|
|
|
| Why the BoBo doll experiment is so important? |
| JIANG Ke1,2, LIN Chunting2 |
1. School of Mental Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035;
2. Corning Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Albert Bandura is one of the most influential psychologists in the 20th century. The BoBo doll experiment is a landmark experiment constructed by Bandura’s theory. Four studies on the “Bandura’s experiment” had reported not only reveals the process of Bandura’s gradual focus from specific themes to overall theoretical construction, but the research results also revealed some “invisible things”. Therefore, careful and in-depth analysis of the “BoBo doll experiment” will not only help us gain a deeper understanding of the evolution and construction process of social learning theory, but also enable us to better understand how it promotes psychology from behaviorism to transform of cognitivism. Finally, the “BoBo doll experiment” as an experimental paradigm and a symbolic had signed that psychology research affects social reality has extremely important historical significance in the history of psychology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Bandura, A., & Benton, A. L. (1953). “Primary” and “secondary” suggestibility.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43, 336-340.
[2] Bandura, A. (1954). The Rorschach white space response and perceptual reversal.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 113-117.
[3] Bandura, A. (1957). Review of case studies in childhood emotional disabilities (Vol. 2) by G. Gardner.Contemporary Psychology, 2, 14-15.
[4] Bandura, A. (1958). Child-rearing patterns associated with adolescent aggressive disorders. In Physical and behavioral growth. Columbus, OH: Ross Laboratories.
[5] Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1958). Dependency conflicts in aggressive delinquents.Journal of Social Issues, 14, 52-65.
[6] Bandura A.,& Walters, R. H., (1959). Adolescent aggression. New York: Ronald Press, 1959.
[7] Bandura A., Lipsher D. H., & Miller P. E. (1960). Psychotherapists’ approach-avoidance reactions to patients’ expression of hostility.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 1-8.
[8] Bandura, A. (1961). Psychotherapy as a learning process.Psychological Bulletin, 58, 143-159.
[9] Bandura, A., & Huston, A. C. (1961). Identification as a process of incidental learning.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 311-318.
[10] Bandura A., Ross D., & Ross S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-582.
[11] Bandura, A. (1962). Social learning through imitation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
[12] Bandura A., Ross, D. & Ross, S. A. (1963). A comparative test of the status envy, social. power, and secondary reinforcement theories of identificatory learning.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 527-534.
[13] Bandura A., Ross D., & Ross S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 3-11.
[14] Bandura A., Ross D., & Ross S. A. (1963). Vicarious reinforcement and imitative learning.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 601-607.
[15] Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 589-595. |
|
|
|
