多维度触觉隐喻对个体判断与人际互动行为的影响及其作用机制

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2025.01.002

Psychological Research

2025, Vol. 18

Issue (1): 11-19 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2025.01.002

Fundamental Research

Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

The effect of haptic metaphor from different dimensions on individual judgment and interactive behavior and its mental mechanism

LI Ying^1,2, LI Xinyan³, ZHANG Can⁴, WANG Yue¹

1 The School of Education, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001;
2 Henan Key Laboratory of Imaging and Intelligent Processing, Zhengzhou 450001;
3 Psychological Health Education Center, Henan University of Engineering, Zhengzhou 451100;
4 The School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (1061 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The haptic experience is part of human body experience. Embodied cognition theory assumes that physical experience participates in and influences cognition. This research discussed the metaphoric mapping relationship between haptic experience and abstract concepts and its impact on individual judgment and human interactive behavior from different dimensions including soft and hard, rough and smooth, and also temperature haptic. Based on that, the paper further discussed about the mental mechanism underlying it and the interaction among different haptic metaphors. It is possible for future researches to pay more attention on the role of emotion in haptic metaphors, to enrich research methods and experimental techniques, and to strengthen possible applications of haptic metaphor in different areas.

Key words： haptic metaphor judgment interactive behavior mental mechanism

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Ying
	LI Xinyan
	ZHANG Can
	WANG Yue

Cite this article:

LI Ying,LI Xinyan,ZHANG Can, et al. The effect of haptic metaphor from different dimensions on individual judgment and interactive behavior and its mental mechanism[J]. Psychological Research, 2025, 18(1): 11-19.

URL:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/EN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2025.01.002 OR http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/EN/Y2025/V18/I1/11

