工作场所的蜂王综合征

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.04.011

心理研究

2022, Vol. 15

Issue (4): 365-375 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.04.011

应用研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

工作场所的蜂王综合征

务凯, 丁桂凤

河南大学心理与行为研究所,开封 475001

Queen bee syndrome in the workplace：The conception, influential factors and future directions

WU Kai, DING Guifeng

Institute of Psychology & Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (1245 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要蜂王综合征是处于领导地位的女性对女下级更为严苛的一种行为,如何解决女性在职场中遇到的蜂王行为是职业健康心理学和领导心理学研究的一个新方向。在介绍蜂王综合征概念和特点的基础上,文章分析了权威主义、竞争和嫉妒、领导者性别角色、性别刻板印象、社会认同威胁及玻璃天花板6个因素对蜂王综合征产生的影响,并阐述了蜂王综合征对女性领导、女性下级、组织及性别平等的影响。未来研究需对蜂王综合征的测量、干预措施及女性破坏性领导等方面展开深入探讨。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	务凯
	丁桂凤

关键词 ：女性, 工作场所, 蜂王综合征

基金资助:国家社科基金（20BGL138）、河南省软科学项目（212400410162）、河南省教师教育课程改革研究项目（2021-JSJYYB-011）

通讯作者: 务凯,男,2000-2004年在河南大学心理学科攻读学士学位,2004-2007在河南大学攻读硕士学位,2007年至今在河南大学心理学科任教,副教授,博士在读。Email：wk@henu.edu.cn
丁桂凤,女,2003年至今在河南大学心理学科任教,教授,博士。Email：dgfhnu@163.com

引用本文:

务凯, 丁桂凤. 工作场所的蜂王综合征[J]. 心理研究, 2022, 15(4): 365-375.
WU Kai, DING Guifeng. Queen bee syndrome in the workplace：The conception, influential factors and future directions. Psychological Research, 2022, 15(4): 365-375.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.04.011 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V15/I4/365

