|
|
|
| Testing multi-group measurement invariance of proactive behavior scale across organization contexts in China |
| GUO Tengfei1, SHANG Sudong2, CHEN Yongqiang3 |
1 School of Vocational Education, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou 510665;
2 Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222;
3 School of Psychology, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract To test the measurement invariance of the proactive behavior scale across three groups of employee from different organization contexts. The study investigated 1291 employees from state-owned enterprise, private enterprise and foreign-capital enterprise by random sampling method, and examined multi-group invariance of Proactive Behavior Scale in the three samples. The confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that three factor model of proactive behavior scale had better fit index than other competitive models, and we conducted multi-group analysis based on the best fit three factor model. The multi-group analysis indicated that three factor model was equivalent across the three samples, supporting configural invariance, metric invariance, scalar invariance, strict invariance and factor variance invariance model. The three factor structure of Proactive Behavior Scale had measurement invariance across different organization contexts within China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 程长, 何嘉悦, 余吟吟, 钟雪, 李楚婷, 张小崔, 明庆森, 姚树桥. (2021). 中文版状态-特质焦虑量表的测量等值性研究.中国临床心理学杂志, 29(01), 68-73.
[2] 崔明, 鲁珍珍, 黄越慈. (2009). 国有企业与民营企业文化的差异及影响因素研究.华东经济管理, 23(2), 112-115.
[3] 贾建锋, 赵雪冬, 赵若男. (2020). 人力资源管理强度如何影响员工的主动行为:基于自我决定理论.中国人力资源开发, 37(03), 6-17.
[4] 李灿, 辛玲. (2008). 调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究.中国卫生统计, 25(5), 541-544.
[5] 李锐, 田晓明. (2014). 主管威权领导与下属前瞻行为:一个被中介的调节模型构建与检验.心理学报, 46(11), 1719-1733.
[6] 任芬, 刘峻良, 房玉上, 王孟成. (2019). 流调中心抑郁量表在成人群体中的跨性别等值性.中国临床心理学杂志, 27(05), 973-977.
[7] 杨振芳, 陈庆文, 朱瑜, 曾柏森. (2016). 精神型领导是员工主动性行为的驱动因素吗?一个多重中介效应模型的检验.管理评论, 28(11), 191-202.
[8] 王晓晖. (2007). 学习型组织文化的差异与影响研究: 基于广东地区国有企业和民营企业样本相比较的实证分析.管理世界, (11), 76-86.
[9] Cai Z., Parker S. K., Chen Z., & Lam W. (2019). How does the social context fuel the proactive fire? A multilevel review and theoretical synthesis.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 209-230.
[10] Cangiano F., Parker S. K., & Yeo G. B. (2019). Does daily proactivity affect well-being? The moderating role of punitive supervision.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 59-72.
[11] Carpini J., Parker S., & Griffin M. (2017). A look back and a leap forward: A review and synthesis of the individual work performance literature.Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 825-885.
[12] Cullen‐Lester K. L., Leroy H., Gerbasi A., & Nishii L. (2016). Energy’s role in the extraversion (dis) advantage: How energy ties and task conflict help clarify the relationship between extraversion and proactive performance.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(7), 1003-1022.
[13] Griffin M. A., Neal A., & Parker S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts.Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.
[14] Griffin M. A., Parker S. K., & Mason C. M. (2010). Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study.Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 174-182.
[15] Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press..
[16] Jeong S., Song J., & Hsiao Y. Y. (2018). Testing multi‐group measurement invariance of data from the knowledge creation practice inventory.Human Resource Development Quarterly, 29(3), 243-262.
[17] Liu W., Tangirala S., Lee C., & Parker S. K. (2019). New directions for exploring the consequences of proactive behaviors: Introduction to the special issue.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 1-4.
[18] Marques-Quinteiro, P., & Curral, L. A. (2012). Goal orientation and work role performance: Predicting adaptive and proactive work role performance through self-leadership strategies.The Journal of Psychology, 146(6), 559-577.
[19] Parker, S. K., & Liao, J. (2016). Wise proactivity: How to be proactive and wise in building your career.Organizational Dynamics, 45(3), 217-227.
[20] Parker S. K., Wang Y., & Liao J. (2019). When is proactivity wise? A review of factors that influence the individual outcomes of proactive behavior.Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 221-248.
[21] Schilpzand, P., & Huang, L. (2018). When and how experienced incivility dissuades proactive performance: An integration of sociometer and self-identity orientation perspectives.Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 828-841.
[22] Shi D., Song H., & Lewis M. D. (2019). The impact of partial factorial invariance on cross-group comparisons.Assessment, 26(7), 1217-1233.
[23] Song J. H., Yoon S. W., & Uhm D. (2012). Systematic and practical measurement of organizational knowledge creation: Developing and validating the knowledge creation practice inventory.Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(7), 616-631.
[24] Suseno Y., Standing C., Gengatharen D., & Nguyen D. (2020). Innovative work behaviour in the public sector: The roles of task characteristics, social support, and proactivity.Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(1), 41-59.
[25] Urbach T., Den Hartog D. N., Fay D., Parker S. K., & Strauss K. (2021). Cultural variations in whether, why, how, and at what cost people are proactive: A followership perspective.Organizational Psychology Review, 11(1), 3-34.
[26] Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research.Organizational Research Method, 3, 4-70.
[27] Watson A. M., Thompson L. F., & Meade A. W. (2007). Measurement invariance of the job satisfaction survey across work contexts. In22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York. |
|
|
|
