转换与坚持：低阶层者有效应对健康困境的心理策略

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.04.003

心理研究

2022, Vol. 15

Issue (4): 304-310 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.04.003

理论论坛

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

转换与坚持：低阶层者有效应对健康困境的心理策略

饶婷婷¹, 喻丰², 李凯², 张君君³

1.西安交通大学人文社会科学学院社会心理学研究所, 西安 710049;
2.武汉大学哲学学院心理学系, 武汉 430072;
3.西安交通大学马克思主义学院, 西安 710049

Persist and shift： The effective psychological strategies for the lower class to cope with socioeconomic disparities in health

RAO Tingting¹, YU Feng², LI Kai², ZHANG Junjun³

1. Institute of Social Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049;
2. Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
3. School of Marxism Studies, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (2)

全文: PDF (960 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要相对高阶层而言,低阶层群体的身心健康总体呈现较低水平。转换—坚持策略作为压力应对方式,有助于改善低阶层个体的健康状况。转换指的是个体在困境中接纳现实并进行认知重评以调适自我、适应环境;而坚持是指在逆境中不断寻找生活意义、维持乐观、心怀力量并保持稳定自我的应对方式。研究表明转换和坚持既可以分别独立正向预测低阶层者的健康水平,又可以作为一种整合策略对低阶层者的健康起到促进作用。未来应深入开展转换—坚持策略的实证研究,提高其研究的生态效度并开展应用实践。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	饶婷婷
	喻丰
	李凯
	张君君

关键词 ：转换, 坚持, 社会阶层, 健康

基金资助:国家社科基金项目（20CZX059）,教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（18YJC190029）, 中国博士后科学基金面上项目（2017M623138）

通讯作者: 喻丰,男,2003~2007年在河南大学心理学科攻读学士学位,教授,博士生导师。Email:psychpedia@whu.edu.cn

引用本文:

饶婷婷, 喻丰, 李凯, 张君君. 转换与坚持：低阶层者有效应对健康困境的心理策略[J]. 心理研究, 2022, 15(4): 304-310.
RAO Tingting, YU Feng, LI Kai, ZHANG Junjun. Persist and shift： The effective psychological strategies for the lower class to cope with socioeconomic disparities in health. Psychological Research, 2022, 15(4): 304-310.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.04.003 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V15/I4/304

