简单乘法心算中的邻近一致性：来自ERP证据

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2026.03.004

心理研究

2026, Vol. 19

Issue (3): 229-237 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2026.03.004

基础研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

简单乘法心算中的邻近一致性：来自ERP证据

申吉¹, 陈丽娟², 贾良智², 潘运²

1 毕节医学高等专科学校, 毕节 551700;
2 贵州师范大学心理学院,贵阳 550025

Neighborhood consistency in simple multiplication mental arithmetic：Evidence from ERP study

SHEN Ji¹, CHEN Lijuan², JIA Liangzhi², PAN Yun²

1 Bijie Medical College, Bijie 551700;
2 School of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (1013 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要简单乘法心算的错误主要表现在答案是否与操作数相关（邻近性）或与正确结果是否共享相同的十位数（一致性）两种情况。研究选取在校大学生32名,采用延迟验证范式,使用事件相关电位（ERPs）技术,在听通道呈现算术答案实验中考察邻近性与一致性对简单乘法心算的影响。结果发现：邻近性与一致性交互作用显著,邻近一致答案的反应时和诱发的N400与晚期正成分（LPC）均显著大于邻近不一致答案。研究表明与乘数相关且与正确结果共享相同十位数的错误答案对乘法心算判断具有促进作用,支持了交互邻近模型。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	申吉
	陈丽娟
	贾良智
	潘运

关键词 ：数字认知, 乘法心算, 邻近一致性

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目（1190410518075）

通讯作者: 潘运,男,教授,博士生导师。Email：panyun129@163.com

引用本文:

申吉, 陈丽娟, 贾良智, 潘运. 简单乘法心算中的邻近一致性：来自ERP证据[J]. 心理研究, 2026, 19(3): 229-237.
SHEN Ji, CHEN Lijuan, JIA Liangzhi, PAN Yun. Neighborhood consistency in simple multiplication mental arithmetic：Evidence from ERP study. Psychological Research, 2026, 19(3): 229-237.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2026.03.004 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2026/V19/I3/229

