共同内群体认同对群际威胁引发攻击行为的调节作用

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.02.007

心理研究

2023, Vol. 16

Issue (2): 153-160 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.02.007

基础研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

共同内群体认同对群际威胁引发攻击行为的调节作用

王沛¹, 韩彩霞², 丁川²

1 华东师范大学教育学部,上海 200062;
2 上海师范大学心理学系,上海 200234

The moderating effect of common in-group identity on inter-group threat triggered aggression in healthcare

WANG Pei¹, HAN Caixia², DING Chuan²

1 Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062;
2 Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (990 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要基于群际威胁理论和共同内群体认同模型,以恶性医患失谐事件为启动材料,采用竞争反应时范式（CRT）和内隐联想范式（IAT）从外显和内隐层面探究了共同内群体认同对群际威胁引发攻击行为的调节作用。结果发现,群际威胁组个体的外显和内隐攻击性显著高于非威胁组;有共同内群体认同的个体的外显和内隐攻击性显著低于无共同内群体认同组的个体;在无威胁的条件下,有无共同内群体认同对个体的外显和内隐攻击性没有较大影响,但在威胁条件下有共同内群体认同的个体的外显和内隐攻击性显著低于无群际威胁组的个体。上述结果表明,群际威胁会引发个体的攻击行为,共同内群体认同能够降低个体因群际威胁而产生的攻击强度。因此,降低医患群际威胁感知、构建医患共同内群体认同对医患失谐的消解具有重要意义。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王沛
	韩彩霞
	丁川

关键词 ：群际威胁, 共同内群体认同, 竞争反应时范式（CRT）, 内隐联想测验（IAT）

基金资助:国家社会科学重大招标项目（17ZDA327）

通讯作者: 王沛,男,教授,博士生导师。Email：wangpei1970@163.com

引用本文:

王沛, 韩彩霞, 丁川. 共同内群体认同对群际威胁引发攻击行为的调节作用[J]. 心理研究, 2023, 16(2): 153-160.
WANG Pei, HAN Caixia, DING Chuan. The moderating effect of common in-group identity on inter-group threat triggered aggression in healthcare. Psychological Research, 2023, 16(2): 153-160.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.02.007 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2023/V16/I2/153