[1] 刘苹, 郑沙沙, 吴继红. (2012). 上下级年龄和性别组合对员工绩效的影响分析.管理现代化, (5), 60-62.
[2] 马冬玲, 周旅军. (2018). 组织中的“蜂后”:事实还是想象?基于第三期中国妇女社会地位调查数据的实证研究.社会学评论, 6(05), 41-50.
[3] 吴维库, 刘军, 吴隆增. (2011). 辱虐管理:企业管理冷暴力.管理学家: 实践版, (2), 8-11.
[4] Aronson E., Wilson T. D., Akert R. M., & Sommers S. R. (2015). Social psychology (9th Edition). London: Pearson Education.
[5] Aman, G. İ., & Akman, Y. (2016). The opinions of female teachers about the female principals in the context of the queen bee syndrome.Bartin University Faculty of Education Journal, 5, 748-63.
[6] Arvate P. R., Galilea G. W., & Todescat I. (2018). The queen bee: A myth? The effect of top-level female leadership on subordinate females.Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 533-548.
[7] Byron, K. (2007). Male and female managers’ ability to 'read' emotions: Relationships with supervisor’s performance ratings and subordinates’ satisfaction ratings.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(4), 713-733.
[8] Brandt, M. J., & Henry, P. J. (2012). Gender inequality and gender differences in authoritarianism.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1301-1315.
[9] Cundiff, J. L., & Vescio, T. K. (2016). Gender stereotypes influence how people explain gender disparities in the workplace.Sex Roles, 75(3-4), 126-138.
[10] Cromwell, J. (1999). Transmen and FTMs: Identities, bodies, genders, and sexualities. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1 edition (October 13).
[11] Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2016). Women face a labyrinth: An examination of metaphors for women leaders.Gender in Management, 31(8), 514-527.
[12] Crothers L. M., Lipinski J., & Minutolo M. C. (2009). Cliques, rumors, and gossip by the water cooler: Female bullying in the workplace.The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12(2), 97-110.
[13] Chaluvadi, N. S. L. (2015). Differences in Leadership Styles between Genders: Outcomes and effectiveness of women in leadership roles.MBA Student Scholarship, 35.
[14] Derks B., Ellemers N., Van Laar C., & De Groot K. (2011a). Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee.British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 519-535.
[15] Derks B., Van Laar C., Ellemers N., & De Groot K. (2011b). Gender-bias primes elicit queen-bee responses among senior policewomen.Psychological Science, 22(10), 1243-1249.
[16] Derks B., Van Laar C., Ellemers N., & Raghoe G. (2015). Extending the queen bee effect: How hindustani workers cope with disadvantage by distancing the self from the group.Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 476-496.
[17] Derks B., Van Laar C., & Ellemers N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women.The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3),56-469.
[18] Dopwell, L. K. J. (2019). The Queen Bee Syndrome: Autoethnographic insights and educator observations: Perspectives from minority women (Doctoral dissertation, Northwest Nazarene University).
[19] Davidson M. J.,& Cooper, C. L., (1992). Shattering the glass ceiling: The woman manager. Paul Chapman Publishing.
[20] Duffy M. K., Scott K. L., Shaw J. D., Tepper B. J., & Aquino K. (2012). A social context model of envy and social undermining.Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 643-666.
[21] Drexler, P. (2013). The tyranny of the queen bee. The Wall Street Journal, 2-3.
[22] Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.Psychological Review, 109(3): 573.
[23] Eagly A. H., Eccleston C. P., & Major B. (2006). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: The role of group identification and appraisals.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(2), 147-162.
[24] Ellemers N., Spears R., & Doosje B. (2002). Self and social identity.Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 161-186.
[25] Ellemers, N., & Haslam, S. A. (2011). Social identity theory. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology, 379-398, London: Sage.
[26] Ellemers N., Rink F., Derks B., & Ryan M. K. (2012). Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this).Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 163-187.
[27] Einarsdottir U. D., Christiansen T. H., & Kristjansdottir E. S. (2018). “It’s a man who runs the show”: How women middle-managers experience their professional position, opportunities, and barriers.Sage Open, 8 (1), 2158244017753989.
[28] Faniko K., Ellemers N., & Derks B. (2016). Queen Bees and Alpha Males: Are successful women more competitive than successful men?European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(7), 903-913.
[29] Faniko K., Ellemers N., Derks B., & Lorenzi-Cioldi F. (2017). Nothing changes, really: Why women who break through the glass ceiling end up reinforcing it.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(5), 638-651.
[30] Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 81-92.
[31] Henry, P. J. (2011). The role of stigma in understanding ethnicity differences in authoritarianism.Political Psychology, 32, 419-438.
[32] Haslam S. A., Obrien A., Jetten J., Vormedal K., & Penna S. (2005). Taking the strain: Social identity, social support, and the experience of stress.British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(3), 355-370.
[33] Hall W. M., Schmader T., Aday A., & Croft E. (2019). Decoding the dynamics of social identity threat in the workplace: A within-person analysis of women’s and men’s interactions in STEM.Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 542-552.
[34] Jauhar, J., & Lau, V. (2018). The 'glass ceiling' and women's career advancement to top management: The moderating effect of social support.Global Business & Management Research An International Journal, 10.
[35] Johnson, Z., & Mathur-Helm, B. (2011). Experiences with queen bees: A South African study exploring the reluctance of women executives to promote other women in the workplace.South African Journal of Business Management, 42(4), 47-55.
[36] Koch A. J., Dmello S. D., & Sackett P. R. (2015). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 128-161.
