|
|
|
| The impact of appearance and postural congruency on sense of ownership and agency in virtual hand illusion |
| MA Ke1, HUANG Huang2 |
1 Faculty of Psychology,Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715;
2 Prospect College,Chongqing College of Mobile Communication,Chongqing 401520 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The virtual hand illusion is a classical paradigm to investigate the sense of ownership. With synchronous visual-tactile, proprioceptive and motor information, participants illusorily experience that the virtual hand as their real hand, and feel that they can control it. In this work, the virtual hand illusion was used to investigate the effect of postural and appearance congruency on the explicit and implicit sense of ownership and agency. The results showed that, in both explicit and implicit measurements, postural congruency affected the sense of ownership, but did not affect the sense of agency; Appearance congruency affected both the sense of ownership and sense of agency, while detailed results showed difference. The results suggest that even explicit and implicit ownership and agency are sometimes affected by the same manipulations, their cognitive mechanisms are different.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 马家俊, 魏坤琳, 陈立翰. (2015). 施动感研究的意向捆绑范式述评.心理科学, 38(2), 506-510.
[2] 麻珂. (2021). 虚拟手错觉的跨文化研究:以中国和荷兰被试为例.心理研究, 14(3), 227-235.
[3] 田昊月, 李力红, 徐喆, 李飞. (2018). 最小自我中的施动感.心理科学进展, 26(5), 872-885.
[4] 薛琦, 陆爱桃, 曲星羽, 刘楚麒, 李美荣, 张丽芬. (2018). 识脸错觉与橡胶手错觉下的身份认同:基于内隐联想测验的证据.心理研究, 11(3), 250-260.
[5] 周爱保, 朱婧, 夏瑞雪, 李世峰, 徐科朋, 张荣华等. (2013). 我观故我在? 从橡胶手错觉对自我身体所有权的探讨.心理科学, 36(6), 50-54.
[6] 张静, 李恒威. (2016). 自我表征的可塑性:基于橡胶手错觉的研究.心理科学, 39(2), 299-304.
[7] 张静, 陈巍. (2016). 身体意象可塑吗? 同步性和距离参照系对身体拥有感的影响.心理学报, 48(8), 933-945.
[8] 张淼, 吴迪, 李明, 凌懿白, 张明, 赵科. (2018). 主动控制感的测量及认知神经机制.心理科学进展, 26(10), 1787-1793.
[9] 赵佩琼, 陈巍, 张静, 平贤洁. (2019). 橡胶手错觉: 拥有感研究的实验范式及其应用.心理科学进展, 27(01), 41-54.
[10] Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel' touch that eyes see.Nature, 391, 756.
[11] Braun N., Thorne J. D., Hildebrandt H., & Debener S. (2014). Interplay of agency and ownership: The intentional binding and rubber hand illusion paradigm combined.PLoS ONE, 9, e111967.
[12] Braun N., Debener S., Spychala N., Bongartz E., Sorös P., Müller H. H. O., Philipsen A. (2018). The senses of agency and ownership: A review.Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 535.
[13] Caspar E. A., Cleeremans A., Haggard P. (2015). The relationship between human agency and embodiment.Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 226-236.
[14] Ehrsson H. H., Spence C., & Passingham R. E. (2004). That's my hand！ activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb.Science, 305, 875.
[15] Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 14-21.
[16] Haering, C., & Kiesel, A. (2016). Time perception and the experience of agency.Psychological Research, 80, 286-297.
[17] Haggard P., Clark S., & Kalogeras J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness.Nature Neuroscience, 5, 382-385.
[18] Haggard, P. (2017). Sense of agency in the human brain.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 197-208.
[19] Hohwy, J., & Paton, B. (2010). Explaining away the body: Experiences of supernaturally caused touch and touch on non-hand objects within the rubber hand illusion.PLoS ONE, 5, e9416.
[20] Ide, M. (2013). The effect of “anatomical plausibility” of hand angle on? The rubber-hand illusion.Perception, 42(1), 103-111.
[21] Jeannerod, M. (2003). The mechanism of self-recognition in humans.Behavioural Brain Research, 142, 1-15.
[22] Jensen M., Di Costa S., Haggard P.(2015). Intentional Binding-A Measure of Agency. I M. Overgaard (Red.), Behavioural Methods in Consciousness Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[23] Kalckert, A., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 40.
[24] Ma, K., & Hommel, B. (2013). The virtual-hand illusion: Effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 604.
[25] Ma, K., & Hommel, B. (2015). Body-ownership for actively operated non-corporeal objects.Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 75-86.
[26] Ma K., Hommel B., & Chen H. (2019a). The roles of consistency and exclusivity in perceiving body ownership and agency.Psychological Research, 83, 175-184.
[27] Ma K., Hommel B., & Chen H. (2019b). Context-induced contrast and assimilation in explicit and implicit measures of agency. Scientific Reports, 9, 3883.
[28] Rohde M., Di Luca M., Ernst M. O. (2011). The rubber hand illusion: Feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS ONE, 6, e21659.
[29] Ruess M., Thomaschke R., & Kiesel A. (2018). Intentional binding of visual effects.Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 80(3), 713-722.
[30] Sanchez-Vives M. V., Spanlang B., Frisoli A., Bergamasco M., & Slater M. (2010). Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS ONE, 5, e10381.
[31] Slater M., Perez-Marcos D., Ehrsson H. H., & Sanchez-Vives M. V. (2008). Towards a digital body: The virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2, 6.
[32] Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., & Newen A. (2008a). Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency.Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 219-239.
[33] Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., andNewen A. (2008b). I move, therefore I am: A new theoretical framework to investigate agency and ownership.Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 411-424.
[34] Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 80-91.
[35] Tsakiris M., Carpenter L., James D., & Fotopoulou A. (2010). Hands only illusion: Multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects.Experimental Brain Research, 204, 343-352.
[36] Tsakiris, M. (2010). My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership.Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 703-712.
[37] Tsakiris M., Tajadura-Jiménez A., & Costantini M. (2011). Just a heartbeat away from one's body: Interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1717), 2470-2476.
[38] Tsakiris, M. (2017). The multisensory basis of the self: From body to identity to others.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(4), 597-609.
[39] Yuan, Y., & Steed, A. (2010). Is the rubber hand illusion induced by immersive virtual reality? in IEEE Virtual Reality conference, VR 2010. B. Lok, G. Klinker, and R. Nakatsu (eds.). (Waltham, MA: IEEE Computer Soc), 95-102.
[40] Zopf R., Polito V., Moore J. W. (2018). Revisiting the link between body and agency: Visual movement congruency enhances intentional binding but is not body-specific. Scientific Report, 8, 196. |
|
|
|