[1] 丁毅, 纪婷婷, 邹文谦, 刘燕, 冉光明, 陈旭. (2013). 物理温度向社会情感的隐喻映射:作用机制及其解释.心理科学进展, 21(6), 1133-1140.
[2] 丁瑛, 宫秀双. (2016). 社会排斥对产品触觉信息偏好的影响及其作用机制.心理学报, 48(10), 1302-1313.
[3] 贺晓玲, 陈俊. (2020). 3~5岁幼儿权力概念多重隐喻的认知发展.心理学报, 52(2), 149-161.
[4] 黎晓丹, 杜建政, 叶浩生. (2016). 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应:蜷缩的身体使人更卑微.心理学报, 48(006), 746-756.
[5] 李莹, 张灿, 王悦. (2019). 道德情绪在道德隐喻映射中的作用及其神经机制.心理科学进展, 27(7), 1224-1231.
[6] 刘传军, 廖江群. (2018). 具身效应何处寻:解决可重复性危机的分析性途径.心理科学进展, 26(12), 2260-2271.
[7] 汪新筱, 严秀英, 张积家, 董方虹.(2017).平辈亲属词语义加工中长幼概念的空间隐喻和重量隐喻——来自中国朝鲜族和汉族的证据.心理学报, 49(2),174-185.
[8] 魏华, 段海岑, 周宗奎. (2018). 具身认知视角下的消费者行为.心理科学进展, 26(7), 1294-1306.
[9] 吴言动, 喻丰, 彭凯平, 刘书青. (2019). 心真的会“软”吗?软硬感受与语义改变道德判断.心理学探新, 39(6), 571-574.
[10] 叶浩生. (2010). 具身认知: 认知心理学的新取向.心理科学进展, 18(5), 705-710.
[11] 易仲怡, 杨文登, 叶浩生. (2018). 具身认知视角下软硬触觉经验对性别角色认知的影响.心理学报, 50(7), 793-802.
[12] 於文苑, 刘烨, 傅小兰, 龚江涛, 徐迎庆. (2019). 触觉二维图像识别的认知机制.心理科学进展, 27(4), 611-622.
[13] 袁小婷,叶浩生. (2018). 具身认知一体论:二元还是一元?心理研究, 11(2), 100-105.
[14] 张积家, 付雅, 王斌. (2020). 文化影响亲属词性别概念加工中的空间隐喻与重量隐喻——来自彝族,白族和摩梭人的证据.心理学报, 52(4), 440-455.
[15] 钟科, 王海忠, 杨晨. (2014). 感官营销战略在服务失败中的运用:触觉体验缓解顾客抱怨的实证研究.中国工业经济, (1), 114-126.
[16] Ackerman J. M., Nocera C. C., & Bargh J. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328(5986), 1712-1715.
[17] Anderson C. A., Anderson K. B., Dorr N., DeNeve K. M., & Flanagan M. (2000). Temperature and aggression.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 63-133.
[18] Bargh, J. A., & Shalev, I. (2012). The substitutability of physical and social warmth in daily life.Emotion, 12, 154-162.
[19] Cheon B. K., Tan K. M., & Lee L. L. (2019). Tender food, tender hearts: The metaphorical mapping of hard-soft orosensory signals to interpersonal trust and prosocial tendencies. Food Quality and Preference, 71, 242-249.
[20] Fay, A. J., & Maner, J. K. (2012). Warmth, spatial proximity, and social attachment: The embodied perception of a social metaphor.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1369-1372.
[21] George J. A., Kluger D. T., Davis T. S., Wendelken S. M., Okorokova E. V., He Q., .. Clark G. A. (2019). Biomimetic sensory feedback through peripheral nerve stimulation improves dexterous use of a bionic hand. Science Robotics, 4, eaax2352.
[22] Harris J. A., Miniussi C., Harris I. M., & Diamond M. E. (2002). Transient storage of a tactile memory trace in primary somatosensory cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 22(19), 8720-8725.
[23] Hutmacher, F., & Kuhbandner, C. (2018). Long-term memory for haptically explored objects: Fidelity, durability, incidental encoding, and cross-modal transfer.Psychological Science, 29(12), 2031-2038.
[24] IJzerman H., Leung A. K., & Ong L.S. (2014). See Perceptual symbols of creativity: Coldness elicits referential, warmth elicits relational creativity.Acta Psychologica, 148, 136-147.
[25] Ikeda, T., & Takeda, Y. (2019). Holding soft objects increases expectation and disappointment in the Cyberball task.PloS One, 14(4), e0215772.
[26] Ikeda, T., & Takeda, Y. (2021). Effects of holding soft objects during Cyberball tasks under frequent positive feedback. Experimental Brain Research, 239, 667-674.
[27] Inagaki, T. K., & Eisenberger, N.I. (2013). Shared neural mechanisms underlying social warmth and physical warmth.Psychological Science, 24(11), 2272-2280.
[28] Jamrozik A., McQuire M., Cardillo E. R., & Chatterjee A. (2016). Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1080-1089.
[29] Jha S., Balaji M. S., Peck J., Oakley J., & Deitz G. D. (2020). The effects of environmental haptic cues on consumer perceptions of retailer warmth and competence. Journal of Retailing, 1-16.
[30] Kang Y., Williams L. E., Clark M. S., Gray J. R., & Bargh J. A. (2011). Physical temperature effects on trust behavior: The role of insula.Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 507-515.
[31] Kaspar, K. & Klane, A. (2017). Embodied information affects judgements about politicians: The impact of haptic weight sensations and hand cleansing. International Journal of Psychology, 52, 97-105.
[32] Kierkels J.,& van den Hoven, E. (2008). Children's haptic experiences of tangible artifacts varying in hardness. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer Interaction: Building bridges (pp. 221-228). New York: ACM Press.
[33] Kim, J. (2015). Physical activity benefits creativity: Squeezing a ball for enhancing creativity.Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 328-333.
[34] Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332-351.
