|
|
|
| The relationship between online public participation and offline prosocial behavior of college students: A moderated mediation model |
| ZHAO Can, GAO Ming, YU Minghua, YANG Xiujun, LIU Jiaxin |
| Hunan Vocational College of Commerce, Changsha 410205 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In order to explore the influence mechanism of college students’ online public welfare participation on offline prosocial behavior and the moderating effect of social anxiety, 512 college students in Hunan Province with experience in online public welfare participation were assessed using the adapted scales for online public welfare participation, public welfare identity, social connection, social anxiety, and offline prosocial behavior. The results indicated that: (1) Online public participation positively predicted offline prosocial behavior; (2) Public welfare identity and social connection each served as mediators, with a chain mediating effect between them; (3) Social anxiety negatively moderated the relationship between social connection and offline prosocial behavior. The findings suggest that online public participation influences offline prosocial behavior through a progressive pathway involving public welfare identity and social connection, while social anxiety negatively moderates the effect of social connection on offline prosocial behaviors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈兰双, 管健. (2025). 亲子国家认同与亲社会行为的主客体互倚分析:自尊的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 33(05), 949-954+961. [2] 侯俊东, 王敏. (2023). 在线公益平台情境下用户连接何以形成:基于过程视角的实证研究.暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 45(08), 86-105. [3] 寇彧, 洪慧芳, 谭晨, 李磊. (2007). 青少年亲社会倾向量表的修订.心理发展与教育, (01), 112-117. [4] 林丽. (2019). 员工职业身份认同对主动性行为的影响研究. 云南大学硕士学位论文. [5] 芦琼莹. (2017). 微公益募捐广告说服策略与个人公益参与行为影响研究. 华中科技大学硕士学位论文. [6] 马丙琴, 李辉, 赵勤英, 李连友. (2023). 亲环境行为溢出效应的机制研究.心理学进展, 13(11), 5121-5131. [7] 孙贺, 马丽娟. (2025). 应对乡村振兴人力资本缺口的域外经验与启示.兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 53(01), 5-15. [8] 孙红刚, 杨雪, 胡义豪, 任丽杰, 周颖, 刘俊升. (2021). Fergus简版社交焦虑与社交恐怖量表的信、效度初步检验.中国临床心理学杂志, 29(03), 534-538. [9] 滕雄程, 雷辉, 李景萱, 文峥. (2021). 大学生社交焦虑对社交网络成瘾的影响:意向性自我调节的调节效应.中国临床心理学杂志, 29(03), 514-517. [10] 王夫寿. (2021). 在线社会资本视角下大学生捐款行为的影响因素研究.高校教育管理, 15(06), 57-66. [11] 应优优. (2018). 公众参与行为的影响因素及城乡差异——基于社会资本的视角. 甘肃行政学院学报, (04), 76-85+127-128. [12] 姚远, 张帆, 程诚. (2024). 优绩主义的代价:家庭成就观如何影响青年互联网公益参与.中国青年研究, (07), 48-56. [13] 杨永娇, 李晨玮. (2023). “情感动员”:大学生公益参与的组织动员策略研究.当代青年研究, (04), 40-53. [14] 杨鑫超, 陈燕铃, 郑俊猛, 张荣祥, 牟晓, 徐强. (2025). 工作记忆负荷对社交焦虑个体注意偏向的调节作用:来自稳态视觉诱发电位的证据.心理学报, 57(10),1729-1744. [15] 郑显亮, 祝春兰, 顾海根. (2011). 大学生网络利他行为量表的编制.中国临床心理学杂志, 19(05), 606-608. [16] 郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 振宙. (2023). 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究.心理发展与教育, 39(03), 333-341. [17] 张誉瀚, 丁凤琴. (2026). 敬畏与初中生亲社会行为的关系:生命意义的中介作用.心理与行为研究, 24(01), 130-137. [18] 张敏, 王乐乐, 刘静. (2014). 感戴对网络利他行为的影响:现实利他行为的中介作用.中国特殊教育, (4), 65-70. [19] 朱芬, 梁钧华, 麻彦坤. (2022). 现实利他行为与网络利他行为对大学生主观幸福感的影响:多重中介模型.心理科学, 45(03), 628-634. [20] Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1430. [21] Boehme S., Miltner W. H., & Straube T. (2015). Neural correlates of self-focused attention in social anxiety.Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(6), 856-862. [22] Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-Perception Theory.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1-62. [23] Caliskan, K. (2025). The concept of value priorities: Could it be the crucial link between prosocial motives and helping behavior? Open Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 449-465. [24] Clark-Gordon C. V., Bowman N. D., Goodboy A. K., & Wright A. (2019). Anonymity and online self-disclosure: A meta-analysis.Communication Reports, 32(2), 98-111. [25] Donnellan M. B., Trzesniewski K. H., Robins R. W., Moffitt T. E., & Caspi A. (2005). Low self-esteem is related to aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency.Psychological Science, 16(4), 328-335. [26] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. [27] Gardner B., Lally P., & Rebar A. L. (2020). Does habit weaken the relationship between intention and behaviour? Revisiting the habit-intention interaction hypothesis.Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(8), e12553. [28] Guo Q., Sun P., & Li L. (2018). Shyness and online prosocial behavior: A study on multiple mediation mechanisms.Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 1-8. [29] Goh C. Z., Ismail A., Amat M. A. C., Keh F. B., & How W. (2025). Effect of perceived social support on internet gaming disorder mediated by social connectedness among emerging adults in Malaysia.Health Education and Health Promotion,13(2), 331-337. [30] Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2010). The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. Routledge. [31] Lacetera N., Macis M., & Mele A. (2016). Viral altruism? Charitable giving and social contagion in online networks. Sociological Science, 3, 202-238. [32] Lin, W., & Cheng, J. (2024). Online volunteering and subjective well-being in China.Hnmanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-6. [33] Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. [34] Rinck M., Rörtgen T., Lange W. G., Dotsch R., Wigboldus D. H., & Becker E. S. (2010). Social anxiety predicts avoidance behaviour in virtual encounters.Cognition and Emotion, 24(7), 1269-1276. [35] Steinhorst J., Klöckner C. A., & Matthies E. (2015). Saving electricity—For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 125-135. [36] Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J.(2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory.Sociad Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284-297. [37] Turner J. C., Hogg M. A., Oakes O. J., Reicher S. D., & Wetherell M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell. [38] Wheele T., Weber C., Windlinger L., Haugen T., & Lindkvist C. A. (2023). Narrative literature review using placemaking theories to unravel student social connectedness in hybrid university learning environments.Buildings, 13, 339. [39] Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2011). The associations between young adults’ face-to-face prosocial behaviors and their online prosocial behaviors.Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1959-1962. [40] Zimet G. D., Dahlem N. W., Zimet S. G., & Farley G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support.Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. |
|
|
|