[1] 安献丽, 陈四光. (2016). 认知重评阻断条件化恐惧记忆的习得与表达:对恐惧反应的长程抑制作用.心理学报, 48(10), 1239-1247.
[2] 程利, 袁加锦, 何媛媛, 李红. (2009). 情绪调节策略: 认知重评优于表达抑制.心理科学进展, 17(4), 730-735.
[3] 邓子谦, 陈晓晨, 韦庆旺. (2020). 从社会文化的视角看健康与教育的阶层差异.心理科学进展, 28(12), 2125-2136.
[4] 郭永玉, 杨沈龙, 胡小勇. (2017). 理想天平与现实阶梯: 心理学视角下的社会分层与公平研究.中国科学院院刊, 32(2), 117-127.
[5] 洪岩璧, 华杰. (2020). 健康行为代际传递模式的社会经济地位差异:基于CHNS2015的实证研究.华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 34(6), 39-48.
[6] 胡小勇, 徐步霄, 杨沈龙, 郭永玉. (2019). 心理贫困: 概念、表现及其干预.心理科学, 42(5), 1224-1229.
[7] 胡小勇, 杨沈龙, 钟琪, 喻丰, 陈红. (2019). 社会阶层与健康的关系: “社会-心理-生理”机制.科学通报, 64(2), 81-92.
[8] 李小新, 任志洪, 胡小勇, 郭永玉. (2019). 低家庭社会阶层大学生为何更容易社交焦虑?心理社会资源和拒绝敏感性的多重中介作用.心理科学, (6), 1354-1360.
[9] 李占宏, 赵梦娇, 刘慧瀛, 刘亚楠, 彭凯平. (2018). 生命意义寻求的原因:成长抑或危机.心理科学进展, 26(12), 106-117.
[10] 罗雪峰, 沐守宽. (2017). 高中生感恩对心理幸福感的影响: 领悟社会支持和基本心理需要的链式中介作用.心理科学, 2017, (4), 112-118.
[11] 尤瑾, 安蕾, 沈海坤, 朱颖, 李彩娜. (2018). 从毕生发展的视角看健康的贫富差距.心理科学进展, 26(9), 1700-1710.
[12] 尤瑾, 杨蕾, 商士杰, 余诗景. (2016). 健康的贫富差距及其内在机制.心理科学进展, 24(7), 1118-1129.
[13] 张晶, 李明霞, 张曼, 陈鑫鑫, 王咏尔. (2020). 中学生心理弹性与新冠疫情下的师生关系: 认知重评策略的中介作用.中国特殊教育, (6), 82-88.
[14] 张阔, 王春梅, 王敬欣. (2016). 抑郁症患者认知重评和分心情绪调节的有效性: ERPs研究.心理学探新, 36(3), 245-250.
[15] 朱慧劼, 风笑天. (2018). “健康中国”背景下的健康不平等.学习与实践, (4), 91-98.
[16] And, S. F., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise.Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 745-774.
[17] Anda R. F., Dong M., Brown D. W., Felitti V. J., Giles W. H., Perry G. S., .. & Dube, S. R. (2009). The relationship of adverse childhood experiences to a history of premature death of family members.BMC Public Health, 9(1), 1-10.
[18] Boyle P. A., Barnes L. L., Buchman A. S., & Bennett D. A. (2009). Purpose in life is associated with mortality among community-dwelling older persons.Psychosomatic Medicine, 71(5), 574-579.
[19] Chaves, C., & Park, C. L. (2015). Differential pathways of positive and negative health behavior change in congestive heart failure patients.Journal of Health Psychology, 21(8), 1728-1738.
[20] Chen, E., & Miller, G. E. (2012). “Shift-and-persist” strategies: Why being low in socioeconomic status isn't always bad for health.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 135-158.
[21] Chen, E., & Miller, G. E. (2013). Socioeconomic status and health: Mediating and moderating factors.Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(9), 723-749.
[22] Chen E., Matthews K. A., & Zhou F. (2007). Interpretations of ambiguous social situations and cardiovascular responses in adolescents.Annals of Behavioral Medicine A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 34(1): 26-36.
[23] Chen E., Mclean K. C., & Miller G. E. (2015). Shift-and-persist strategies: Associations with socioeconomic status and the regulation of inflammation among adolescents and their parents.Psychosomatic Medicine, 77(4), 371-382.
[24] Chen E., Miller G. E., Kobor M. S., & Cole S. W. (2011). Maternal warmth buffers the effects of low early-life socioeconomic status on pro-inflammatory signaling in adulthood.Molecular Psychiatry, 16(7), 729-737.
[25] Grewen K., Girdler S. S., West S. G., Bragdon E., Costello N., & Light K. C. (2000). Stable pessimistic attributions interact with socioeconomic status to influence blood pressure and vulnerability to hypertension.Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-based Medicine, 9(8), 905-915.
[26] Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(1), 224-237.
[27] Kim, H. B., & Kim, J. E. (2012). Protective factors for adults from low-childhood socioeconomic circumstances: The benefits of shift-and-persist for allostatic load.Psychosomatic Medicine, 74(2), 178-186.
[28] Kramer M. R., Schneider E. B., Kane J. B., Margerison-Zilko C., Jones-Smith J., King K.,…& Grzywacz J. G. (2017). Getting under the skin: children’s health disparities as embodiment of social class. Population Research and Policy Review, 36(10), 671-697.
[29] Lago S., Cantarero D., Rivera B., Pascual M., Blázquez-Fernández C., Casal B., & Reyes F. (2018). Socioeconomic status, health inequalities and non-communicable diseases: A systematic review.Journal of Public Health, 26, 1-14.
[30] Landau M. J., Kay A. C., & Whitson J. A. (2015). Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world.Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 694-722.
[31] Luthar, S. S.(2006). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In D. Cicchetti & D.J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology, Vol. 3: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 739-795). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
[32] Manstead, A. S.(2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour.British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 267-291.
[33] Mao J., Yang S., & Guo Y.(2020). Are individuals from lower social class more susceptible to conspiracy theories? An explanation from the compensatory control theory. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 372-383.
[34] McEwen, C. A., & McEwen, B. S.(2017). Social structure, adversity, toxic stress, and intergenerational poverty: An early childhood model.Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 445-472.
[35] Miller, G. E., & Wrosch, C. (2007). You’ve gotta know when to fold’em: Goal disengagement and systemic inflammation in adolescence.Psychological Science, 18(9), 773-777.
[36] Milligan K., Irwin A., Wolfe-Miscio M., Hamilton L., Mintz L., Cox M., .. & Phillips M. (2016). Mindfulness enhances use of secondary control strategies in high school students at risk for mental health challenges.Mindfulness, 7(1), 219-227.
[37] Morling, B., & Evered, S. (2006). Secondary control reviewed and defined.Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 269-296.
[38] Morozink J. A., Friedman E. M., Coe C. L., & Ryff C. D. (2010). Socioeconomic and psychosocial predictors of interleukin-6 in the MIDUS national sample.Health Psychology, 29(6), 626-635.
[39] Motley R., Sewell W., & Chen Y. C. (2017). Community violence exposure and risk taking behaviors among black emerging adults: A systematic review.Journal of Community Health, 42, 1069-1078.
[40] Roy B., Diez-Roux A. V., Seeman T., Ranjit N., Shea S., & Cushman M. (2010). The association of optimism and pessimism with inflammation and hemostasis in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).Psychosomatic Medicine, 72(2), 134-140.
[41] Rubin, M., & Stuart, R. (2017). Kill or cure? Different types of social class identification amplify and buffer the relation between social class and mental health.Journal of Social Psychology, 158(2), 236-251.
[42] Sepúlveda, J., & Murray, C. (2014). The state of global health in 2014.Science, 345(6202), 1275-1278.
[43] Simandan, D. (2018). Rethinking the health consequences of social class and social mobility.Social Science and Medicine, 200, 258-261.
[44] Stephens N. M., Markus H. R., & Phillips L. T. (2014). Social class culture cycles: How three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality.Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 611-634.
[45] Tan J. J. X., Kraus M. W., Carpenter N. C., & Adler N. E. (2020). The association between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic review.Psychological Bulletin, 146(11), 970-1020.
[46] Troy A. S., Ford B. Q., McRae K., Zarolia P., & Mauss I. B. (2017). Change the things you can: Emotion regulation is more beneficial for people from lower than from higher socioeconomic status.Emotion, 17(1), 141-154.
[47] Updegraff J. A., Silver R. C., & Holman E. A. (2008). Searching for and finding meaning in collective trauma: Results from a national longitudinal study of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 709-722.
[48] Wright L. B., Treiber F. A., Davis H., & Strong W. B. (1996). Relationship of John Henryism to cardiovascular functioning at rest and during stress in youth.Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 18(3), 146-150.