净脏启动对负性道德情绪词加工的影响：具身隐喻视角

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.05.005

Psychological Research

2023, Vol. 16

Issue (5): 419-428 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.05.005

Fundamental Research

Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

Influence of clean-dirty priming on the processing of negative moral emotion words： Perspective of embodied metaphor

DING Fengqin, WANG Xiaofang

School of Education, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (969 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on the perspective of embodied metaphor, two experiments of this study, both of them were stroop sentence priming paradigms, were conducted to investigate the effects of environment and self clean-dirty priming on the processing of negative moral emotion words. （1）The results of experiment 1 showed that participants processed negative moral emotion words faster after environment dirty priming than environment clean priming. （2）The results of experiment 2 revealed that participants processed negative moral emotion words quicker after self dirty priming than self clean priming. （3）The comparative analysis of the outcomes of these two experiments found that self-dirty priming, compared with environment dirty priming, significantly accelerated the response time of negative moral emotion words, which mainly manifested in shame, guilt and embarrassment. The above results indicate that individuals’ dirty experiences from environment and self are metaphorically associated with the concepts of negative moral emotion. In addition, people react the concept words of negative moral emotion faster under the prime of self dirty.

Key words： clean and dirty negative moral emotion embodied metaphor embodied cognitive theory

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	DING Fengqin
	WANG Xiaofang

Cite this article:

DING Fengqin,WANG Xiaofang. Influence of clean-dirty priming on the processing of negative moral emotion words： Perspective of embodied metaphor[J]. Psychological Research, 2023, 16(5): 419-428.

URL:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/EN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.05.005 OR http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/EN/Y2023/V16/I5/419

