|
|
|
| Research on the influence of servant leadership on civil servants’ responsible behavior from the perspective of resource conservation |
| Hu Jing1, Luo Yingying2 |
1 Beijing Police College, Beijing 102202;
2 Changjun Meixihu School of Changsha, Changsha 410221 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a leadership style most aligned with the “service” core of government departments, servant leadership plays a significant role in enhancing the responsible behavior of civil servants. This study, grounded in the perspective of resource conservation, introduced relational energy as a mediating variable and political skill as a moderating variable to explore the mechanism and boundary conditions of servant leadership’s impact on the responsible behavior of civil servants. Through a a longitudinal survey of 396 civil servants, the study found that servant leadership positively affectd the responsible behavior of civil servants, relational energy played a mediating role between servant leadership and civil servants’ responsible behavior, and political skill not only positively moderated the impact of servant leadership on relational energy but also further moderated the positive mediation of relational energy between servant leadership and civil servants’ responsible behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈晓暾, 程姣姣. (2021). 包容型领导研究述评与中国视域下的展望. 科研管理, 42(10), 174-181.
[2] 代向阳, 彭剑锋, 尹奎. (2021). 领导行为与领导幸福感:理论梳理与模型整合. 现代管理科学, (8), 46-56.
[3] 段锦云, 杨静, 朱月龙. (2020). 资源保存理论:内容、理论比较及研究展望. 心理研究, 13(1), 49-57.
[4] 高中华, 赵晨. (2014). 工作场所的组织政治会危害员工绩效吗?基于个人-组织契合理论的视角. 心理学报, 46(8), 1124-1143.
[5] 韩鹏,唐炎钊.(2024).领导排斥与员工越轨创新行为关系研究:表面顺从的中介作用与政治技能的调节作用. 科技进步与对策, 41(23),138-148.
[6] 姜平, 张丽华. (2022). 领导幽默与下属前瞻行为:工作繁荣的中介作用与政治技能的调节作用. 管理评论, 34(4),194-203.
[7] 蒋小群, 李超平. (2020). 校长服务型领导如何降低教师情绪衰竭:心理安全感和不确定性规避的作用. 教育学报, 16(2), 109-118.
[8] 柯江林, 闫晓岑, 蒋一凡. (2020). 公仆式领导对公务员下属服务动机的双元激发路径:职场精神力与LMX中介视角. 中国行政管理, (3), 92-100.
[9] 李地婉, 胡翔, 李燕萍. (2018). 下属与公仆型领导互动能更好地履行家庭责任吗?基于互动仪式理论视角. 预测, 37(6), 40-46.
[10] 李燕萍,涂乙冬. (2011). 与领导关系好就能获得职业成功吗?一项调节的中介效应研究. 心理学报, 43(8), 941-952.
[11] 李云, 毛亚宣, 江易华. (2018). 组织差错管理氛围对员工职业成长的影响:职业胜任力与公仆型领导的作用. 中国人力资源开发, 35(4), 43-52.
[12] 刘镜, 赵晓康, 沈华礼. (2020). 员工职业生涯规划有益于其创新行为吗?持续学习和自我效能的中介作用及组织氛围的调节作用. 预测, 39(4), 53-60.
[13] 刘军, 宋继文, 吴隆增. (2008). 政治与关系视角的员工职业发展影响因素探讨. 心理学报, 40(2), 201-209.
[14] 舒睿, 梁建. (2015). 基于自我概念的伦理领导与员工工作结果研究. 管理学报, 12(7), 1012-1020.
[15] 孙思睿, 刘帮成. (2019). 变革情境下高承诺工作系统何以提升责任行为:灵丹妙药还是情境受限?中国人力资源开发, 36(12), 37-52.
[16] 谭新雨, 刘帮成. (2017). 服务型领导、心理所有权与员工建言行为的研究:权力距离导向的调节作用. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 25(5), 49-58.
[17] 唐健, 方振邦. (2020). 服务型领导对公务员创新行为的影响机制. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 28(2), 88-98.
[18] 王苗苗, 张捷, 胡文安, 等. (2023). 双元领导对员工工作投入的双刃剑效应:权力距离的调节作用. 心理科学, 46(4), 921-928.
