智力思维模式量表在中国青少年中的心理计量学特性

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.04.012

心理研究

2022, Vol. 15

Issue (4): 376-384 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.04.012

学校心理研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

智力思维模式量表在中国青少年中的心理计量学特性

张阔, 杨宁, 顾家月

南开大学周恩来政府管理学院社会心理学系, 天津 300071

Psychometric characteristics of the mindsets of intelligence scale in Chinese adolescents

ZHANG Kuo, YANG Ning, GU Jiayue

Department of Social Psychology, Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (955 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要研究旨在评估智力思维模式量表在我国青少年群体中的心理计量学特性。采用智力思维模式量表中文版对浙江省4所初级中学的977名学生施测,结果分析显示：量表的内部一致性信度、重测信度以及量表条目的区分度良好;探索性和验证性因子分析均支持量表的两因子结构;不管是原量表还是3条目简版量表,采用第一人称时其效标效度均好于采用第二人称。上述结果表明,智力思维模式量表在中国青少年群体中的心理计量学特性良好,且第一人称量表的效标效度更优。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张阔
	杨宁
	顾家月

关键词 ：智力思维模式, 青少年, 心理计量学特性, 效标效度

基金资助:天津市哲学社会科学规划重点项目（TJJX19-007）

通讯作者: 张阔,男,1993~1997年在河南大学心理学科攻读学士学位,副教授,博士。Email：zhkuo@126.com

引用本文:

张阔, 杨宁, 顾家月. 智力思维模式量表在中国青少年中的心理计量学特性[J]. 心理研究, 2022, 15(4): 376-384.
ZHANG Kuo, YANG Ning, GU Jiayue. Psychometric characteristics of the mindsets of intelligence scale in Chinese adolescents. Psychological Research, 2022, 15(4): 376-384.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.04.012 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V15/I4/376

[1] 德韦克, C. S. (2021). 努力的意义:积极的自我理论 (王芳, 左世江译). 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
[2] 刁春婷, 周文倩, 黄臻. (2020). 小学生成长型思维模式与学业成绩、生活满意度的关系:学业自我效能感的中介作用.心理与行为研究, 18(4), 524-529.
[3] 苏傲雪, 万淑雅, 朱安琪. (2021). 父母思维模式、学生思维模式与学业成绩的关系研究:基于乌鲁木齐市两所小学的研究.民族教育研究, 32(1), 21-28.
[4] 田宏杰. (2019). 父母智力思维模式对青少年智力思维模式的影响:父母教养方式的中介作用.北京青年研究, 28(3), 13-19.
[5] 吴弦. (2021). 父母教育卷入对小学生学习成绩的影响:成长型思维的中介作用.当代教育论坛, (2), 75-88.
[6] 邢淑芬, 林崇德, 俞国良. (2011). 小学高年级儿童的内隐智力理论及其与表扬的关系.心理发展与教育, 27(3), 255-259.
[7] 张阔, 张赛, 董颖红. (2010). 积极心理资本:测量及其与心理健康的关系.心理与行为研究, 8(1), 58-64.
[8] Bettinger E., Ludvigsen S., Rege M., Solli I. F., & Yeager D. S. (2018). Increasing perseverance in math: Evidence from a field experiment in Norway. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 146, 1-15.
[9] Blackwell, L. S. (2002). Psychological mediators of student achievement during the transition to junior high school: The role of implicit theories(Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Columbia University.
[10] Blackwell L. S., Trzesniewski K. H., & Dweck C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention.Child Development, 78(1), 246-263.
[11] Burnette J. L., Russell M. V., Hoyt C. L., Orvidas K., & Widman L. (2018). An online growth mindset intervention in a sample of rural adolescent girls.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 428-445.
[12] Castella, K. D., & Byrne, D. (2015). My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: The revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(3), 245-267.
[13] Chen, C. (2015). Incremental validity of achievement goals in predicting subjective well-being among university students.Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 14(1), 38-62.
[14] Claro S., Paunesku D., & Dweck C. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(31), 8664-8668.
[15] Cook D. A., Gas B. L., & Artino A. R. (2018). Measuring mindsets and achievement goal motivation: A validation study of three instruments.Academic Medicine, 93(9), 1391-1399.
[16] Costa, A., & Faria, L. (2018). Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review.Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829.
[17] Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43-59.
[18] Dweck C. S.(2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
[19] Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
[20] Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets and human nature: Promoting change in the Middle East, the schoolyard, the racial divide, and willpower.American Psychologist, 67(8), 614-622.
[21] Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481-496.
[22] Dweck C. S., Chiu C. Y., & Hong Y. Y. (1995a). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives.Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267-285.
[23] Dweck C. S., Chiu C. Y., & Hong Y. Y. (1995b). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model.Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 322-333.
[24] Goldenberg A., Cohen-Chen S., Goyer J. P., Dweck C. S., Gross J. J., & Halperin E. (2018). Testing the impact and durability of a group malleability intervention in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(4), 696-701.
[25] Gunderson E. A., Donnellan M. B., Robins R. W., & Trzesniewski K. H. (2018). The specificity of parenting effects: Differential relations of parent praise and criticism to children’s theories of intelligence and learning goals.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 173, 116-135.
[26] Gunderson E. A., Gripshover S. J., Romero C., Dweck C. S., Goldin-Meadow S., & Levine S. C. (2013). Parent praise to 1- to 3-year-olds predicts children’s motivational frameworks 5 years later.Child Development, 84(5), 1526-1541.
[27] Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Assumptions of item response theory. Springer Netherlands.
[28] Hong Y., Chiu C., Dweck C. S., Lin D. M.-S., & Wan W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 588-599.
[29] Kärkkäinen R., Räty H., & Kasanen K. (2008). Children’s notions of the malleability of their academic competencies.Social Psychology of Education, 11(4), 445-458.
[30] Lee H. Y., Jamieson J. P., Miu A. S., Josephs R. A., & Yeager D. S. (2019). An entity theory of intelligence predicts higher cortisol levels when high school grades are declining.Child Development, 90(6), 849-867.
[31] Lüftenegger, M., & Chen, J. (2017). Conceptual issues and assessment of implicit theories.Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 225(2), 99-106.
[32] Sandra I. van A.-S., Juliette H. W. van der M., & Iro X.-D. (2019). Implicit STEM ability beliefs predict secondary school students’ STEM self-efficacy beliefs and their intention to opt for a STEM field career.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(4), 465-485.
[33] Tempelaar D. T., Rienties B., Giesbers B., & Gijselaers W. H. (2015). The pivotal role of effort beliefs in mediating implicit theories of intelligence and achievement goals and academic motivations.Social Psychology of Education, 18(1), 101-120.
[34] Wang D., Yuan F., & Wang Y. (2020). Growth mindset and academic achievement in Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation model of reasoning ability and self-affirmation.Current Psychology, (1), 1-7.
[35] Yeager D. S., Hanselman P., Walton G. M., Murray J. S., Crosnoe R., Muller C., Dweck C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement.Nature, 573(7774), 364-369.
[36] Yu, J., & McLellan, R. (2020). Same mindset, different goals and motivational frameworks: Profiles of mindset-based meaning systems.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101901.
[37] Zeng G., Hou H., & Peng K. (2016). Effect of growth mindset on school engagement and psychological well-being of Chinese primary and middle school students: The mediating role of resilience.Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1873.