变革型领导对员工工作幸福感的影响机制：工作重塑的中介作用与领导成员交换的调节作用

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.06.006

心理研究

2022, Vol. 15

Issue (6): 526-535 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.06.006

应用研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

变革型领导对员工工作幸福感的影响机制：工作重塑的中介作用与领导成员交换的调节作用

时勘^1,2, 宋旭东¹, 周瑞华¹, 郭慧丹³

1 温州大学教育学院温州模式发展研究院,温州 325035;
2 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院,北京 100190;
3 中国人民大学心理学系,北京 100875

The influence mechanism of transformational leadership on employees' job well-being： The mediating role of job crafting and the moderating role of leader-member exchange

SHI Kan^1,2, SONG Xudong¹, ZHOU Ruihua¹, GUO Huidan³

1 Educational School, Academy of Wenzhou Model Development, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035;
2 School of Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
3 Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (941 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本研究以工作要求-资源理论为基础,探索了变革型领导风格对员工工作幸福感的影响机制。用问卷调查法对企业事业的领导者及其直接下属进行调研,采用自评和他评相结合的方式,共获得104名领导者和886名直接下属的数据。研究结果表明,变革型领导对员工工作幸福感具有正向影响,而员工的工作重塑在变革型领导和工作幸福感之间起部分中介作用。领导成员交换（LMX）在变革型领导和工作重塑之间起到了正向调节作用。变革型领导通过工作重塑影响工作幸福感,而领导成员交换正向调节了这一中介路径。据此,领导者应根据具体情境表现出变革型领导行为,对员工的新想法提供积极的反馈,促进员工的工作重塑,进而提高工作幸福感。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	时勘
	宋旭东
	周瑞华
	郭慧丹

关键词 ：工作幸福感, 变革型领导, 工作重塑, 领导成员交换

基金资助:2021年浙江省哲学社会科学新兴（交叉）重大项目（21XXJC04ZD）、2019年国家社会科学基金后期资助重点项目（19FGLA002）

通讯作者: 时勘,男,教授,博士生导师。Email：shik@psych.ac.cn

引用本文:

时勘, 宋旭东, 周瑞华, 郭慧丹. 变革型领导对员工工作幸福感的影响机制：工作重塑的中介作用与领导成员交换的调节作用[J]. 心理研究, 2022, 15(6): 526-535.
SHI Kan, SONG Xudong, ZHOU Ruihua, GUO Huidan. The influence mechanism of transformational leadership on employees' job well-being： The mediating role of job crafting and the moderating role of leader-member exchange. Psychological Research, 2022, 15(6): 526-535.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.06.006 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V15/I6/526

