灾后心理恢复对员工工作激情的影响研究：一个有调节的中介模型

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.02.008

Psychological Research

2023, Vol. 16

Issue (2): 161-171 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.02.008

Applied Psychology Research

Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

The effect of post-disaster psychological recovery on employees' work passion：A moderated mediation model

JIA yanling¹, HAO Riyan¹, WANG Ning^1,2, TIAN Zhenzhen¹, BAI Xiaoya¹

1 School of Management, Xian Polytechnic University, Xi'an 710048;
2 School of Management, Xian Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (1108 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on the resource conservation theory, this study adopted questionnaire survey and introduced post-disaster psychological recovery to explore the mediating role of work meaningfulness between post-disaster psychological recovery and employees' work passion, as well as the moderating role of leaders' empathy. The results of 607 survey data showed that：（1） Post-disaster psychological recovery positively affected work passion;（2） Work meaningfulness played a partial mediating role in the relationship between the dimensions of post-disaster psychological recovery and work passion;（3） Leader empathy negatively moderated the relationship between the dimensions of post-disaster psychological recovery and work meaningfulness;（4） The moderating effect of leader empathy on the relationship between post traumatic growth and work passion was more significant in low leader empathy. Through this research, it is expected to provide beneficial enlightenment and practical guidance for organizations and individuals to tide over the epidemic smoothly, arouse their work passion and maintain the vitality of enterprises.

Key words： psychological recovery PTG work meaningfulness work passion leader empathy

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	JIA yanling
	HAO Riyan
	WANG Ning
	TIAN Zhenzhen
	BAI Xiaoya

Cite this article:

JIA yanling,HAO Riyan,WANG Ning, et al. The effect of post-disaster psychological recovery on employees' work passion：A moderated mediation model[J]. Psychological Research, 2023, 16(2): 161-171.

URL:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/EN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.02.008 OR http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/EN/Y2023/V16/I2/161

