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
[3] Coon D.(2004). 心理学导论:思想与行为的认识之路(第9版)(郑钢等译). 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 362.
[4] 汉语大词典. (2001). 上海: 汉语大词典出版社.
[5] 高敏, 徐迩嘉, 任桂琴, 隋雪. (2016). 出声阅读和默读之间的差异.心理科学进展, 24(1), 21-30.
[6] 韩映虹, 李慧生, 闫国利, 张喜英. (2004). 小学生快速阅读的眼动实验研究及对语文教学的启示.天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2, 73-76.
[7] 理查德·格里格, 菲利普·津巴多. (2003). 心理学与生活(第16版)(王垒, 王甦等译). 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 197.
[8] 李赛男. (2018). 小学2-5年级学生汉语阅觉广度发展的眼动研究. 天津师范大学硕士学位论文.
[9] 刘妮娜, 王娟, 闫国利. (2012). 快速阅读训练对小学生阅读效果影响的实验研究.天津师范大学学报(基础教育版), 13(1), 63-67.
[10] Michael S Gazzaniga, Richard B lvry., George R Mangun.(2011). 认知神经科学-关于心智的生物学(周晓林, 高定国等译). 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 152-157.
[11] 田宏杰, 朱莹, 韩映虹, 闫国利, 钟莉,陈连燕, 郭洁,孙媛. (2004). 小学生快速阅读的眼动研究.心理与行为研究, 2(4), 630-633.
[12] 王丽红, 白学军,闫国利. (2014). 汉语阅读知觉广度的老化:一项眼动研究.心理与行为研究, 12(6), 763-768.
[13] 现代汉语词典(第六版). (2012). 北京:商务印书馆.
[14] 熊建萍, 闫国利, 白学军. (2009). 不同年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究.心理科学, 32(3), 584-587.
[15] 闫国利, 伏干,白学军. (2008). 不同难度阅读材料对阅读知觉广度影响的眼动研究.心理科学, 31(6), 1287-1290.
[16] 闫国利, 李赛男, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 王丽红. (2018). 小学二年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究.心理科学, 41(4), 849-855.
[17] 闫国利, 吕勇. (2002). 快速阅读的理论与实践. 兰州: 兰州大学出版社.
[18] 闫国利, 孙莎莎, 张巧明,白学军. (2014). 自然阅读与校对阅读的知觉广度研究.心理科学, 37(2), 298-302.
[19] 闫国利, 王丽红, 巫金根, 白学军. (2011). 不同年级学生阅读知觉广度及预视效益的眼动研究.心理学报, 43(3), 249-263.
[20] 闫国利, 巫金根, 胡晏雯,白学军. (2010). 当前阅读的眼动研究范式述评.心理科学进展, 18(12), 1966-1976.
[21] 闫国利, 巫金根, 王丽红. (2013). 小学五年级语文学优生与学困生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究.心理科学, 36(3), 622-626.
[22] 闫国利, 巫金根, 臧传丽,白学军. (2010). 阅读知觉广度眼动研究述评. 心理学探新, 30, 23-28.
[23] 闫国利, 熊建萍, 白学军. (2008). 小学五年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究.心理发展与教育, 1, 72-77.
[24] 闫国利, 张巧明,白学军. (2013). 中文阅读知觉广度的影响因素研究.心理发展与教育, 29(2), 121-130.
[25] Balota, D. A., & Rayner, K. (1991). Word recognition processes in foveal and parafoveal vision: The range of influence of lexical variables. In D. Besner& G. W. Humphreys (Eds.). Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition(pp. 198-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[26] Calef T., Pieper M., & Coffey B. (1999). Comparisons of eye movements before and after a speed-reading course.Journal of the American Optometric Association, 70, 171-181.
[27] Carver, R. P. (1972, August). Speed readers don't read, they skim.Psychology Today, pp. 22-30.
[28] Dyson, M. C., & Haselgrove, M. (2000). The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen.Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 210-223.
[29] Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 24(1), 20-34.
[30] Just M. A., Carpenter P. A., & Masson, M. E. J. (1982). What eye fixations tell us about speed reading and skimming. Eye-Lab Technical Report, Carnegie-Mellon University.
[31] Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
[32] Liddle, W. (1965). An investigation of the Wood Reading Dynamics method (Doctoral dissertation). University of Delaware, Newark.
[33] Masson, M. E. J. (1982). Cognitive processes in skimming stories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 400-417.
[34] McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading.Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
[35] Pollatsek A., Raney G. E., Lagasse L., & Rayner K. (1993). The use of information below fixation in reading and in visual search.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(2), 179-200.
[36] Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41(2), 211-236.
[37] Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: Twenty years of research.Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
[38] Rayner, K. (2009). The Thirty-Fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading, scene perception, and visual search.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506.
[39] Rayner K., Schotter E. R., Masson M. E., Potter M. C., & Treiman R. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help?Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4-34.
[40] Sperlich A., Meixner J., & Laubrock J. (2016). Development of the perceptual span in reading: A longitudinal study.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 146, 181-201.
[41] Sperlich A., Schad D. J., & Laubrock J. (2015). When preview information starts to matter: Development of the perceptual span in German beginning readers.Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 511-530.
[42] Su J., Yin G., Bai X., Yan G., Kurtev S., Warrington K. L., Paterson K. B. (2020). Flexibility in the perceptual span during reading: Evidence from Mongolian.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(4), 1566-1572.
[43] Wilkinson S. C., Reader W., & Payne S. J. (2012). Adaptive browsing: Sensitivity to time pressure and task difficulty. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 14-25.
[44] World Speed Reading Council. (2008). Retrieved from http://www.mentalworldrecords.com/worldspeedreadingcouncil/
[45] Yan M., Li H., Su Y., Cao Y., & Pan J. (2020). The perceptual span and individual differences among Chinese children.Scientific Studies of Reading, 1-11. |
|
|
|
