|
|
|
| From “subperson” to “avatar”： The theoretical space of metacosmic energization to enactive cognitive paradigm methodology |
| ZHOU Zhuozhao1,2, SHI Zifu1 |
1 School of Education and Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 41000;
2 Hainan Provincial Health Commission, Haikou 570000 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a new comprehensive concept of science and technology, the universe has swept the world. It has brought tremendous changes to cognitive science and other fields. At the same time, its theoretical and application advantages are emerging independently. Can the meta universe be combined with enactive cognition to promote the new generation of cognitive science research paradigm? Does it mean that the era of the first generation of cognitive science will be completely ended in the way of virtual reality symbiosis in the future, so as to enter the era of artificial intelligence research? What are the shortcomings of virtual reality symbiosis technology that cannot be realized? Where will cognitive psychology go in the future? Obviously, the "avatar" image created by the meta universe does not meet the demands of psychological cognitive subjects. Starting from the theoretical propositions that criticized the paradigms of mentalism, cognitivism, behaviorism, etc. For more than one hundred years, psychology is developing towards the direction of human being constructed by Marxist concept of practice, and creating research paradigms suitable for human beings. In addition, other non-human studies cannot be the purport of psychological research. On this basis, the author compares the theoretical propositions of meta cosmic cognition and enactive cognition, finds their similarities and differences, tries to explore the possibility of meta cosmic empowerment and generative cognition, and comments on them in combination with the Marxist concept of practice. Marxist philosophy not only has a strong dialectical logic and theoretical inclusiveness, but also has a more reasonable interpretation of human nature, which is more suitable for the healthy development of psychological theory. However, it should not comment on the meta universe prematurely, depending on its future development direction and recognition of its convenience and innovation for human life. Psychological theory should not only develop healthily, but also learn from the latest science and technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 埃文·汤普森. (2013). 生命中的心智. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社.
[2] 陈占霞. (2018). 马克思人的全面发展思想及其当代价值. 吉林大学硕士学位论文.
[3] 刁生富, 彭钰舒.(2022).元宇宙视域中人的主体性的消解与重构. 长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版),(05), 20-26+48.
[4] 高承实. (2022). 数字化转型:从信息互联网到元宇宙. 张江科技评论, (3), 4.
[5] 葛鲁嘉. (2008). 心理资源论——心理学的历史、现实和未来的形态. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (06), 104-108.
[6] 彭兰. (2022). 虚实混融:元宇宙中的空间与身体. 新闻大学,(06), 1-18+119.
[7] 彭运石. (2002). 心理学的整合视野. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, (01), 107-112.
[8] 彭运石. (2009). 人的消解与重构——西方心理学方法论研究. 长沙: 湖南教育出版社.
[9] 皮亚杰. (1997). 发生认识论原理(汉译世界学术名著丛书). 北京: 商务印书馆.
[10] 李林福. (2022). 极简元宇宙. 北京: 中国出版集团,26.
[11] 李其维, 弗内歇. (2000). 皮亚杰发生认识论若干问题再思考. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),(05), 3-10+73-123.
[12] 刘慧玲. (2008). “四维一体”视野中的心理与文化(硕士学位论文, 湖南师范大学).
[13] 李建会. (2017). 心灵的形式化及其挑战. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 65.
[14] 林天强. (2022). 元宇宙权: 基于幸福数字经济学与数字生产生活方式. 人工智能, (05), 12-21.
[15] 林锋, 毕秋. (2021).实践观的初次表述究竟在马克思的何文中?——《1844年经济学哲学手稿》的实践观及其价值. 北京行政学院学报, (06), 58-64.
[16] 王文玉. (2022). 元宇宙的主要特征、社会风险与治理方案. 科学学研究, 1-14.
[17] 袁平, 周卓钊. (2019).从常识心理学到激进生成主义.(eds.)第二十二届全国心理学学术会议摘要集(pp.1710-1711).
[18] 喻国明, 陈雪娇. (2022).数字资产:元宇宙时代的全新媒介——数字资产对传播价值链的激活、整合与再连接. 出版发行研究, (07), 21-29.
[19] 朱嘉明. (2022). 元宇宙和后人类社会. 商业周刊(中文版), (4), 5.
[20] 左鹏飞. (2022). 元宇宙的主要特征、发展态势及风险研判.社会科学辑刊.
[21] 曾军. (2022). “元宇宙”的发展阶段及文化特征. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),(04), 98-105+177-178.
[22] 张昌盛. (2021). 人工智能、缸中之脑与虚拟人生——对元宇宙问题的跨学科研究. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), (12), 52-63.
[23] 赵国栋、 易欢欢、 徐远重、 邢杰、 余晨. (2021). 元宇宙和元宇宙通证(全2册). 北京: 中译出版社.
[24] 张竑. (2019). 虚拟实践研究(博士学位论文,中共中央党校).
[25] 张心怡. (2022). 百人访谈|赵国栋:“元宇宙”就是五十年前的互联网. 大数据时代, (02),22-33.
[26] 张博. (2018)从离身心智到具身心智: 认知心理学研究范式的困境与转向. 吉林大学博士学位论文.
[27] 子弥实验室 2140弥实验室 2140. (2022). 元宇宙:图说元宇宙. 北京: 北京大学出版社. |
|
|
|