[19] 王琦, 方至诚. (2019). 服务型领导与员工服务绩效关系研究. 技术经济与管理研究, (10), 57-63.
[20] 王颖, 倪超, 刘秋燕. (2015). 中国公务员职业倦怠的产生过程:社会支持与应对方式的调节效应. 中国行政管理, (4), 118-122.
[21] 王振宇, 涂畅, 王贝. (2018). 大学生责任认知对责任行为的作用机制:实证分析及对策研究. 广西社会科学,(9), 193-198.
[22] 肖宇佳, 潘安成. (2018). “以理”还是“入情”? 创业者政治技能与资源获取. 管理科学学报. 21(2), 48-67.
[23] 阎寒, 段锦云. (2013). 服务型领导:概念结构、形成机制和影响效能. 心理研究, (3), 63-68.
[24] 叶龙, 肖凤展, 郭名. (2019). 师徒关系对徒弟创新行为影响研究:基于能量视角. 技术经济, 38(9), 24-31.
[25] 张静, 陈汇涓, 倪丹. (2024). 基于领导正念赋能视角的员工工作繁荣形成机制研究. 中国人力资源开发, 41(3), 6-20.
[26] 张征. (2016).下属-主管匹配与员工的工作幸福感:领导-成员交换和政治技能的作用. 心理科学, 39(5), 1204-1209.
[27] 赵国祥, 王明辉, 凌文辁. (2004). 管理者责任心和工作绩效关系的研究. 心理科学, 27(5), 1261-1262.
[28] 周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[29] 朱玥, 王晓辰. (2015).服务型领导对员工建言行为的影响:领导-成员交换和学习目标取向的作用. 心理科学, 38(2), 426-432.
[30] Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[31] Bao Y., Li C., & Zhao H. (2018). Servant leadership and engagement: A dual mediation model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(6), 406-417.
[32] Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
[33] Bing M. N., Davison H. K., Minor I., Novicevic M. M., & Frink D. D. (2011). The prediction of task and contextual performance by political skill: A meta-analysis and moderator test. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 563-577.
[34] Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2016). Linking servant leadership to individual performance: Differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need satisfaction. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 124-141.
[35] Farh J., Tsui A. S., Xin K., & Cheng B. (1998). The influence of relational demography and Guanxi: The chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4), 471-488.
[36] Ferris G. R., Treadway D. C., Kolodinsky R. W., Hochwarter W. A., Kacmar C. J., Douglas C., & Frink D. D. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31(1), 126-152.
[37] Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). The role of exhaustion and workarounds in predicting occupational injuries: A cross-lagged panel study of health care professionals. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 1-16.
[38] Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1-22.
[39] Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
[40] Hobfoll S. E., Halbesleben J., Neveu J., & Westman M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103-128.
[41] Jawahar M., Meurs J. A., Ferris G. R., & Hochwarte W. A. (2008). Self-efficacy and political skill as comparative predictors of task and contextual performance: A two-study constructive replication. Human Performance, 21(2).
[42] Lapointe, é., & Vandenberghe, C. (2018). Examination of the relationships between servant leadership, organizational commitment, and voice and antisocial behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 99-115.
[43] Liden R. C., Wayne S. J., Meuser J. D., Hu J., Wu J., & Liao C. (2015). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 254-269.
[44] Liden R. C., Wayne S. J., Liao C., & Meuser J. D. (2014). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1434-1452.
[45] Owens B. P., Baker W. E., Sumpter D. M., & Cameron K. S. (2016). Relational energy at work: Implications for job engagement and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 35-49.
[46] Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J., & Podsakoff N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
[47] Schwarz G., Newman A., Cooper B., & Eva N. (2016). Servant leadership and follower job performance: The mediating effect of public service motivation. Public Administration, 94(4), 1025-1041.
[48] Walumbwa F. O., Morrison E. W., & Christensen A. L. (2012). Ethical leadership and group in-role performance: The mediating roles of group conscientiousness and group voice. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 953-964.
[49] Yang F., Liu J., Wang Z., & Zhang Y. (2019). Feeling energized: A multilevel model of spiritual leadership, leader integrity, relational energy, and job performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(4), 983-997. |
|
|
|
