惩罚概率对不诚实行为的影响：注视眼效应的检验

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2026.04.002

心理研究

2026, Vol. 19

Issue (4): 299-308 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2026.04.002

基础研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

惩罚概率对不诚实行为的影响：注视眼效应的检验

赤宏娟, 武婷婷, 郝芳, 刘长江

南京师范大学心理学院, 南京 210097

The impact of punishment probability on dishonesty：An examination of the watching eyes effect

CHI Hongjuan, WU Tingting, HAO Fang, LIU Changjiang

School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (1)

全文: PDF (1056 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要通过两个实验检验惩罚概率与注视眼对个体在骰子投掷任务中不诚实行为的交互影响。两个实验均发现,更高的惩罚概率抑制了不诚实行为,尤其是较大程度的不诚实行为。此外,实验1发现,在中等惩罚概率条件下,注视眼显著地降低较小程度的不诚实行为;实验2发现,在低惩罚概率条件下,注视眼显著地降低较大程度的不诚实行为。这说明,在人们意识到有机会逃过惩罚时,基于注视眼图案的干预措施可以抑制其不诚实行为。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	赤宏娟
	武婷婷
	郝芳
	刘长江

关键词 ：不诚实, 惩罚概率, 注视眼效应, 威慑理论, 助推

基金资助:教育部人文社会科学规划项目（20YJA190005）、国家社会科学基金项目（21BSH157）

通讯作者: 刘长江,男,教授,博士生导师。Email：chjliu@njnu.edu.cn

引用本文:

赤宏娟, 武婷婷, 郝芳, 刘长江. 惩罚概率对不诚实行为的影响：注视眼效应的检验[J]. 心理研究, 2026, 19(4): 299-308.
CHI Hongjuan, WU Tingting, HAO Fang, LIU Changjiang. The impact of punishment probability on dishonesty：An examination of the watching eyes effect. Psychological Research, 2026, 19(4): 299-308.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2026.04.002 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2026/V19/I4/299

