|
|
|
| How to promote employee voice behavior by changing situations：The role of temporal landmarks |
| LI Xiao1, XU Tingting2, DUAN Jinyun2 |
1 Suzhou Industrial Park Institute of Services Outsourcing, Suzhou 215123;
2 School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Employee’s voice behavior is an important role in an organization’s innovation and development. The emergence and function of voice behavior cannot be separated from the situation of the organization. This study aimed to explore the role of temporal landmarks in the process of employee voice by changing the situation. This study discussed how to use the nudge mechanism and took appropriate methods to change the situation to promote employee voice. The study proposed that the influence of temporal landmarks on employee voice was a process that was nudged by external contextual factors, thus affecting employees’ intrinsic voice motivation. The employee voice motivation promoted employee voice behavior, while the change of situation can enhance employee voice motivation and promote employees to have more voice behavior. This process included two steps： The first step was to generate voice motivation through temporal landmarks, that is, the comparison between the present voice-self and the expected future voice-self promotes induced employee voice motivation. The second step was to enhance employees’ voice motivation through the changed of situation to make their employees produce more voice behavior. From the perspective of the nudge, we explored how to use the nudge mechanism and adopted appropriate methods to promote employees’ voice behavior by changing the situation. This integration perspective was helpful for researchers to understand the influencing factors and internal mechanism of employee’s voice behavior, and had important practical implications for promoting the development of the organization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈苗苗, 段锦云, 田晓明. (2015). 人际歧视与员工建言: 一个多重链式中介模型的构建与检验.学习与探索, (11), 117-120.
[2] 陈文平, 段锦云, 田晓明. (2013). 员工为什么不建言: 基于中国文化视角的解析.心理科学进展, 21(05), 905-913.
[3] 段锦云, 黄彩云. (2014). 变革型领导对员工建言的影响机制再探: 自我决定的视角.南开管理评论, 17(4), 98-109.
[4] 段锦云, 凌斌. (2011). 中国背景下员工建言结构及中庸思维对其的影响.心理学报, 43(10), 1185-1197.
[5] 段锦云, 张晨, 田晓明. (2016). 员工建言的发生机制: 来自领导的影响.中国人力资源开发, 347(05), 18-28.
[6] 段锦云, 钟建安. (2005). 组织中的进谏行为.心理科学, 28(01), 69-71.
[7] 段锦云. (2011). 中国背景下建言研究: 结构、形成机制及影响.心理科学进展, 19(02),185-192.
[8] 何贵兵, 李纾, 梁竹苑. (2018). 以小拨大: 行为决策助推社会发展.心理学报, 50(08), 803-813.
[9] 李锐, 凌文辁, 柳士顺. (2009). 上司不当督导对下属建言的影响及其作用机制.心理学报, 41(12), 1189-1202.
[10] 刘宏宇. (1998). 勒温的社会心理学理论评述.社会心理科学, (1), 57-61.
[11] 林丽雪. (2020). 心理所有权对员工建言行为的影响: 一个自我维持模型.心理科学, 43(06), 185-191.
[12] 田晓明, 王先辉, 段锦云. (2011). 组织建言氛围的概念、形成机理及未来展望.苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 32(16), 52-58.
[13] 王元元, 时勘, 殷融. (2018). 多重匹配因素对员工工作投入的影响机制: 员工-主管匹配的调节效应.中国人力资源开发, 35(1), 27-93.
[14] 吴维库, 王未, 刘军, 吴隆增. (2012). 辱虐管理、心理安全感知与员工建言.管理学报, 9(1), 57-63.
[15] 颜爱民, 汪玉霞, 单良. (2018). 中国文化背景下企业社会责任对建言的影响:基于儒家和道家工作价值观的调节作用.软科学, 32(7), 48-51.
[16] 詹小慧, 杨东涛, 栾贞增. (2016). 基于组织支持感调节效应的工作价值观对员工建言影响研究.管理学报, 13(9), 1330-1338.
[17] 赵晓颖, 李爱梅, 王海侠. (2019). 助推目标实现: 时间标记的动力效应.心理科学进展, 27(7), 1275-1283.
[18] Allcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation.Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), 1082-1095.
[19] Ashford S. J., Wellman N., Sully de Luque M., De Stobbeleir K. E., & Wollan M. (2018). Two roads to effectiveness: CEO feedback seeking, vision articulation, and firm performance.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(1), 82-95.
