李小平, 葛明贵. 隐喻句在线加工的特征、影响因素及机制[J]. 心理研究, 2024, 17(6): 491-502.
LI Xiaoping, GE Minggui. The characteristics, influencing factors and mechanism of online processing of metaphorical sentences. Psychological Research, 2024, 17(6): 491-502.
[1] 白亚停, 孟杰, 何文广. (2021). 时间词汇加工中的时空隐喻效应:来自阈上/阈下加工的证据.心理研究, (01), 20-28. [2] 陈庆荣, 谭顶良, 蔡厚德. (2012).汉语句子理解中句法启动机制的眼动和ERP研究.心理科学进展, (11), 1727-1734. [3] 陈淑丹, 李春玉, 陈穗清. (2020). 学前听障儿童隐喻的加工及理解.中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 18(1), 50-53. [4] 龚玉苗, 周榕. (2009). 隐喻生涯模型及其解释力.外国语文, 25(3), 65-70. [5] 郭晶晶, 赵婧超. (2017). 熟悉性对汉语隐喻义与本义加工机制的影响. 心理科学, 40(6), 1302-1308. [6] 居银. (2010). 隐喻义与字面义加工时程差异的ERP研究. 上海师范大学硕士学位论文. [7] 李莹, 刘俊, 张灿, 王悦. (2019).不同性质的汉语高熟悉度隐喻意义加工过程:来自ERP研究的证据.心理学探新, 39(4), 337-344. [8] 李莹, 莫雷, 史大鹏, 张学新. (2016).不同性质汉语隐喻句认知加工的fMRI研究.浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 46(6), 33-45. [9] 李骋诗, 白学军, 王永胜. (2020). 映射具体性和语境线索对新颖隐喻加工的影响.心理与行为研究, 18(2), 153-160. [10] 李梦娜, 陈穗清, 张庆华.(2020). 5-6岁听觉障碍儿童隐喻理解能力的研究.中国特殊教育, (7), 57-66. [11] 李胜梅. (2014). 现代汉语比喻关系词研究. 河北大学博士学位论文. [12] 林嘉懿. (2020). 隐喻性质及熟悉度对隐喻加工进程的影响. 福建师范大学硕士学位论文. [13] 刘菁, 冯涛, 韩骏. (2006).两种隐喻理解的认知理论研究.首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), (4), 121-124. [14] 刘菁, 张必隐. (2002). 本体和喻体在隐喻句理解中的作用.心理科学, 25(3), 363-364. [15] 刘涛, 杨亦鸣. (2016). 基于事件相关电位的空语类分类的神经机制研究.外语研究, (5), 14-21. [16] 刘宇红. (2015).隐喻映射的双向性:隐喻生涯视角. 外国语言文学, 32(1), 1-6+31+72. [17] 潘琳玲, 朱守信. (2015).隐喻关系的可逆性研究. 解放军外国语学院学报, 38(1), 92-99. [18] 孙颖, 葛明贵, 宣宾. (2020).语言理解中汉语句法启动的“词汇增益”研究: 来自眼动的证据.外语学刊, (215), 72-77. [19] 唐世民. (2007). 隐喻理解的特征赋予模型.外语与外语教学, (9), 9-13. [20] 唐雪梅, 任维, 胡卫平. (2016).科学语言的认知神经加工机制研究:来自ERP的证据.心理科学, 39(5), 1071-1079. [21] 唐雪梅. (2016). 科学隐喻认知加工的ERP研究. 陕西师范大学博士学位论文. [22] 吴念阳, 陈俊卿, 居银, 白洁, 马子凤. (2012).汉语隐喻理解时程的ERPs研究.心理科学, 35(4), 811-816. [23] 解晴楠, 任维聪, 王汉林. (2019). 善与恶的重量意象:道德概念的重量隐喻研究.心理研究, (03),227-232. [24] 杨亦鸣, 刘涛. (2013).汉语话题句中语迹的神经机制研究.中国社会科学, (6), 146-208. [25] 易保树, 倪传斌. (2020). 执行工作记忆在二语者隐喻句理解加工中的作用.外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 43(3), 67-79. [26] 张欣. (2017). 二语隐喻理解中本体与喻体的抑制机制研究. 大连理工大学硕士学位论文. [27] 张伯江. (2018). 构式语法应用于汉语研究的若干思考. 语言教学与研究, (4), 2-11. [28] 张庆林, 邱江. (2007). 思维心理学. 重庆: 西南师范大学出版社. [29] 赵婧超. (2016). 汉语隐喻义与本义加工时程差异的研究. 陕西师范大学硕士学位论文. [30] 钟毅平, 周海波, 周路平, 陈芸, 范伟. (2011).显性度对隐喻加工的影响:事件相关电位研究.心理科学, 34(3), 527-531. [31] Al-Azary, H., & Buchanan, L. (2017). Novel metaphor comprehension: Semantic neighbourhood density interacts with concreteness.Memory & Cognition, 45(2), 296-307. [32] Al-Azary, H., & Katz, A (2015). Novel metaphor comprehension: Topic concreteness, semantic neighbourhooddensity, and directionality. Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society: Chicago [33] Al-Azary, H., & Katz, A. (2020). Do metaphorical sharks bite? Simulation and abstraction in metaphor processing.Memory & Cognition, 2(11), 1-14. [34] Al-Azary H., Gagné C., & Spalding-Hhomas L. (2021). Flute birds and creamy skies: The metaphor interference effect in modifier-noun phrases.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(2), 175-181. [35] Baird, S. (2014). The role of working memory and divided attentionin metaphor interpretation.Journal of Psycholinguist Research, (43), 555-568. [36] Bowdle, B., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor.Psychological Review, 112(1), 193-216. [37] Brdar M., Brdar-Szabo R., & Gradecak T. (2021). A note on the career of metaphorical domains: On the role of the XYZ constructions in metaphorical transfer reversal.Jezikoslovlje, 22(2), 339-372. [38] Bruhn, M. (2018). Target first on “bidirectionality and metaphor”.Poetics Today, 39(4), 703-733. [39] Campbell, J., & Katz, A. (2006). On reversing the topics and vehicles of metaphor.Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 1-22. [40] Chiappe D., Kennedy J., & Smykowski T. (2003). Reversibility, aptness, and the conventionality of metaphors and similes.Metaphor and Symbol, 18(2), 85-105. [41] Chiappe, DanL., Kennedy, John, M. (1999). Aptness predicts preference for metaphors or similes, as well as recall bias.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 668-676. [42] Chouinard B.,Volden J., Hollinger J., & Cummine J.(2019). Spokenmetaphor comprehension: Evaluation using the metaphor interferenceeffect.Discourse Processes, 56(3), 270-287. [43] Clark, H., & Lucy, P. (1975). Understanding what is meant fom what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14(15), 56-72. [44] Gentner, D. (1987). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science, (7), 155-170. [45] Gentner D.,& Bowdle, B. (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [46] Gentner, D., & Wolff, P. (1997). Alignment in the processing of metaphor.Journal of Memory and Language, 37(3), 331-355. [47] Gil, D., & Shen, Y. (2021). Metaphors: The evolutionary journey from bidirectionality to unidirectionality.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-biological Sciences, 376(1824), 1-7. [48] Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language.Language in Society, 34(2), 307-310. [49] Glucksberg, S., & Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 92-96. [50] Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity.Psychological Review, 97(1), 3-18. [51] Glucksberg S., Gildea P., & Bookin H. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 85-98. [52] Glucksberg S., McGlone M., & Manfredi D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension.Journal of Memory and Language, 36(1), 50-67. [53] Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [54] Goldberg, E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [55] Harati P., Westbury C., Kiaee M., Harati P., Westbury C., et al. (2021). Evaluating the predication model of metaphor comprehension: Using word2vec to model best/worst quality judgments of 622 novel metaphors.Behavior Research Methods, 53(5), 2214-2225. [56] Hermann I., Haser V., van Elst L., Ebert D., Müller-Feldmeth D., et al. (2013). Automatic metaphor processing inadults with asperger syndrome: A metaphor interference effect task.European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 263(2), 177-187. [57] Hijazo-Gaseon A.,T. Cadiemo,L. Tharetxe-Antufano. (2016). Learning the placement caused motion construction in 1.2 Spanish [A]. In S. de Knop & G. Gilquin (eds.). Applied Construction G rammar[C] Berlin / Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. [58] Holyoak, K., & Stamenković, D. (2018). Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence.Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 641-671. [59] Ikuta M., Miwa K., Ikuta M., & Miwa K. (2021). Structure mapping in second-language metaphor processing.Metaphor and Symbol, 36(4), 288-310. [60] Jones, L., & Estes, Z. (2006). Roosters, Robins, and Alarm Clocks: Aptness and conventionality in metaphor comprehension.Journal of Memory and Language, 55(1), 18-32. [61] Jones, L., Estes, Z. (2005). Metaphor comprehension as attributive categorization.Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 110-124. [62] Karolina R., Anna P., Rob H., & van D. (2018). On understanding creative language: The late positive complex and novel metaphor comprehension.Brain Research, 1678, 231-244. [63] Kasirer, A., & Mashal, N. (2016). Comprehension and generation of metaphors by children with autism spectrum disorder.Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, (32), 53-63. [64] Katz, A., & Al-Azary, H. (2017). Principles that promote bidirectionality in verbal metaphor.Poetics Today, 38(1), 35-59. [65] Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(2), 257-66. [66] Lu, X., & Pritchard, T. (2021). Metaphoric interpretation comparison or categorisation?International Review of Pragmatics, 13(2), 287-314. [67] McGlone, M., & Manfredi, D. (2001). Topic-vehicle interaction in metaphor comprehension.Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1209-1219. [68] Nap-Kolhoff , E. (2017). The development of Duteh object-naming constnuctions in bilingual Turkish-Dutch children receiving low amounts of Dutch language input [A . In 1 Evers-Vemeul & E. Tribushinina (eds.). Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Language Teaching]. Boston/Berlin：Walter de Gruyter. [69] Pambuccian F., Raney G., Pambuccian F., & Raney G. (2021). A simile is (like) a metaphor: Comparing metaphor and simile processing across the familiarity spectrum.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale, 75(2), 182-188. [70] Porat, R., & Shen, Y. (2017). Metaphor: The journey from bidirectionality to unidirectionality.Poetics Today, 38(1), 123-140. [71] Rai, S., & Chakraverty, S. (2020). A survey on computational metaphor processing.Acm Computing Surveys, 53(2), 24:1-37. [72] Roncero, C., & Almeida, R. (2015).Semantic properties, aptness, familiarity, conventionality, and interpretive diversity scores for 84 metaphors and similes.Behavior Research Methods, 47(3), 800-812. [73] Roncero C., de Almeida R., Pissani L., Patalas I., Roncero C., et al. (2021). A metaphor is not like a simile: Reading-time evidence for distinct interpretations for negated tropes.Metaphor and Symbol, 36(2), 85-98. [74] Rubio-fernandez P., Geurts B., Cummins C. (2017). Is an apple like a fruit? A study on comparison and categorisation statements.Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 8(2), 367-390. [75] Searle, R. (1993). Metaphor. In A. Ortony(ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. [76] Thibodeau P., Sikos L., & Durgin F. (2018). Are subjective ratings of metaphors a red herring? The big two dimensions of metaphoric sentences.Behavior Research Methods, 50(2), 759-772. [77] Wearing, C.(2014). Interpreting novel metaphors.International Review of Prag-matics, 6, 78-102. [78] Wolff, P., & Gentner, D. (2000). Evidence for role-neutral initial processing of metaphors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(2), 529-541. [79] Wolff, P., & Gentner, D. (2011). Structure-mapping in metaphor comprehension.Cognitive Science, 35(8), 1456-1488.
