|
|
|
| The metaverse and embedded cognition： Cognitive problems in mixed reality |
| ZHANG Bo1, GE Lujia2 |
1 School of Educational Science, Yili Normal University, Yining 835000;
2 School of Philosophy and Sociology, Jilin University, Changchun 130000 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Examples of the controversial issues between embedded cognition and extended cognition typically involve the use of technologically low-grade bio-external resources. Research in the field of metaverse allows people to rethink the above question in a new context. By investigating the hybrid cognitive circuits in metaverse, it can be found that embedded cognition not only has the same explanatory effect as extended cognition, but also conforms more to the principle of conservatism or simplicity. The relationship between the cognitive subject and mixed reality and virtual experience is more causal rather than constitutive. If we ignore the ontological differences between the metaverse and the real world may weaken the subjectivity of the body in cognitive activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 于小晶. (2017). 4E认知: 因果性与构成性的判定.科学技术哲学研究, 34(5), 43-49.
[2] 赵汀阳. (2022). 假如元宇宙成为一个存在论事件.江海学刊, (1), 27-37.
[3] 张洪忠, 斗维红, 任吴炯. (2022). 元宇宙: 具身传播的场景想象.新闻界, (1), 76-84.
[4] Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition, Oxford: Blackwell.
[5] Adams, F. (2018). Cognition wars.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 68, 20-30.
[6] Allen, C. (2017). On (not) defining cognition.Synthese, 194(11), 4233-4249.
[7] Aizawa, K. (2018). Extended cognition, trust and glue, and knowledge.Extended Epistemology, 64-78.
[8] Aagaard, J. (2021). 4E cognition and the dogma of harmony.Philosophical Psychology, 34(2), 165-181.
[9] Baumgartner, M., & Wilutzky, W. (2017). Is it possible to experimentally determine the extension of cognition? Philosophical Psychology, 30(8), 1104-1125.
[10] Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind.Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
[11] Clark, A. (2010). Memento's revenge: The extended mind, extended. The extended mind, 43-66.
[12] Craver, C. (2007). Constitutive explanatory relevance.Journal of Philosophical Research, 32, 3-20.
[13] Craver C. F., Glennan S., & Povich M. (2021). Constitutive relevance & mutual manipulability revisited.Synthese, 199(3), 8807-8828.
[14] Farina, M. (2021). Embodied cognition: Dimensions, domains and applications.Adaptive Behavior, 29(1), 73-88.
[15] Goldstone, R. L., & Theiner, G. (2017). The multiple, interacting levels of cognitive systems (MILCS) perspective on group cognition.Philosophical Psychology, 30(3), 338-372.
[16] Hoenig W., Milanes C., Scaria L., Phan T., Bolas M., & Ayanian N. (2015). Mixed reality for robotics. In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEM. 5382-5387.
[17] Harinen, T. (2018). Mutual manipulability and causal inbetweenness.Synthese, 195(1), 35-54.
[18] Kaplan, D. M. (2012). How to demarcate the boundaries of cognition.Biology & Philosophy, 27(4), 545-570.
[19] Kye B., Han N., Kim E., Park, Y. & Jo, S. (2021). Educational applications of metaverse: Possibilities and limitations.Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18(32), 1-13.
[20] Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays.IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
[21] Miłkowski M., Clowes R., Rucińska Z., Przegalińska A., Zawidzki T., Krueger J., ... & Hohol M. (2018). From wide cognition to mechanisms: A silent revolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 2393.
[22] Moro C., Phelps C., Redmond P., & Stromberga Z. (2021). HoloLens and mobile augmented reality in medical and health science education: A randomised controlled trial.British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 680-694.
[23] Newen, A., Bruin, L.& Gallagher, S. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition, New York: Oxford University Press.
[24] Park S., Bokijonov S., & Choi Y. (2021). Review of Microsoft Hololens applications over the past five years.Applied Sciences, 11(16), 7259.
[25] Prychitko, E. (2021). The causal situationist account of constitutive relevance.Synthese, 198(2), 1829-1843.
[26] Rupert, R.D. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition.The Journal of Philosophy, 101(8), 389-428.
[27] Rupert, R. D. (2010). Extended cognition and the priority of cognitive systems.Cognitive Systems Research, 11(4), 343-356.
[28] Rokhsaritalemi, S., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. & Choi, S. M. (2020). A review on mixed reality: Current trends, challenges and prospects.Applied Sciences, 10(2), 636.
[29] Speicher M., Hall B. D., & Nebeling M. (2019). What is mixed reality? In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1-15.
[30] Smart, P. (2022). Minds in the metaverse: Extended cognition meets mixed reality.Philosophy & Technology, 35(4), 1-29.
[31] Smart, P. R. (2022). Toward a mechanistic account of extended cognition.Philosophical Psychology, 1-29.
[32] Uspenski, I., & Guga, J. (2022). Embodying metaverse as artificial life: At the intersection of media and 4E cognition theories.Philosophy and Society, 33(2), 326-345.
[33] van Eck, D., & de Jong, H. L. (2016). Mechanistic explanation, cognitive systems demarcation, and extended cognition.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 59, 11-21.
[34] Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636.
[35] Zhang G., Cao J., Liu D., & Qi J. (2022). Popularity of the metaverse: Embodied social presence theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. |
|
|
|