[1] 陈思静, 邢懿琳, 翁异静, 黎常. (2021). 第三方惩罚对合作的溢出效应: 基于社会规范的解释.心理学报, 53(7), 758-772.
[2] 范伟, 任梦梦, 肖俊泽, 简增郸, 杜晓明, 傅小兰. (2019). 羞耻情绪对欺骗行为的影响: 自我控制的作用.心理学报, 51(9), 992-1006.
[3] 时慧颖, 汤洁, 刘萍萍. (2022). 眼睛效应不稳定与感知规范: 一个新视角.心理科学进展, 30(12), 2718-2734.
[4] 吴琴, 崔丽莹. (2020). 合作行为中的“眼睛效应”: 解释机制与限制因素.心理科学进展, 28(6), 994-1003.
[5] 王修欣, 刘永芳. (2024). 社会决策中道德自我与自利偏好的权衡: 基于自我概念维护理论和道德阈限模型.心理研究, 17(1), 54-60.
[6] 张雪姣, 刘聪慧. (2017). 亲社会行为中的“眼睛效应”.心理科学进展, 25(3), 475-485.
[7] Ayal S., Celse J., & Hochman G. (2021). Crafting messages to fight dishonesty: A field investigation of the effects of social norms and watching eye cues on fare evasion.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 166, 9-19.
[8] Bahník, S., & Vranka, M. A. (2022). Experimental test of the effects of punishment probability and size on the decision to take a bribe.Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 97, 101813.
[9] Bateson M., Callow L., Holmes J. R., Redmond Roche M. L., & Nettle D. (2013). Do images of ‘watching eyes’ induce behaviour that is more pro-social or more normative? A field experiment on littering.PloS One, 8(12), e82055.
[10] Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach.Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217.
[11] Behnk S., Barreda-Tarrazona I., & Garcia-Gallego A. (2018). Punishing liars-How monitoring affects honesty and trust.PloS One, 13(10), e0205420.
[12] Békir I., Harbi S. E., Grolleau G., Mzoughi N., & Sutan A. (2016). The impact of monitoring and sanctions on cheating: Experimental evidence from Tunisia.Managerial and Decision Economics, 37(7), 461-473.
[13] Cai W., Huang X., Wu S., & Kou Y. (2015). Dishonest behavior is not affected by an image of watching eyes.Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(2), 110-116.
[14] DeAngelo, G., & Charness, G. (2012). Deterrence, expected cost, uncertainty and voting: Experimental evidence.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 44(1), 73-100.
[15] Dear K., Dutton K., & Fox E. (2019). Do ‘watching eyes’ influence antisocial behavior? A systematic review & meta-analysis.Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(3), 269-280.
[16] DePaulo B. M., Lindsay J. J., Malone B. E., Muhlenbruck L., Charlton K., & Cooper H. (2003). Cues to deception.Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74-118.
[17] Faul F., Erdfelder E., Buchner A., & Lang A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses.Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
[18] Fenzl, T., & Brudermann, T. (2021). Eye cues increase cooperation in the dictator game under physical attendance of a recipient, but not for all.Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 94, 101748.
[19] Fischbacher, U., & F?llmi-Heusi, F. (2013). Lies in disguise-an experimental study on cheating.Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 525-547.
[20] Freeman J., Parkes A., Mills L., Truelove V., & Davey J. (2021). A study identifying the origins of different types of drink driving events through the lens of deterrence: Is it alcohol abuse or avoiding detection? Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 79, 157-169.
[21] Gamliel, E., & Peer, E. (2013). Explicit risk of getting caught does not affect unethical behavior.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(6), 1281-1288.
[22] Geraldes D., Heinicke F., & Kim D. G. (2021). Big and small lies.Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 91, 101666.
[23] Gerlach P., Teodorescu K., & Hertwig R. (2019). The truth about lies: A meta-analysis on dishonest behavior.Psychological Bulletin, 145(1), 1-44.
[24] Gino F., Ayal S., & Ariely D. (2013). Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 285-292.
[25] Grolleau G., Kocher M. G., & Sutan A. (2016). Cheating and loss aversion: Do people cheat more to avoid a loss? Management Science, 62(12), 3428-3438.
[26] Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game.Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(3), 245-256.
[27] Hietanen J. O., Syrjamaki A. H., Zilliacus P. K., & Hietanen J. K. (2018). Eye contact reduces lying.Consciousness and Cognition, 66, 65-73.
[28] Hsieh M. L., Wang K. S. Y., & Lin Y. (2023). Perceptions of punishment risks among youth: Can cyberbullying be deterred? Journal of School Violence, 22(3), 307-321.
[29] Jiang L. L., Chen Z., Perc M., Wang Z., Kurths J., & Moreno Y. (2023). Deterrence through punishment can resolve collective risk dilemmas in carbon emission games.Chaos, 33(4), 043127.
[30] Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2017). Duplicity among the dark triad: Three faces of deceit.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 329-342.
[31] Mahasuweerachai, P., & SrungBoonmee, T. (2021). The relative effectiveness of punishment severity and risk of apprehension in deterring dishonest behavior: Experimental results from a developing country.Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 42(2), 245-248.
[32] Mazar N., Amir O., & Ariely D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance.Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633-644.
[33] McKenzie J., Crosby P., Cox J., & Collins A. (2019). Experimental evidence on demand for ‘on-demand’ entertainment.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 161, 98-113.
[34] Mol J. M., van der Heijden, E. C. M., & Potters, J. J. M. (2020). (Not) alone in the world: Cheating in the presence of a virtual observer.Experimental Economics, 23(4), 961-978.
[35] Northover S. B., Pedersen W. C., Cohen A. B., & Andrews P. W. (2017). Artificial surveillance cues do not increase generosity: Two meta-analyses.Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(1), 144-153.
[36] Oda R., Kato Y., & Hiraishi K. (2015). The watching-eye effect on prosocial lying.Evolutionary Psychology, 13(3), 1-5.
[37] Pfattheicher, S. (2015). A regulatory focus perspective on reputational concerns: The impact of prevention-focused self-regulation.Motivation and Emotion, 39(6), 932-942.
[38] Pfattheicher S., Schindler S., & Nockur L. (2019). On the impact of Honesty-Humility and a cue of being watched on cheating behavior.Journal of Economic Psychology, 71, 159-174.
[39] Powell K. L., Roberts G., & Nettle D. (2012). Eye images increase charitable donations: Evidence from an opportunistic field experiment in a supermarket.Ethology, 118(11), 1096-1101.
[40] Qin, X., & Wang, S. (2013). Using an exogenous mechanism to examine efficient probabilistic punishment.Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 1-10.
[41] Rosenbaum S. M., Billinger S., & Stieglitz N. (2014). Let’s be honest: A review of experimental evidence of honesty and truth-telling.Journal of Economic Psychology, 45, 181-196.
[42] Rotella A., Sparks A. M., Mishra S., & Barclay P. (2021). No effect of ‘watching eyes’: An attempted replication and extension investigating individual differences.PloS One, 16(10), e0255531.
[43] Sarinopoulos I., Grupe D., Mackiewicz K., Herrington J., Lor M., Steege E., & Nitschke J. (2010). Uncertainty during anticipation modulates neural responses to aversion in human insula and amygdala.Cerebral Cortex, 20(4), 929-940.
[44] Shalvi S., Dana J., Handgraaf M. J. J., & De Dreu, C. K. (2011). Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 181-190.
[45] Sparks, A., & Barclay, P. (2013). Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: The limited effect of a false cue.Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(5), 317-322.
[46] Steinel W., Valtcheva K., Gross J., Celse J., Max S., & Shalvi S. (2022). (Dis)honesty in the face of uncertain gains or losses.Journal of Economic Psychology, 90, 102487.
[47] Tane, K., & Takezawa, M. (2011). Perception of human face does not induce cooperation in darkness.Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 2(2), 24-27.
[48] Teodorescu K., Plonsky O., Ayal S., & Barkan R. (2021). Frequency of enforcement is more important than the severity of punishment in reducing violation behaviors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(42), e2108507118.
[49] Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2018). Daring dishonesty: On the role of sanctions for (un)ethical behavior.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 71-77.
[50] Ting, C. (2020). The feedback loop of rule-breaking: Experimental evidence.Social Science Journal, 57(3), 367-380.
[51] Urs, F., & Franziska, F. H. (2013). Lies in disguise. An experimental study on cheating.Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 525-547.
[52] Zhong C. B., Bohns V. K., & Gino F. (2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior.Psychological Science, 21(3), 311-314.