[1] 陈竺. (2009). 医患双方实质上是“利益共同体”. 人民日报, 12-10, (008).
[2] 戴春林, 杨治良, 吴明证. (2005). 内隐攻击性的实验研究. 心理科学, 28(1), 96-98.
[3] 管健, 荣杨. (2020). 共同内群体认同:建构包摄水平更高的上位认同. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 57(1), 39-49.
[4] 贺雯, 朱佳丽, 孙亚文, 王晓兰,柏涌海. (2018). 元刻板印象威胁对医患关系的影响:群际焦虑的中介作用. 中国社会心理学评论, 14, 74-84.
[5] 艾娟. (2018). 医患失谐情境下的竞争受害者心理及其对策. 中国社会心理学评论, 1, 63-73.
[6] 李昭旭, 张进, 朱丽燕, 尹红艳, 刘国栋, 及崇岩,... 于金凤. (2019). 中国医患失谐根源的时代特点及社会治理策略. 中国医院管理, 39(12), 65-67.
[7] 刘伟, 梁立波, 薛乔丹, 陶思怡, 宋韦剑, 薛羽芯,孙明雷. (2020). 网络舆情对医患关系影响的文献分析. 医学与社会, 33(4), 6-9.
[8] 潘新丽. (2015).“共同体”的分离与重建:当代医患关系的医学哲学思考.华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 29(02), 109-113.
[9] 吕小康, 朱振达. (2016). 医患社会心态建设的社会心理学视角. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2, 110-116.
[10] 孙连荣, 杨治良. (2013). 社会偏见与群际威胁在群际冲突发生过程中的作用. 心理科学, 36(4), 949-955.
[11] 孙莹炜, 李义庭.(2020).和谐医患命运共同体建设的思考. 医学与哲学, (02), 44-46.
[12] 王俊秀, 周迎楠, 裴福华. (2021). 社会心理服务体系建设视角下铸牢中华民族共同体意识的路径——基于共同内群体认同理论. 民族学刊, 12(05), 17-23+108.
[13] 汪新建, 王丛. (2016). 医患信任关系的特征、现状与研究展望. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), (2), 102-109.
[14] 王沛, 孙连荣. (2019). 和谐医患关系的心理机制及其促进技术. 心理科学进展, 27(6), 957-964.
[15] 徐莉. (2016). 论防御性医疗行为与过度医疗行为的关系. 医学与社会, 29(2), 41-43.
[16] 尹红艳, 杨可心, 时宇, 张淑娥, 张敏, 王鸿妮, 赵鑫, 纪科宇, 程偲宇, 孙涛, 王小合. (2021).个体冲突跃迁为群际威胁:一个解释中国医患关系恶化成因的新视角. 医学与社会, 34(11), 70-73+78.
[17] 余明锋. (2020). 医患命运共同体何以可能?——从新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情的防控谈起.中国医学伦理学, 33(04), 395-399.
[18] 张婍, 冯江平, 王二平. (2009). 群际威胁的分类及其对群体偏见的影响. 心理科学进展, 17(2), 473-480.
[19] Arriaga P., Esteves F., Carneiro P., & Monteiro M. B. (2008). Are the effects of unreal violent video games pronounced when playing with a virtual reality system? Aggress Behav, 34(5), 521-538.
[20] Becker J. C., Wagner U., & Christ O. (2011). Consequences of the 2008 financial crisis for intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(6), 871-885.
[21] Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459.
[22] Chinese doctors are under threat. (2010). Lancet, 376(9742), 657.
[23] Crisp R. J., Stone C. H., & Hall N. R. (2006). Recategorization and subgroup identification: Predicting and preventing threats from common ingroups. Personality & Social Personality Bulletin, 32(2), 230-243.
[24] Dovidio J. F., Gaertner S. L., & Saguy T. (2010). Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 296-330.
[25] Gaertner S. L., Dovidio J. F., Anastasio P. A., Bachman B. A., & Rust M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4.
[26] Gaertner, S. L.et al.(2016). The common ingroup identity model and the development of a functional perspective: A cross-national collaboration. in Jorge Vala, Sven Waldzus and Maria M. Calheiros eds., The social developmental construction of violence and intergroup conflict, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 105-120.
[27] Iacoviello V., Lorenzi-Cioldi F., & Chipeaux M. (2018). The identification-similarity relationship as a function of ingroup status: A social identity perspective. Self and Identity, 18(6), 685-708.
[28] Ireland, J. L., & Adams, C. (2015). Implicit cognitive aggression among young male prisoners: Association with dispositional and current aggression. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 41, 89-94.
[29] Fuochi G., Boin J., Voci A., & Hewstone M. (2021). COVID-19 threat and perceptions of common belonging with outgroups: The roles of prejudice-related individual differences and intergroup contact. Personality and Individual Differences, 175. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110700
[30] Jackson, J. W. (1993). Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. Psychological Record, 43, 395-414.
[31] Reimer N. K., Kamble S. V., Schmid K., & Hewstone M. (2020). Intergroup contact fosters more inclusive social identities. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(1), 133-157.
[32] Kamans E., Otten S., & Gordijn E. H. (2010). Power and threat in intergroup conflict: How emotional and behavioral responses depend on amount and content of threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(3), 293-310.
[33] Levendusky, M. S. (2018). Americans, not Partisans: Can priming American national identity reduce affective polarization? The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 59-70.
[34] Niesta D., Fritsche I., & Jonas E. (2008). Mortality salience and its effects on peace processes: A review. Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 2-8.
[35] Petersen, M. B. (2017). Healthy out-group members are represented psychologically as infected in-group members. Psychological Science, 28(12), 1857-1863.
[36] Renfro C. L., Duran A., Stephan W. G., & Clason D. L. (2006). The role of threat in attitudes toward affirmative action and its beneficiaries Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 41-74.
[37] Riek B. M., Mania E. W., Gaertner S. L., McDonald S. A., & Lamoreaux M. J. (2010). Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(4), 403-423.
[38] Weisel Ori & Zultan Ro'i. (2021). Perceived level of threat and cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology, (12), doi:10.3389/FPSYG.2021.704338.
[39] Yang T., Zhang H., Shen F., Li J.-W., & Wu M.-C. (2013). Appeal from Chinese doctors to end violence. The Lancet, 382(9906), 1703-1704.