[37] Kaiser, C. R., & Spalding, K. E. (2015). Do women who succeed in male dominated domains help other women? The moderating role of gender identification.European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(5), 599-608.
[38] Kremer H., Villamor I., & Ormiston M. (2019). Princess Bee Effect: The reverse queen bee phenomenon. In Academy of Management Proceedings(Vol. 2019, No. 1, p. 19515). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
[39] Kinnear, L., & Ortlepp, K. (2016). Emerging models of power among South African women business leaders.SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 42(1), 1-11.
[40] Lutgen-Sandvik P., Dickinson E. A., & Foss K. A. (2012). Priming, painting, peeling, and polishing: Constructing and deconstructing the woman-bullying-woman identity at work.Gender and the Dysfunctional Workplace, 61, 1-15.
[41] Lockwood, P. (2006). “Someone like me can be successful”: Do college students need same-gender role models?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 36-46.
[42] Miller, A. R. (2017). Women and leadership. In S. L. Averett, L. M. Argys, & S. D. Hoffffman (Eds.). Oxford handbook on women and the economy. New York: Oxford University.
[43] Maume, D. J. (2011). Meet the new boss, same as the old boss? Female supervisors and subordinate career prospects.Social Science Research, 40(1), 287-298.
[44] Mavin, S. (2008). Queen bees, wannabees and afraid to bees: No more “best enemies” for women in management?British Journal of Management, 19(s1), S75-S84.
[45] Neal-Barnett A., Stadulis R., Singer N., Murray M., & Demmings J. (2010). Assessing the effects of experiencing the acting White accusation.The Urban Review, 42(2), 102-122.
[46] Ng, C. W., & Chiu, W. C. (2001). Managing equal opportunities for women: Sorting the friends from the foes.Human Resource Management Journal, 11(1), 75-88.
[47] Outten H., Schmitt M., Garcia D., & Branscombe N. (2009). Coping options: Missing links between minority group identification and psychological well-being.Applied Psychology, 58(1), 146-170.
[48] Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis.Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546-1571.
[49] Peterson, B. E., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2010). Gender, sexuality, and the authoritarian personality.Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1801-1826.
[50] Sobczak, A. (2018). The Queen Bee Syndrome. The paradox of women discrimination on the labour market.Journal of Gender and Power, 9(1), 51-61.
[51] Staines G., Tavris C., & Jayaratne T. E. (1974). The queen bee syndrome.Psychology Today, 7(8), 55-60.
[52] Sengul H., Cinar F., & Bulut A. (2019). The perception of queen bee phenomenon in nurses: Qualitative study in health sector.Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 22(7), 906-912.
[53] Scully J. A., Sims Jr H. P., Olian J. D., Schnell E. R., & Smith K. A. (1994). Tough times make tough bosses: A meso analysis of CEO leader behavior.The Leadership Quarterly, 5(1), 59-83.
[54] Stroebe K., Ellemers N., Barreto M., & Mummendey A. (2009). For better or for worse: The congruence of personal and group outcomes on targets’ responses to discrimination.European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 576-591.
[55] Starr, K. (2001). What makes management experience different for women? Secrets revealed through the structure of cathexis. In Rethinking Gender, Work and Organization Conference, June, Keele.
[56] Sheppard, L. D., & Aquino, K. (2013). Much ado about nothing? Observers’ problematization of women's same-sex conflict at work.Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(1), 52-62.
[57] Schmitt M. T., Branscombe N. R., Kobrynowicz D., & Owen S. (2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 197-210.
[58] Sutton R. M., Elder T. J., & Douglas K. M. (2006). Reactions to internal and external criticism of outgroups: Social convention in the intergroup sensitivity effect.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 563-575.
[59] Schaumberg, R. L., & Flynn, F. (2016). Self-reliance: A gender perspective on its relationship to communality and leadership evaluations.Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1859-1881.
[60] Schieman, S., & Mcmullen, T. (2008). Relational demography in the workplace and health: An analysis of gender and the subordinate-superordinate role-set.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49(3), 286-300.
[61] Tepper B. J., Simon L., & Park H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision.Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 123-152.
[62] Toren, N., Konrad, A. M., Yoshioka, I., & Kashlak, R. (1997). A cross-national cross-gender study of managerial task preferences and evaluation of work characteristics.Women in Management Review, 12(6), 234-243.
[63] Veldman J., Van Laar C., Meeussen L., & Lo Bue S. (2020). Daily coping with social identity threat in outgroup-dominated contexts: Self-group distancing among female soldiers.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
[64] Van Lieshout, C. (2019). The Queen Bee in New Zealand: The role of group commitment in group-distancing behaviour (Unpublished master’s thesis ). The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
[65] Wright S. C.(2001). Restricted intergroup boundaries: Tokenism, ambiguity, and the tolerance of injustice. In Jost J T& Major B.(Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy:Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations, (pp. 223-254). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[66] Wiegand, Tessa. (2015). Helping hand or queen bee? The impact of senior-level women on junior-level women within organizations (Unpublished master’s thesis ).,Harvard College,Massachusetts.
[67] Zuraik A., Kelly L., & Perkins V. (2020). Gender differences in innovation: The role of ambidextrous leadership of the team leads.Management Decision.
[68] Zurriaga R., González-Navarro P., Buunk A. P., & Dijkstra P. (2018). Jealousy at work: The role of rivals’ characteristics.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(4), 443-450.