|
|
|
| National norm and status quo of school engagement in middle school and college |
| GAI Xiaosong1, LIU Fangqing2,3, WU Xiaojing1, WANG Hong1 |
1 School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024;
2 Institute of Mental Health, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 210017;
3 Nanjing Institute of Minor Mental Health Research, Nanjing 210017 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract School engagement, including individuals’ school-related behaviors, thoughts and feelings, was an important indicator of the quality of education. A large-scale investigation was to develop School Engagement Questionnaire, describe the influence factors of school engagement, and develop a school engagement norm of middle, high and college students. The results revealed that the School Engagement Questionnaire had good item discrimination, reliability and validity in middle school, high school and college. Students from high SES family got higher score of school engagement than students from low SES. The influence of family background on school engagement decreased with time. The national average norm, percentile norm and diagnostic criteria of school engagement were established for middle school, high school and college students.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 曹新美. (2021).流动儿童学习投入对学习满意度的影响:学业成绩的中介作用.中国特殊教育, (8), 44-48.
[2] 陈文龙. (2015). 高中化学学习品质量表与常模的修订与完善. 上海师范大学硕士学位论文.
[3] 陈艳红, 程刚, 关雨生, 张大均. (2014). 大学生客观社会经济地位与自尊:主观社会地位的中介作用.心理发展与教育, 30(6), 594-600.
[4] 董存梅, 刘冰瑶. (2016). 初二学生的自我决定动机对其学业投入的影响:成就目标的中介作用.心理与行为研究, 14(1), 57-63.
[5] 段陆生, 李永鑫. (2008). 大学生专业承诺、学习倦怠与学习投入的关系.中国健康心理学杂志, 16(4), 407-409.
[6] 凡勇昆, 邬志辉. (2014). 我国城乡义务教育资源均衡发展研究报告:基于东、中、西部8省17个区(市、县)的实地调查分析.教育研究, 35(11), 32-44.
[7] 李永占. (2018). 父母教养方式对高中生学习投入的影响机制研究.中国临床心理学杂志, 26(5), 167-171.
[8] 李姝雯, 邢红兵, 舒华. (2016). 小学生写作能力发展常模研究. 语言文字应用, (3), 50-60.
[9] 刘春雷, 霍珍珍, 梁鑫(2018). 父母教育卷入对小学生学习投入的影响:感知母亲教育卷入和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用.心理研究, 11(05): 472-478.
[10] 陆璟. (2009). PISA 学习参与度评价.上海教育科研, (12), 4-9.
[11] 马虹, 姚梅林, 吉雪岩. (2015). 家长投入对中小学生学业投入的影响:有中介的调节模型.心理发展与教育, 31(6), 75-76.
[12] 欧阳智, 范兴华. (2018). 家庭社会经济地位、心理资本对农村留守儿童自尊的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志,(6), 1182-1185+1190.
[13] 邵志芳, 陈国鹏, 单阳. (2000). 学习困难儿童诊断量表常模制定.心理科学, 2(2), 41-43.
[14] 师保国, 申继亮. (2007). 家庭社会经济地位、智力和动机与创造性的关系.心理发展与教育, (1), 30-34.
[15] 唐俊超. (2015). 输在起跑线:再议中国社会的教育不平等(1978-2008).社会学研究, (3), 123-145.
[16] 杨晓娟, 曲成毅, 孙喜斌, 朱芳,王菁萍. (2011). 希-内学习能力测验中国3-7岁儿童常模修订.中国临床心理学杂志, 19(2), 195-197.
[17] 叶婷, 吴慧婷. (2012). 低家庭社会经济地位与青少年社会适应的关系:感恩的补偿和调节效应.心理学探新, 32(1), 61-66.
[18] 王光明, 范亚楠, 李健. (2017). 高中生数学元认知的常模及其水平等级标准研究:以天津市为例.天津市教科院学报, 3(3), 52-58.
[19] 王光明, 李健, 侯晓娟. (2020).初中生数学学习策略常模的建立及其应用案例:以天津市为例.数学通报, 59(2), 4-15.
[20] 王光明, 李健, 简婧娴. (2020).初中生数学学习非智力水平常模及其等级评价标准研究:以天津市为例.教育理论与实践, 40(20), 44-48.