[1] 陈燕军. (2010). 唤醒员工的工作激情. 人力资源, 33(11), 29-31.
[2] 陈杰灵, 伍新春, 安媛媛. (2015). 创伤后成长的促进:基本原理与主要方法. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 67(6), 114-122.
[3] 段锦云, 杨静, 朱月龙. (2020). 资源保存理论:内容、理论比较及研究展望. 心理研究, 13(1), 49-57.
[4] 蒋昀洁, 张绿漪, 黄庆, 蒋春燕. (2017). 工作激情研究述评与展望. 外国经济与管理, 39(8), 85-101.
[5] 姜诗尧, 郝金磊, 李方圆. (2019). 资源保存理论视角下领导-成员交换对员工创新行为的影响. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 21(6), 92-99.
[6] 刘夏怡. (2017). 领导者共情能力对泛90后员工适应性绩效影响机制研究. 华侨大学硕士学位论文.
[7] 吕梦思, 席居哲, 罗一睿. (2017). 不同心理弹性者的日常情绪特征:结合体验采样研究的证据. 心理学报, 49(7), 928-940.
[8] 孟亮, 欧阳枫. (2019). 追梦人还是螺丝钉? 意义追寻重塑工作体验. 清华管理评论, 11(10), 63-68.
[9] 缪佩君, 谢姗姗, 陈则飞, 连榕. (2018). 幼儿教师心理弹性与职业倦怠的关系:大五人格的中介效应. 心理与行为研究, 16(4), 512-517.
[10] 田喜洲, 左晓燕, 彭小平. (2017). 工作意味着什么: 工作意义概念、影响与研究框架. 心理研究, 10(2), 56-66.
[11] 涂阳军, 郭永玉. (2010). 创伤后成长:概念、影响因素、与心理健康的关系. 心理科学进展, 18(1), 114-122.
[12] 汪妍. (2019). 变革型领导对员工工作投入的影响研究: 基于共情理论视角. 大庆社会科学, 37(4), 140-142.
[13] 王文超, 伍新春. (2020). 共情对灾后青少年亲社会行为的影响:感恩、社会支持和创伤后成长的中介作用. 心理学报, 52(03), 307-316.
[14] 温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷. (2005). 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报, 66(2), 268-274.
[15] 杨可可. (2019). 变革型领导对员工工作激情的影响研究. 安徽工业大学硕士学位论文.
[16] 杨艳玲. (2013). 灾后心理恢复概论. 北京: 清华大学出版社.
[17] 叶新凤, 李新春, 王智宁. (2014). 安全氛围对员工安全行为的影响: 心理资本中介作用的实证研究. 软科学, 28(1), 86-90.
[18] 杨红, 彭灿, 杜刚, 许春, 吕潮林. (2021). 双元领导风格、团队差序氛围与研发团队创造力. 科学学研究, 39(7), 1248-1256.
[19] 尹奎, 刘娜. (2016). 工作重塑、工作意义与任务复杂性、任务互依性的调节作用. 商业研究, 64(11), 112-116.
[20] 尹奎, 张凯丽, 李秀凤. (2019). 工作重塑对工作意义的影响:团队任务绩效、领导-成员交换关系差异化的作用. 管理评论, 31(3), 143-153.
[21] 张剑, 宋亚辉, 叶岚, Zakaria Hocine. (2014). 工作激情研究:理论及实证. 心理科学进展, 22(8), 1269-1281.
[22] 周宵, 伍新春, 王文超, 田雨馨. (2018). 青少年重复创伤暴露与创伤后应激障碍的关系:安全感与认知重评的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(1), 90-97.
[23] Allan B. A., Autin K. L., & Duffy R. D. (2016). Self-determination and meaningful work: Exploring socioeconomic constraints. Front Psychol, 7(186), 126-140.
[24] Anaïs Thibault-Landry, Egan R., Crevier-Braud L., Manganelli L., & Forest J.(2017). An empirical investigation of the employee work passion appraisal model using self-determination theory. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(2), 148-168.
[25] Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
[26] Byrd T., Brien O., Delongis A., Pomaki G., & Zwicker A. (2009). Couples coping with stress: The role of empathic responding. European Psychologist, 14(1), 18-28.
[27] Davis C. G., Wohl M., & Verberg N. (2007). Profiles of posttraumatic growth following an unjust loss. Death Study, 31(8), 693-712.
[28] Demirtas O., Hannah S. T., Gok K., Arslan A., & Capar N. (2017). The moderated influence of ethical leadership, via meaningful work, on followers' engagement, organizational identification, and envy. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 1-17.
[29] Dutton, W. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201.
[30] Grandey, Alicia, & A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95-110.
[31] Grant A. M., Ca Mpbell E. M., Chen G., Cottone K., Lapedis D., & Lee K. (2007). Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: The effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 53-67.
[32] Grills-Taquechel A. E., Littleton H. L., & Axsom D. (2011). Social support, world assumptions, and exposure as predictors of anxiety and quality of life following a mass trauma. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(4), 498-506.
[33] Hayes, A. F., & Ph, D. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
[34] Ho V. T., Wong S., & Lee C. H.(2011). A tale of passion: Linking job passion and cognitive engagement to employee work performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 26-47.
[35] Hobfoll, S. E., & Wells, J. D. (1998). Conservation of resources, stress, and aging: Why do some slide and some spring? In J. Lomranz (Ed.), Handbook of aging and mental health: An integrative approach(pp. 121-134).
[36] Indriasari, I., & Setyorini, N. (2018). The impact of work passion on work performance: The moderating role of P-O fit and meaningfulness of work. Diponegoro International Journal of Business, 1(1), 26-32.
[37] Joo B. K., Bozer G., & Ready K. J. (2019). A dimensional analysis of psychological empowerment on engagement (online earlycite). Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance, 6(3), 186-203.
[38] Kiewitz C., Hochwarter W. A., Ferris G. R., & Castro S. L. (2010). The role of psychological climate in neutralizing the effects of organizational politics on work outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(6), 1189-1207.
[39] Levine, S. Z., Laufer, A. (2009). Examining the relationship between resilience and posttraumatic growth. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(4), 282-286.
[40] Lysova E. I., Allan B. A., Dik B. J., Duffy R. D., & Steger M. F. (2018). Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110(7), 374-389.
[41] Masten, & Ann, S. (2001). Ordinary magic. Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227-238.
[42] Nathalie, Houlfort, Frédérick, L., Philippe, & Robert, et al. (2013). On passion and heavy work investment: Personal and organizational outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(1), 25-45.
[43] Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Work engagement. What do we know and where do we go? Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(1), 3-10.
[44] Stephens, T. M. (2013). Nursing student resilience: A concept clarification. John Wiley & Sons, 48(2), 125-133.
[45] Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1-18.
[46] Vallerand R. J.,& Houlfort, N. (2003). Passion at work: Toward a new conceptualization. North Carolina: Information Age Publishing, 175-204.
[47] Vollhardt, J. R. (2009). Altruism born of suffering and prosocial behavior following adverse life events: A review and conceptualization. Social Justice Research, 22(1), 53-97.
[48] Wang H., Law K. S., Hackett R., Wang D., & Chen Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420-432.
[49] Zapf, D. (2003). Emotion work and psychological well-being: A review of the literature and some conceptual considerations. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 237-268.
[50] Zigarmi, D., & Nimon, K.(2011). A cognitive approach to work intention: The stuff that employee work passion is made of? Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(4), 447-461.
[51] Zigarmi D., Nimon K., Houson D., Witt D., & Diehl J. (2011). A preliminary field test of an employee work passion model. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 195-221.
[52] Zigarmi D., Nimon K., Houson D., & Witt D. (2015). Beyond engagement: Toward a framework and operational definition for employee work passion. Human Resource Development Review, 8(3), 300-326.