[1] Ashcraft, M. H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory.Cognition, 44(1-2), 75-106.
[2] Ashcraft, M. H., & Stazyk, E. H. (1981). Menatal addition: A test of three verification models.Memory & Cognition, 9(2), 185-196.
[3] Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 333-339.
[4] Bourne, P. P. L. E., & Birbaumer, N. (1998). Extensive practice in mental arithmetic and practice transfer over a ten-month retention interval.Mathematical Cognition, 4(1), 21-46.
[5] Campbell, J. I. D. (1987). Network interference and mental multiplication.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(1), 109-123.
[6] Campbell, J. I. D. (1997). On the relation between skilled performance of simple division and multiplication.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1140-1159.
[7] Campbell, J. I. D., & Metcalfe, A. W. S. (2007). Arithmetic rules and numeral format.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 335-355.
[8] Campbell, J. I. D., & Thompson, V. A. (2012). Retrieval-induced forgetting of arithmetic facts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 118-129.
[9] Campbell J. I. D., Dowd R. R., Frick J. M., McCallum K. N., & Metcalfe, A. W. S. (2011). Neighborhood consistency and memory for number facts.Memory & Cognition, 39(5), 884-893.
[10] Cárdenas S. Y., Silva-Pereyra J., Prieto-Corona B., Castro-Chavira S. A., & Fernández T. (2021). Arithmetic processing in children with dyscalculia: An event-related potential study.PeerJ, 9, e10489.
[11] Chen, E. H., & Bailey, D. H. (2021). Dual-task studies of working memory and arithmetic performance: A meta-analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(2), 220-222.
[12] Chiera A., Adornetti I., Altavilla D., Acciai A., Cosentino E., Deriu V., McCarroll C., Nicchiarelli S., Preziotti V., & Ferretti F. (2022). Does the character-based dimension of stories impact narrative processing? An event-related potentials (ERPs) study.Cognitive Processing, 23(2), 255-267.
[13] Dickson, D. S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2017). The language of arithmetic across the hemispheres: An event-related potential investigation. Brain Research, 1662, 46-56.
[14] Dickson D. S., Cerda V. R., Beavers R. N., Ruiz A., Castañeda R., & Wicha N. Y. (2018). When 2×4 is meaningful: The N400 and P300 reveal operand format effects in multiplication verification.Psychophysiology, 55(11), e13212.
[15] Domahs, F., & Delazer, M. (2005). Some assumptions and facts about arithmetic facts.Psychology Science, 47(1), 96-111.
[16] Domahs F., Delazer M., & Nuerk H. (2006). What makes multiplication facts difficult.Experimental Psychology, 53(4), 275-282.
[17] Domahs F., Domahs U., Schlesewsky M., Ratinckx E., Verguts T., Willmes K., & Nuerk H. C. (2007). Neighborhood consistency in mental arithmetic: Behavioral and ERP evidence.Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3(1), 1-13.
[18] Duncan-Johnson, C., & Kopell, B. (1981). The stroop effect: Brain potentials localize the source of interference.Science, 214, 938-940.
[19] Faul F., Erdfelder E., Buchner A., & Lang A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses.Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
[20] Finke S., Kemény F., Clayton F. J., Banfi C., Steiner A. F., Perchtold-Stefan C. M., Papousek I., Göbel S. M., & Landerl K. (2021). Cross-format integration of auditory number words and visual-arabic digits: An ERP study.Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 765709.
[21] Gallo D. A., McDermott K. B., Percer J. M., & Roediger H. L. (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(2), 339-353.
[22] Guthormsen A. M., Fisher K. J., Bassok M., Osterhout L., DeWolf M., & Holyoak K. J. (2016). Conceptual integration of arithmetic operations with real-world knowledge: Evidence from event-related potentials.Cognitive Science, 40(3), 723-757.
[23] Heidekum A. E., Grabner R. H., De Smedt B., De Visscher A., & Vogel S. E. (2019). Interference during the retrieval of arithmetic and lexico-semantic knowledge modulates similar brain regions: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).Cortex, 120, 375-393.
[24] Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing.Psychophysiology, 30(1), 47-61.
[25] Imbo I., Vandierendonck A., & De Rammelaere S. (2007). The role of working memory in the carry operation of mental arithmetic: Number and value of the carry.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(5), 708-731.
[26] Jasinski, E. C., & Coch, D. (2012). ERPs across arithmetic operations in a delayed answer verification task.Psychophysiology, 49(7), 943-958.
[27] Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.Science, 207(4427), 203-205.
[28] Lemaire, P., & Fayol, M. (1995). When plausibility judgments supersede fact retrieval: The example of the odd-even effect on product verification.Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 34-48.
[29] Liu R., Schunn C. D., Fiez J. A., & Libertus M. E. (2018). The integration between nonsymbolic and symbolic numbers: Evidence from an EEG study.Brain and Behavior, 8(4), e00938.
[30] McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1981). A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time.Science, 211(4477), 77-80.
[31] Morris C. D., Bransford J. D., & Franks J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(5), 519-533.
[32] Muller, Keith (1989). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Technometrics, 31(4), 499-500.
[33] Muluh E. T., Vaughan C. L., & John L. R. (2011). High resolution event-related potentials analysis of the arithmetic-operation effect in mental arithmetic.Clinical Neurophysiology, 122(3), 518-529.
[34] Niedeggen, M., & Rösler, F. (1999). N400 effects reflect activation spread during retrieval of arithmetic facts.Psychological Science, 10(3), 271-276.
[35] Pierce B. H., Gallo D. A., Weiss J. A., & Schacter D. L. (2005). The modality effect in false recognition: Evidence for test-based monitoring.Memory & Cognition, 33(8), 1407-1413.
[36] Polich, J. (2012). Neuropsychology of P300. In S. J. Luck, & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.). Oxford handbook of event-related potential components(pp. 159-188). Oxford University Press.
[37] Rezaei, M. (2019). Neuropsychological decomposing stroop interference into different cognitive monitoring: An exploratory factor analysis.Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 10(5), 475-483.
[38] Rhodes, S. M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence for the effect of interactive imagery on episodic memory: Encouraging familiarity for non-unitized stimuli during associative recognition.NeuroImage, 39(2), 873-884.
[39] Roediger, III, H. L., & Guynn, M. J. (1996). Retrieval processes. Memory, 197-236.
[40] Rotem, A., & Henik, A. (2015). Sensitivity to general and specific numerical features in typical achievers and children with mathematics learning disability.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(11), 2291-2303.
[41] Salillas, E., & Wicha, N. Y. (2012). Early learning shapes the memory networks for arithmetic: Evidence from brain potentials in bilinguals.Psychological Science, 23(7), 745-755.
[42] Swaab T. Y., Ledoux K., Camblin C. C., & Boudewyn, M. A. (2012). Language-related ERP components. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components(pp. 397-439). Oxford University Press.
[43] Tanner D., Morgan-Short K., & Luck S. J. (2015). How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition.Psychophysiology, 52(8), 997-1009.
[44] Tavakoli P., Jerome E., Boafo A., & Campbell K. (2021). Attentional bias deficits in adolescent suicide attempters during an emotional stroop task: An ERP study.Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 694147.
[45] Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review, 80(5), 352-373.
[46] Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2005a). Interacting neighbors: A connectionist model of retrieval in single-digit multiplication.Memory & Cognition, 33(1), 1-16.
[47] Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2005b). Neighbourhood effects in mental arithmetic.Psychology Science, 47(1), 132-140.
[48] Zhou, X., & Dong, Q. (2003). Representation formats for addition and multiplication facts.Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35(3), 345-351.
[49] Zhou X., Chen C., Zhang H., Chen C., Zhou R., & Dong Q. (2007). The operand-order effect in single-digit multiplication: An ERP study of Chinese adults.Neuroscience Letters, 414(1), 41-44.
[50] Zhu B., Chen C., Shao X., Liu W., Ye Z., Zhuang L., .. & Xue G. (2019). Multiple interactive memory representations underlie the induction of false memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(9), 3466-3475.