[21] 王光明, 李健, 米妍. (2020). 初中生数学元认知水平常模的建立及其应用案例:以天津市为例.天津师范大学学报(基础教育版), 21(4), 12-17.
[22] 王光明, 刘晓昱, 李健. (2017). 高中生数学学习非智力特征的常模及其水平等级标准研究:以天津市为例.天津师范大学学报(基础教育版), 18(3), 50-59.
[23] 王文, 盖笑松, 张玉清, 王国霞. (2018).青少年幸福感对学业发展的影响:学校投入的中介效应.心理学探新, 38(3), 260-266.
[24] 曾嘉鸿, 陆爱桃, 黄子容, 张心怡, 蔡润杨. (2018).自我价值感与学习投入:学习动机和经济状况的有调节中介模型.心理研究(05), 434-443.
[25] 张婵. (2014). 青少年积极品质的成分、测量及其作用. 东北师范大学博士学位论文.
[26] 张秀慧. (2016). 教师自主支持干预对小学生内部动机、投入和学业成绩的影响. 东北师范大学硕士学位论文.
[27] 张书朋, 张庆垚, 李彩娜. (2015).领悟社会支持性别差异的元分析.心理发展与教育, 31(4), 393-401.
[28] Chase P. A., Hilliard L. J., John G. G., Warren D. J., & Lerner R. M. (2014). Academic achievement in the high school years: The changing role of school engagement.Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 43(6), 884-896.
[29] Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence.Journal of Research on Adolescenc, 21(1), 225-241.
[30] Fredricks J. A., Blumenfeld P. C., & Paris A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence.Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
[31] Furlong M. J., Whipple A. D., Jean G. S., Simental J., Soliz A., & Punthuna S. (2003). Multiple contexts of school engagement: Moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice. California School Psychologist, 8(1), 99-113.
[32] Galla B. M., Wood J. J., Tsukayama E., Har K., Chiu A. W., & Langer D. A. (2014). A longitudinal multilevel model analysis of the within-person and between-person effect of effortful engagement and academic self-efficacy on academic performance.Journal of School Psychology, 52(3), 295-308.
[33] Gonzales N. A., Wong J. J., Toomey R. B., Millsap R., & Mauricio A. M. (2014). School engagement mediates long-term prevention effects for mexican american adolescents.Prevention Science, 15(6), 929-939.
[34] Janosz M., Archambault I., Morizot J., & Pagani L. S. (2008). School engagement trajectories and their differential predictive relations to dropout.Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 21-40.
[35] Kasehagen L., Omland L., Bailey M., Biss C., Holmes B., & Kelso P. T. (2018). Relationship of adverse family experiences to resilience and school engagement among Vermont youth.Maternal and Child Health Journal, 22(3), 298-307.
[36] Lam S. F., Jimerson S., Kikas E., Cefai C., Veiga F. H., & Nelson B., et al. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries.Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 77-94.
[37] Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects.American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642-1690.
[38] Reina V. R., Buffel T., Kindekens A., De Backer F., Peeters J., & Lombaerts K. (2014). Enhancing engagement through a community school approach as the key to increase academic achievement.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2078-2084.
[39] Mare, R. D (1980) Social background and school continuation decisions.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75(37), 295-305.
[40] Schaufeli W. B., Martinez I. M., Pinto A. M., Salanova M., & Bakker A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: Across-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481.
[41] Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31-39.
[42] Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective.Learning & Instruction, 28(3), 12-23.
[43] Wang, M. T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence.Child Development, 85(2), 722-737.
[44] Xiong Y., Qin X., Wang Q., & Ren P. (2021). Parental involvement in adolescents’ learning and academic achievement: Cross-lagged effect and mediation of academic engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(8), 1811-1823.
[45] Zhao H., Liu X., & Qi C. (2021). “Want to learn” and “can learn”: Influence of academic passion on college students’ academic engagement.Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-9.
[46] Zhu X., Tian L., Zhou J., & Huebner E. S. (2019). The developmental trajectory of behavioral school engagement and its reciprocal relations with subjective wellbeing in school among Chinese elementary school students. Children and Youth Services Review, 99, 286-295. |
|
|
|