[35] Krishna A., Elder R. S., & Caldara C. (2010). Feminine to smell but masculine to touch? Multisensory congruence and its effect on the aesthetic experience.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 410-418.
[36] Lacey S., Stilla R., & Sathian K. (2012). Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex.Brain & Language, 120(3), 416-421.
[37] Langner T., Fischer A., & Brune P. (2013). Choose your Ad paper type carefully: How haptic Ad paper characteristics affect product judgments.Advances in Advertising Research, IV, 19-27.
[38] Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (2009). Haptic perception: A tutorial.Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 71(7), 1439-1459.
[39] Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition.Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 342-368.
[40] Lin H. M., Yen Y. X., & Lin H. C. (2017). The effects of temperature and need for touch on variety-seeking behavior.Management Review, 36, 121-132.
[41] Luo S. Y., Han X. C., Du N., & Han S. H. (2018). Physical coldness enhances racial in-group bias in empathy: Electrophysiological evidence.Neuropsychologia, 116, 117-125.
[42] Martinovic J., Lawson R., & Craddock M. (2012). Time course of information processing in visual and haptic object classification.Fronties in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1-11.
[43] Miguel H. O., Gonçalves O. F., Cruz S., & Sampaio A. (2019). Infant brain response to affective and discriminative touch: A longitudinal study using fNIRS.Social Neuroscience, 14(5), 571-582.
[44] Nakamura H., Ito Y., Honma Y., Mori T., & Kawaguchi J. (2014). Cold-hearted or cool-headed: Physical coldness promotes utilitarian moral judgment.Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1086.
[45] Park J., & Hadi R., (2019). Shivering for status: When cold temperatures increase product evaluation.Journal of Consumer Psychology, doi:10.1002/jcpy.1133.
[46] Ruggiero G., Rapuano M., & Iachini T. (2019). Perceived temperature modulates peripersonal and interpersonal spaces differently in men and women.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 52-59.
[47] Schaefer M., Cherkasskiy L., Denke C., Spies C., Song H., & Malahy S., .. Bargh J. A. (2018). Incidental haptic sensations influence judgment of crimes.Scientific Reports, 8(1), 6039.
[48] Schaefer M., Denke C., Heinze H. J., & Rotte M. (2014). Rough primes and rough conversations: Evidence for a modality-specific basis to mental metaphors.Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 9(11), 1653-1659.
[49] Schaefer M., Cherkasskiy L., Denke C., Spies C., Song H., Malahy S., Heinz A., Ströhle A., Schäfer M., Mianroudi N., Bargh J. A. (2020) Empathy-related brain activity in somatosensory cortex protects from tactile priming effects: A pilot study.Fronties in Human Neuroscience, 14, 142.
[50] Slepian M. L., Weisbuch M., Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2011). Tough and tender: Embodied categorization of gender.Psychological Science, 22(1), 26-28.
[51] Tai K., Zheng X., & Narayanan J. (2011). Touching a teddy bear mitigates the negative effects of social exclusion.Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 618-626.
[52] Tu Y. J., Ma C. Q., Wu Y. Y., & Yang Z. (2018). Passive body touch and perceived intensity of spice: Softer means spicier.British Food Journal, 120(4), 864-875.
[53] Van Horen, F., & Mussweiler, T. (2014). Soft assurance: Coping with uncertainty through haptic sensations.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 73-80.
[54] Wang C., Zhu R., & Handy T. C. (2015). Experiencing haptic roughness promotes empathy.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(3), 350-362.
[55] Wei W. Q., Ma J. J., & Wang L. (2015). The ‘warm’ side of coldness: Cold promotes interpersonal warmth in negative contexts.British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(4), 712-727.
[56] Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth.Science, 322, 606-607.
[57] Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636.
[58] Zhang, Y., & Risen, J. L. (2014). Embodied motivation: Using a goal systems framework to understand the preference for social and physical warmth.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(6), 965-977.
[59] Zhong, C. B., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19, 838-842.
[60] Zhong K., Wang Y., & Wang H. (2020). Sense hardness: Effect of haptic perception on consumer attitudes towards brand extension.Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 1-15.