[1] 北京语言学院编印. (1986). 现代汉语频率词典. 北京语言学院.
[2] 常行, 冯申梅, 陈玮, 甘海英, 朱金富. (2020). 厌恶启动后水平空间隐喻加工的时间特征:来自事件相关电位(ERPs)的证据.中国健康心理学杂志, 28(2), 266-269.
[3] 陈英和, 白柳, 李龙凤. (2015). 道德情绪的特点、发展及其对行为的影响.心理与行为研究, 13(5), 627-636.
[4] 丁凤琴, 王喜梅, 刘钊. (2017). 道德概念净脏隐喻及其对道德判断的影响.心理发展与教育, 33(6), 666-674.
[5] 贾宁, 陈换娟, 鲁忠义. (2018). 句子启动范式下的道德概念空间隐喻:匹配抑制还是匹配易化?心理发展与教育, 34(5), 541-547.
[6] 李昳, 陆桂芝, 李勇. (2018). 自我关注与社交焦虑:负面评价恐惧的中介与关系型自我构念的调节.心理科学, 41(5), 1261-1267.
[7] 梁晓燕, 马虹, 范红霞. (2012). 大学生道德情绪对身体洁净内隐认知影响的研究.教育研究与实验, (5), 73-78.
[8] 李莹, 张灿, 王悦. (2019). 道德情绪在道德隐喻映射中的作用及其神经机制.心理科学进展, 27(7), 1224-1231.
[9] 鲁忠义, 贾利宁, 翟冬雪. (2017). 道德概念垂直空间隐喻理解中的映射:双向性及不平衡性.心理学报, 49(2), 186-196.
[10] 罗一丽, 张辉. (2016). 英汉道德隐喻对比研究:基于语料库“肮脏(dirt) /干净(cleanliness)”的隐喻表征.外语研究, 33(6), 18-24.
[11] 钱铭怡, 戚健俐. (2002). 大学生羞耻和内疚差异的对比研究.心理学报, 34(6), 626-633.
[12] 王博韬, 魏萍. (2021). 道德情绪:探寻道德与创造力关系的新视角.心理科学进展, 29(2), 268-275.
[13] 王继瑛, 叶浩生, 苏得权. ( 2018). 身体动作与语义加工:具身隐喻的视角.心理学探新, 38(1), 15-19.
[14] 解晴楠, 任维聪, 王汉林. (2019). 善与恶的重量意象:道德概念的重量隐喻研究.心理研究, 12(3), 227-232.
[15] 颜志雄, 燕良轼, 范伟, 丁道群, 邹霞. (2014). 身体清洁启动后道德纯洁词加工的时间特征:来自ERPs的证据.心理与行为研究, 12(5), 609-615.
[16] 叶浩生. (2017). 具身认知的原理与应用. 北京:商务出版社.
[17] 殷融, 叶浩生. (2014). 道德概念的黑白隐喻表征及其对道德认知的影响.心理学报, 46(9), 1331-1346.
[18] 张裕鼎, 张翀, 吴鹏. (2020). 道德概念的软硬隐喻表征及其对道德判断的影响.教育研究与实验, (4), 33-39.
[19] 赵岩, 伍麟. (2019). 具身认知视角下的道德隐喻表征.心理学探新, 39(4), 308-313.
[20] 周详, 杨治良, 郝雁丽. (2007). 理性学习的局限:道德情绪理论对道德养成的启示.道德与文明, (3), 57-60.
[21] 朱金富, 陈玮, 蒲明慧, 冯申梅. (2018). 厌恶启动后垂直空间隐喻加工的时间特征.中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 27(3), 266-271.
[22] Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C, & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328, 1712-1715.
[23] Chapman H. A., Kim D. A., Susskind J. M., & Anderson A. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust.Science, 323, 1179-1180.
[24] Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 665-697.
[25] Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A. G., & Buchner A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.Behavior Research Methods, 39 (2), 175-191.
[26] Frimer, J. A. & Sinclair, L. (2016). Moral heroes look up and to the right.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(3), 400-410.
[27] Holland R. W., Hendriks M., & Aarts H. (2005). Smells like clean spirit: Nonconscious effects of scent on cognition and behavior.Psychological Science, 16(9), 689-693.
[28] Holzman, J. B., & Valentiner, D. P. (2016). Self-focused attention affects subsequent processing of positive (but not negative) performance appraisals.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 50, 295-302.
[29] Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. London： The university of Chicago press.
[30] Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression.Psychological Science, 21(10), 1423-1425.
[31] Liljenquist K., Zhong C. B., & Galinsky A. D. (2010). The smell of virtue clean scents promote reciprocity and charity.Psychological Science, 21(3), 381-383.
[32] Meier B. P., Robinson M. D., & Clore G. L. (2004). Why good guys wear white.Psychological Science, 15(2), 82-87.
[33] Meier B. P., Sellbom M., & Wygant D. B. (2007). Failing to take the moral high ground: Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality.Personality and Individual Differences, 43 (4), 757-767.
[34] Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316, 1002-1005.
[35] Schnall S., Benton J., & Harvey S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments.University of Plymouth, 19(12), 1219-1222.
[36] Schnall S., Haidt J., Clore G. L., & Jordan A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096-1109.
[37] Sherman, G. D., & Clore, G. L. (2009). The color of sin white and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution.Psychological Science, 20, 1019-1025.
[38] Sheikh S., Botindari L., & White E. (2013). Embodied metaphors and emotions in the moralization of restrained eating practices.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 509-513.
[39] Tang H., Lu X., Su R., Liang Z., Mai X., & Liu C. (2017). Washing away your sins in the brain: Physical cleaning and priming of cleaning recruit different brain networks after moral threat.Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 12 (7), 1149-1158.
[40] Tangney J. P., Miller, R. S, Flicker, L., & Barlow D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1256-1269.
[41] Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636.
[42] Winkielman P., Niedenthal P., Wielgosz J., Eelen J., & Kavanagh L. C. (2015). Embodiment of cognition and emotion. APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology:1. Attitudes and Social Cognition, M. Mikulincer and P. R. Shaver (Editors-in-Chief).
[43] Xu H., Bègue L., & Bushman B. J. (2014). Washing the guilt away: Effects of personal versus vicarious cleansing on guilty feelings and prosocial behavior.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1-5.
[44] Zhai D., Guo Y., & Lu Z. (2018). A dual mechanism of cognition and emotion in processing moral-vertical metaphors.Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-9.
[45] Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing.Science, 313 (5792), 1451-1452.
[46] Zhong C. B., Strejcek B., & Sivanathan N. (2010). A clean self can render harsh moral judgment.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 859-862.