[20] Benartzi S., Beshears J., Milkman K. L., Sunstein C. R., Thaler R. H., & Shankar M,et al. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging?Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041-1055.
[21] Brown, G., & Baer, M. (2011). Location in negotiation: Is there a home field advantage?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(2), 190-200.
[22] Cates, D. A, & Randle, M. N. W. (2010). A positive perspective of citizenship pressure among working adults. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22(3), 330-344.
[23] Cheng J.-W., Lu K.-M., Cheung Y.-H., & Kuo J.-H. (2013). Psychological safety serves as mediator between person-group fit and voice behaviour.International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 12(4-6), 296-309.
[24] Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York: HarperCollins.
[25] Dai, H., & Li, C. (2019). How experiencing and anticipating temporal landmarks influence motivation.Current Opinion in Psychology, 26, 44-48.
[26] Dai H., Milkman K. L., & Riis J. (2014). The fresh start effect: Temporal landmarks motivate aspirational behavior.Management Science, 60(10), 2563-2582.
[27] Dai H., Milkman K. L., & Riis J. (2015). Put your imperfections behind you: Temporal landmarks spur goal initiation when they signal new beginnings.Psychological Science, 26(12), 1927-1936.
[28] Duan J., Kwan H. K., Ling B. (2014). The role of voice efficacy in the formation of voice behaviour: A cross-level examination.Journal of Management & Organization, 20(4), 526-543.
[29] Duan J. Y., Li C. W., Xu Y., Wu C. H. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee voice behavior: A Pygmalion mechanism.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(5), 650-670.
[30] Hoyle, R. H., & Sherrill, M. R. (2006). Future orientation in the self-regulation, and behavior.Journal of Personality, 74, 1673-1696.
[31] Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
[32] Hirschman A. O.(1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[33] Lam C. F., Rees L., Levesque L. L., & Ornstein S. (2018). Shooting from the hip: A habit perspective of voice.Academy of Management Review, 43(3), 470-486.
[34] Lee, J., & Dai, H. (2017). The motivating effects of temporal landmarks: Evidence from the field and lab.Missouri Law Review, 82(3), 683-694.
[35] Liang, J., Tang, J. (2010). A multi-level study on employee voice: Evidence from a chain of retail stores.Frontiers of Business Research in China, 4(1), 541-561.
[36] Liu W., Song Z., & Li X. (2013). Why and when leader’s positive emotion promotes employee voice behavior.Academy of Management Meeting Proceedings 2013(1), 13627-13627.
[37] Liu W., Zhu R., & Yang Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership.The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189-202.
[38] Mackey J. D., Frieder R. E., Brees J. R., & Martinko M. J. (2017). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review.Journal of Management, 43(6), 1940-1965.
[39] Mayfield, J. R., & Mayfield, M. (2017). Raise their voices: The link between motivating language and employee voice.Academy of Management Proceedings.
[40] Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence.The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173-197.
[41] Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2009). Embodied goal pursuit.European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1210-1213.
[42] Oettingen G., Mayer D., Sevincer A., Stephens E. J., Pak H., & Hagenah M. (2009). Mental contrasting and goal commitment: The mediating role of energization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 608-622.
[43] Peetz, J., & Wilson, A. E. (2013). The post-birthday world: Consequences of temporal landmarks for temporal self-appraisal and motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 249-266.
[44] Pierce J. L., Kostova T., & Dirks K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research.Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84-107.
[45] Pierce J. L., Kostova T., & Dirks K. T. (2001). Towards a theory of psychological ownership in organizations.Academy of Management Review, 26, 298-310.
[46] Schneider B., Ehrhart M. G., & Macey W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture.Annual Review of Psychology, 64(2), 361-388.
[47] Schultz P. W., Nolan J. M., Cialdini R. B., Goldstein N. J., & Griskevicius V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms.Psychological Science, 18(5), 429-434.
[48] Shum, M. S. (1998). The role of temporal landmarks in autobiographical memory processes.Psychological Bulletin, 124, 423-442.
[49] Thaler, R., & Sunstein C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. USA: Penguin Books.
[50] Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy ofManagement Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
[51] Wu L., Birtch T. A., Chiang F. F. T., Zhang H. (2016). Perceptions of negative workplace gossip: A self-consistency theory framework.Journal of Management, 44, 1873-1898.
[52] Wilkinson, T. M. (2013). Nudging and manipulation.Political Studies, 61(2), 341-355. |
|
|
|
