元宇宙与嵌入认知：混合现实中的认知问题

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.02.002

心理研究

2023, Vol. 16

Issue (2): 109-116 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.02.002

理论论坛

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

元宇宙与嵌入认知：混合现实中的认知问题

张博¹, 葛鲁嘉²

1 伊犁师范大学教育科学学院, 伊宁 835000;
2 吉林大学哲学社会学院, 长春 130000

The metaverse and embedded cognition： Cognitive problems in mixed reality

ZHANG Bo¹, GE Lujia²

1 School of Educational Science, Yili Normal University, Yining 835000;
2 School of Philosophy and Sociology, Jilin University, Changchun 130000

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (4)

全文: PDF (952 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要嵌入认知与延展认知之间争议问题的研究所涉及的案例,通常只是相对简单的外部资源的使用,元宇宙研究的兴起使人们可以在一种新的背景下重新思考上述问题。通过对元宇宙中混合认知回路的考察发现,嵌入认知不仅与延展认知具有相同的解释效力,而且更加符合保守性或简单性原则,认知主体与混合现实、虚拟经验之间的关系更像是因果依赖性的而非构成性的。如果忽视元宇宙与真实世界之间在存在论层面的差别,则可能削弱身体在认知活动中的主体性地位。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张博
	葛鲁嘉

关键词 ：元宇宙, 嵌入认知, 混合现实, 虚拟现实

基金资助:伊犁师范大学博士科研专项资助计划项目（BSZX2021007）

通讯作者: 葛鲁嘉,男,教授,博士生导师。Email：gelujia56@163.com

引用本文:

张博, 葛鲁嘉. 元宇宙与嵌入认知：混合现实中的认知问题[J]. 心理研究, 2023, 16(2): 109-116.
ZHANG Bo, GE Lujia. The metaverse and embedded cognition： Cognitive problems in mixed reality. Psychological Research, 2023, 16(2): 109-116.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.02.002 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2023/V16/I2/109

[1] 于小晶. (2017). 4E认知: 因果性与构成性的判定.科学技术哲学研究, 34(5), 43-49.
[2] 赵汀阳. (2022). 假如元宇宙成为一个存在论事件.江海学刊, (1), 27-37.
[3] 张洪忠, 斗维红, 任吴炯. (2022). 元宇宙: 具身传播的场景想象.新闻界, (1), 76-84.
[4] Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition, Oxford: Blackwell.
[5] Adams, F. (2018). Cognition wars.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 68, 20-30.
[6] Allen, C. (2017). On (not) defining cognition.Synthese, 194(11), 4233-4249.
[7] Aizawa, K. (2018). Extended cognition, trust and glue, and knowledge.Extended Epistemology, 64-78.
[8] Aagaard, J. (2021). 4E cognition and the dogma of harmony.Philosophical Psychology, 34(2), 165-181.
[9] Baumgartner, M., & Wilutzky, W. (2017). Is it possible to experimentally determine the extension of cognition? Philosophical Psychology, 30(8), 1104-1125.
[10] Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind.Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
[11] Clark, A. (2010). Memento's revenge: The extended mind, extended. The extended mind, 43-66.
[12] Craver, C. (2007). Constitutive explanatory relevance.Journal of Philosophical Research, 32, 3-20.
[13] Craver C. F., Glennan S., & Povich M. (2021). Constitutive relevance & mutual manipulability revisited.Synthese, 199(3), 8807-8828.
[14] Farina, M. (2021). Embodied cognition: Dimensions, domains and applications.Adaptive Behavior, 29(1), 73-88.
[15] Goldstone, R. L., & Theiner, G. (2017). The multiple, interacting levels of cognitive systems (MILCS) perspective on group cognition.Philosophical Psychology, 30(3), 338-372.
[16] Hoenig W., Milanes C., Scaria L., Phan T., Bolas M., & Ayanian N. (2015). Mixed reality for robotics. In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEM. 5382-5387.
[17] Harinen, T. (2018). Mutual manipulability and causal inbetweenness.Synthese, 195(1), 35-54.
[18] Kaplan, D. M. (2012). How to demarcate the boundaries of cognition.Biology & Philosophy, 27(4), 545-570.
[19] Kye B., Han N., Kim E., Park, Y. & Jo, S. (2021). Educational applications of metaverse: Possibilities and limitations.Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18(32), 1-13.
[20] Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays.IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
[21] Miłkowski M., Clowes R., Rucińska Z., Przegalińska A., Zawidzki T., Krueger J., ... & Hohol M. (2018). From wide cognition to mechanisms: A silent revolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 2393.
[22] Moro C., Phelps C., Redmond P., & Stromberga Z. (2021). HoloLens and mobile augmented reality in medical and health science education: A randomised controlled trial.British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 680-694.
[23] Newen, A., Bruin, L.& Gallagher, S. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition, New York: Oxford University Press.
[24] Park S., Bokijonov S., & Choi Y. (2021). Review of Microsoft Hololens applications over the past five years.Applied Sciences, 11(16), 7259.
[25] Prychitko, E. (2021). The causal situationist account of constitutive relevance.Synthese, 198(2), 1829-1843.
[26] Rupert, R.D. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition.The Journal of Philosophy, 101(8), 389-428.
[27] Rupert, R. D. (2010). Extended cognition and the priority of cognitive systems.Cognitive Systems Research, 11(4), 343-356.
[28] Rokhsaritalemi, S., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. & Choi, S. M. (2020). A review on mixed reality: Current trends, challenges and prospects.Applied Sciences, 10(2), 636.
[29] Speicher M., Hall B. D., & Nebeling M. (2019). What is mixed reality? In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1-15.
[30] Smart, P. (2022). Minds in the metaverse: Extended cognition meets mixed reality.Philosophy & Technology, 35(4), 1-29.
[31] Smart, P. R. (2022). Toward a mechanistic account of extended cognition.Philosophical Psychology, 1-29.
[32] Uspenski, I., & Guga, J. (2022). Embodying metaverse as artificial life: At the intersection of media and 4E cognition theories.Philosophy and Society, 33(2), 326-345.
[33] van Eck, D., & de Jong, H. L. (2016). Mechanistic explanation, cognitive systems demarcation, and extended cognition.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 59, 11-21.
[34] Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636.
[35] Zhang G., Cao J., Liu D., & Qi J. (2022). Popularity of the metaverse: Embodied social presence theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.