|
|
|
| The psychological structure of self-other focused and their relationship with advice taking： A nomological network perspective |
| REN Xiaoyun1, SHI Xinguang2, ZHANG Kaihua3, DUAN Jinyun3 |
1 School of Economic and Management, Zhejiang SCI-TECH University, Hangzhou 310018;
2 School of Urban Govermance and Public Affairs, Suzhou City University, Suzhou 215104;
3 School of Education, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract According to the cognitive-affective personality system, individual traits are built on the interaction between the individual and the environment, which is characterized as dynamic, flexible, and adaptive. The present study considerd self-focused and other-focused as two different traits and aimed to explore these two concepts’ content and structure in terms of the orientation and allocation of attention as well as their effect on advice taking. We conducted a semi-structured interview and a nomological network in two studies. The results indicated that self-focused and other-focused attention were two different and independent traits, the former contains self-existence, positive self, and self-management, whereas the latter contained other existence, respect for others, and interactive behaviors. In addition, people with higher other-focused traits were more likely to adopt advice. Our findings contribute to the research on self-other-focused attention and advice-taking literature. The implications, limitations, and future orientations of the present research were discussed as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 段锦云. (2012). 员工建言和沉默之间的关系研究:诺莫网络视角. 南开管理评论, 15, 82-90.
[2] 段锦云, 古晓花, 孙露莹. (2016). 外显自尊、内隐自尊及其分离对建议采纳的影响.心理学报, 48, 371-384.
[3] 段锦云, 孙佚思. (2019). 建议的表面采纳的测量方法. 心理科学, 42, 402-406.
[4] 孙露莹, 陈琳, 段锦云. (2017). 决策过程中的建议采纳: 策略、影响及未来展望.心理科学进展, 25, 169-179.
[5] 张凤凤, 董毅, 汪凯, 詹志禹, 谢伦芳. (2010). 中文版人际反应指针量表(Iri-c)的信度及效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志, 18, 155-157.
[6] Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2006). Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 127-151.
[7] Chiou, W. B., & Lee, C. C. (2013). Enactment of one-to-many communication may induce self-focused attention that leads to diminished perspective taking: The case of Facebook. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 372-380.
[8] Cronbach, L. J., Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
[9] Demarree, K. G., & Loersch, C. (2009). Who am i and who are you? Priming and the influence of self versus other focused attention.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 440-443.
[10] Dreu, D., & Carsten, K. W. (2006). Rational self-interest and other orientation in organizational behavior: A critical appraisal and extension of Meglino and Korsgaard (2004). Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1245-1252.
[11] Gendolla, G. H. E., & Wicklund, R. A. (2009). Self-focused attention, perspective-taking, and false consensus.Social Psychology, 40, 66-72.
[12] Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2013). Does power help or hurt? The moderating role of self-other focus on power and perspective-taking in romantic relationships.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1097-1110.
[13] Hamilton N. A.,& Ingram, R. E. (2001). Self-focused attention and coping: Attending to the right thing. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping with stress: Effective people and processes (pp. 178-195). New York: Oxford University Press.
[14] Han, J., & Ling, J. (2016). Emotional appeal in recruitment advertising and applicant attraction: Unpacking national cultural differences.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 1-22.
[15] Herzberg, F. (2003). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 81, 87-96.
[16] Ingram, R. E. (1990a). Attentional non specificity in depressive and generalized anxious affective states. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 25-35.
[17] Ingram, R. E. (1990b). Self-focused attention in clinical disorders: Review and a conceptual modal.Psychological Bulletin, 107, 156-176.
[18] Judge T. A., Erez A., Bono J. E., & Thoresen C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure.Personnel Psychology, 56, 303-331.
[19] Kogan A., Impett E. A., Oveis C., Hui B., Gordon A. M., & Keltner D. (2010). When giving feels good: The intrinsic benefits of sacrifice in romantic relationships for the communally motivated.Psychological Science, 21, 1918-1924.
[20] Kraus M. W., Tan J. J. X., & Tannenbaum M. B. (2013). The social ladder: A rank-based perspective on social class.Psychological Inquiry, 24, 81-96.
[21] Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. A. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure.Psychological Review, 106, 246-268.
[22] Mor, N., & Winquist, J. (2002). Self-focused attention and negative affect: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 128, 638-662.
[23] Na J., Mcdonough I. M., Chan M. Y., & Park D. C. (2016). Social-class differences in consumer choices: Working-class individuals are more sensitive to choices of others than middle-class individuals.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 430-443.
[24] Shafer, A. B. (1999). Brief bipolar markers for the five factor model of personality. Psychological Reports, 84, 1173-1179.
[25] Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591.
[26] Sniezek, J. A., & Buckley, T. (1995). Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 159-174.
[27] Sniezek J. A., Schrah G. E., & Dalal R. S. (2004). Improving judgement with prepaid expert advice.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 173-190.
[28] Soll, J. B., & Mannes, A. E. (2011). Judgmental aggregation strategies depend on whether the self is involved.International Journal of Forecasting, 27, 81-102.
[29] Yaniv I., Choshen-Hillel S., & Milyavsky M. (2011). Receiving advice on matters of taste: Similarity, majority influence, and taste discrimination.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 111-120. |
|
|
|