[1] 陈晨, 时勘, 陆佳芳. (2015). 变革型领导与创新行为: 一个被调节的中介作用模型.管理科学, 28(04), 11-22.
[2] 后玉蓉, 吴群琪, 桂嘉伟. (2021). 工作重塑与员工幸福感的关系研究:基于自我决定理论的跨层次模型.现代管理科学, (03), 31-41.
[3] 黄亮. (2014). 中国企业员工工作幸福感的维度结构研究. 中央财经大学学报,(10), 84-92+112.
[4] 李超平, 时勘. (2005). 变革型领导的结构与测量.心理学报, 37(06), 803-811.
[5] 孟慧, 宋继文, 徐琳, 田京 & 钱静. (2013). 中国情境下变革型领导的内涵与测量的再探讨.管理学报, (03), 375-383.
[6] 彭怡, 陈红. (2010). 基于整合视角的幸福感内涵研析与重构.心理科学进展, 18(07), 1052-1061.
[7] 任孝鹏, 王辉. (2005). 领导-部属交换的回顾与展望.心理科学进展, 13(6), 788-797.
[8] 宋继文, 孙志强, 孟慧. (2009). 变革型领导的中介变量: 一个整合的视角.心理科学进展, 17(01), 147-157.
[9] 苏涛, 陈春花, 宋一晓, 王甜. (2018). 基于Meta检验和评估的员工幸福感前因与结果研究.管理学报,15 (04), 512-522.
[10] 孙健敏, 李秀凤, 林丛丛. (2016). 工作幸福感的概念演进与测量.中国人力资源开发, (13), 38-47.
[11] 王弘钰, 邹纯龙. (2019). 变革型领导对员工越轨创新的影响——一个有调节的中介模型.科技管理研究, 39(02), 165-171.
[12] 王辉, 张文慧, 谢红. (2009). 领导—部属交换对授权赋能领导行为影响.经济管理, 31(04), 99-104.
[13] 王荣. (2017). 伦理型领导与下属工作幸福感和组织公民行为.中国临床心理学杂志, 25(5), 939-942.
[14] 谢义忠, 吴萍. (2017). 变革型领导、社会交换关系对员工工作场景中主观幸福感的影响.软科学, 31(02), 61-65.
[15] 许龙, 高素英, 刘宏波, 杨鹏. (2017). 中国情境下员工幸福感的多层面模型.心理科学进展, 25(12), 2179-2191.
[16] 尹奎, 张凯丽, 李秀凤. (2019). 工作重塑对工作意义的影响: 团队任务绩效、领导-成员交换关系差异化的作用.管理评论, 31(03), 143-153.
[17] 张光磊, 胡婷, 陈丝璐. (2021). 人力资源实践的双重关注模型与员工绩效: 领导-成员交换的差异作用. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),(06), 89-104+206-207.
[18] 张征, 古银华. (2017). 包容型领导对下属工作幸福感的影响研究——互动公平与传统性的作用.软科学, 31(7), 84-88.
[19] 邹琼, 佐斌, 代涛涛. (2015). 工作幸福感: 概念, 测量水平与因果模型.心理科学进展, 23(4), 669-678.
[20] Arnold, K. A. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: A review and directions for future research.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 381.
[21] Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
[22] Bass, B. M. (1995). Theory of transformational leadership redux.The Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), 463-478.
[23] Cheng, J. C., & Yi, O. (2018). Hotel employee job crafting, burnout, and satisfaction: The moderating role of perceived organizational support.International Journal of Hospitality Management, 72,78-85.
[24] Chughtai A., Byrne M., & Flood B. (2015). Linking ethical leadership to employee well-being: The role of trust in supervisor.Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 653-663.
[25] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior.Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
[26] Demerouti E., Bakker A. B., Nachreiner F., & Schaufeli W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout.Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499.
[27] Fernet C., Trépanier S. G., Austin S., Gagné M., & Forest J. (2015). Transformational leadership and optimal functioning at work: On the mediating role of employees' perceived job characteristics and motivation.Work & Stress, 29(1), 11-31.
[28] Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis.Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335-337.
[29] Jyoti, J., & Bhau, S. (2016). Empirical investigation of moderating and mediating variables in between transformational leadership and related outcomes: A study of higher education sector in North India.International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 1123-1149.
[30] Khorakian, A., & Sharifirad, M. S. (2019). Integrating implicit leadership theories, leader-member exchange, self-efficacy, and attachment theory to predict job performance.Psychological Reports, 122(3), 1117-1144.
[31] Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2018). Can empowering leaders affect subordinates' well-being and careers because they encourage subordinates' job crafting behaviors?Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(2), 184-196.
[32] Lewig K. A., Xanthopoulou D., Bakker A. B., Dollard M. F., & Metzer J. C. (2007). Burnout and connectedness among Australian volunteers: A test of the Job Demands-Resources model.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 429-445.
[33] Martin R., Thomas G., Legood A., & Dello Russo S. (2018). Leader-member exchange (LMX) differentiation and work outcomes: Conceptual clarification and critical review.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 151-168.
[34] Rudolph C. W., Katz I. M., Lavigne K. N., & Zacher H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102,112-138.
[35] Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428.
[36] Schaufeli W. B., Bakker A. B., & Van Rhenen W. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism.Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(7), 893-917.
[37] Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The Job Crafting Questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting.International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(2), 126-146.
[38] SShunlong, X., & Weiming, Z. (2012). The relationships between transformational leadership, LMX, and employee innovative behavior.Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 13(5), 87-96.
[39] Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign.SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1-9.
[40] Waldman D. A., Ramirez G. G., House R. J., & Puranam P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty.Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 134-143.
[41] Wegge J., Shemla M., & Haslam S. A. (2014). Leader behavior as a determinant of health at work: Specification and evidence of five key pathways.German Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1-2), 6-23.
[42] Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work.Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201.
[43] Zhang, F., & Parker, S. K. (2019). Reorienting job crafting research: A hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 126-146.