The impact of appearance and postural congruency on sense of ownership and agency in virtual hand illusion
MA Ke1, HUANG Huang2
1 Faculty of Psychology,Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715; 2 Prospect College,Chongqing College of Mobile Communication,Chongqing 401520
麻珂, 黄煌. 虚拟手错觉中外表与朝向一致性对身体拥有感和施动感的影响[J]. 心理研究, 2024, 17(3): 215-224.
MA Ke, HUANG Huang. The impact of appearance and postural congruency on sense of ownership and agency in virtual hand illusion. Psychological Research, 2024, 17(3): 215-224.
[1] 马家俊, 魏坤琳, 陈立翰. (2015). 施动感研究的意向捆绑范式述评.心理科学, 38(2), 506-510. [2] 麻珂. (2021). 虚拟手错觉的跨文化研究:以中国和荷兰被试为例.心理研究, 14(3), 227-235. [3] 田昊月, 李力红, 徐喆, 李飞. (2018). 最小自我中的施动感.心理科学进展, 26(5), 872-885. [4] 薛琦, 陆爱桃, 曲星羽, 刘楚麒, 李美荣, 张丽芬. (2018). 识脸错觉与橡胶手错觉下的身份认同:基于内隐联想测验的证据.心理研究, 11(3), 250-260. [5] 周爱保, 朱婧, 夏瑞雪, 李世峰, 徐科朋, 张荣华等. (2013). 我观故我在? 从橡胶手错觉对自我身体所有权的探讨.心理科学, 36(6), 50-54. [6] 张静, 李恒威. (2016). 自我表征的可塑性:基于橡胶手错觉的研究.心理科学, 39(2), 299-304. [7] 张静, 陈巍. (2016). 身体意象可塑吗? 同步性和距离参照系对身体拥有感的影响.心理学报, 48(8), 933-945. [8] 张淼, 吴迪, 李明, 凌懿白, 张明, 赵科. (2018). 主动控制感的测量及认知神经机制.心理科学进展, 26(10), 1787-1793. [9] 赵佩琼, 陈巍, 张静, 平贤洁. (2019). 橡胶手错觉: 拥有感研究的实验范式及其应用.心理科学进展, 27(01), 41-54. [10] Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel' touch that eyes see.Nature, 391, 756. [11] Braun N., Thorne J. D., Hildebrandt H., & Debener S. (2014). Interplay of agency and ownership: The intentional binding and rubber hand illusion paradigm combined.PLoS ONE, 9, e111967. [12] Braun N., Debener S., Spychala N., Bongartz E., Sorös P., Müller H. H. O., Philipsen A. (2018). The senses of agency and ownership: A review.Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 535. [13] Caspar E. A., Cleeremans A., Haggard P. (2015). The relationship between human agency and embodiment.Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 226-236. [14] Ehrsson H. H., Spence C., & Passingham R. E. (2004). That's my hand！ activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb.Science, 305, 875. [15] Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 14-21. [16] Haering, C., & Kiesel, A. (2016). Time perception and the experience of agency.Psychological Research, 80, 286-297. [17] Haggard P., Clark S., & Kalogeras J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness.Nature Neuroscience, 5, 382-385. [18] Haggard, P. (2017). Sense of agency in the human brain.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 197-208. [19] Hohwy, J., & Paton, B. (2010). Explaining away the body: Experiences of supernaturally caused touch and touch on non-hand objects within the rubber hand illusion.PLoS ONE, 5, e9416. [20] Ide, M. (2013). The effect of “anatomical plausibility” of hand angle on? The rubber-hand illusion.Perception, 42(1), 103-111. [21] Jeannerod, M. (2003). The mechanism of self-recognition in humans.Behavioural Brain Research, 142, 1-15. [22] Jensen M., Di Costa S., Haggard P.(2015). Intentional Binding-A Measure of Agency. I M. Overgaard (Red.), Behavioural Methods in Consciousness Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [23] Kalckert, A., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 40. [24] Ma, K., & Hommel, B. (2013). The virtual-hand illusion: Effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 604. [25] Ma, K., & Hommel, B. (2015). Body-ownership for actively operated non-corporeal objects.Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 75-86. [26] Ma K., Hommel B., & Chen H. (2019a). The roles of consistency and exclusivity in perceiving body ownership and agency.Psychological Research, 83, 175-184. [27] Ma K., Hommel B., & Chen H. (2019b). Context-induced contrast and assimilation in explicit and implicit measures of agency. Scientific Reports, 9, 3883. [28] Rohde M., Di Luca M., Ernst M. O. (2011). The rubber hand illusion: Feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS ONE, 6, e21659. [29] Ruess M., Thomaschke R., & Kiesel A. (2018). Intentional binding of visual effects.Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 80(3), 713-722. [30] Sanchez-Vives M. V., Spanlang B., Frisoli A., Bergamasco M., & Slater M. (2010). Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS ONE, 5, e10381. [31] Slater M., Perez-Marcos D., Ehrsson H. H., & Sanchez-Vives M. V. (2008). Towards a digital body: The virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2, 6. [32] Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., & Newen A. (2008a). Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency.Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 219-239. [33] Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., andNewen A. (2008b). I move, therefore I am: A new theoretical framework to investigate agency and ownership.Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 411-424. [34] Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 80-91. [35] Tsakiris M., Carpenter L., James D., & Fotopoulou A. (2010). Hands only illusion: Multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects.Experimental Brain Research, 204, 343-352. [36] Tsakiris, M. (2010). My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership.Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 703-712. [37] Tsakiris M., Tajadura-Jiménez A., & Costantini M. (2011). Just a heartbeat away from one's body: Interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1717), 2470-2476. [38] Tsakiris, M. (2017). The multisensory basis of the self: From body to identity to others.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(4), 597-609. [39] Yuan, Y., & Steed, A. (2010). Is the rubber hand illusion induced by immersive virtual reality? in IEEE Virtual Reality conference, VR 2010. B. Lok, G. Klinker, and R. Nakatsu (eds.). (Waltham, MA: IEEE Computer Soc), 95-102. [40] Zopf R., Polito V., Moore J. W. (2018). Revisiting the link between body and agency: Visual movement congruency enhances intentional binding but is not body-specific. Scientific Report, 8, 196.
