金钱剥夺情境状态对利他行为的影响

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2024.02.003

心理研究

2024, Vol. 17

Issue (2): 113-120 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2024.02.003

基础研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

金钱剥夺情境状态对利他行为的影响

谢思祎, 史冰

中山大学心理系,广州 510006

The promotion of situational financial deprivation on prosocial behavior

XIE Siyi, SHI Bing

Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (967 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本研究通过4个实验来探讨金钱剥夺的情境状态对利他行为的影响及利他行为的情境和形式效应。结果发现：（1）金钱剥夺情境下,个体做出更多利他行为,且这种行为变化是通过护面子意识而不是争面子意识的中介作用;（2）金钱剥夺个体在公开情境下会做出更多利他行为,而私人情境下该效应减弱;（3）金钱剥夺个体愿意做出更多非金钱的利他形式,而在金钱形式下该效应减弱。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	谢思祎
	史冰

关键词 ：金钱剥夺, 利他行为, 护面子意识, 公开情境, 争面子意识

基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目（71872189）、广东省自然科学基金面上项目（2019A1515012228）

通讯作者: 史冰,女,副教授,博士生导师。Email：shbing@mail.sysu.edu.cn

引用本文:

谢思祎, 史冰. 金钱剥夺情境状态对利他行为的影响[J]. 心理研究, 2024, 17(2): 113-120.
XIE Siyi, SHI Bing. The promotion of situational financial deprivation on prosocial behavior. Psychological Research, 2024, 17(2): 113-120.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2024.02.003 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2024/V17/I2/113

[1] 丁倩, 唐云, 魏华, 张永欣, 周宗奎. (2018). 相对剥夺感与大学生网络游戏成瘾的关系:一个有调节的中介模型,心理学报, 50(9), 117-126.
[2] 费定舟, 钱东海, 黄旭辰. (2016). 利他行为的自我控制过程模型: 自我损耗下的道德情绪的正向作用.心理学报, 48(9), 1175-1183.
[3] 李静, 郭永玉. (2010). 收入与幸福的关系及其现实意义.心理科学进展, 18(7), 1073-1080.
[4] 施卓敏, 范丽洁, 叶锦锋. (2012). 中国人的脸面观及其对消费者解读奢侈品广告的影响研究.南开管理评论, 15(1), 151-160.
[5] 施卓敏, 吴路芳, 邝灶英. (2014). 面子意识如何逆转自私行为?社会价值取向对生态消费的影响.营销科学学报, 10, 59-81.
[6] 施卓敏, 郑婉怡. (2017). 面子文化中消费者生态产品偏好的眼动研究.管理世界, 9, 129-140.
[7] 于春玲, 朱晓冬, 王霞, 张一飞. (2019). 面子意识与绿色产品购买意向:使用情境和价格相对水平的调节作用.管理评论, 31(11), 139-146.
[8] 翟学伟. (2004). 人情、面子与权力的再生产:情理社会中的社会交换方式.社会学研究, 5, 48-57.
[9] 张新安 (2012). 中国人的面子观与炫耀性奢侈品消费行为,营销科学学报, 8(1), 76-94.
[10] 郑晓莹, 彭泗清, 彭璐珞. (2015). “达”则兼济天下?社会比较对亲社会行为的影响及心理机制.心理学报, 47(2), 243-250.
[11] Allard, T., & White, K. (2015). Cross-domain effects of guilt on desire for self-improvement products. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 401-419.
[12] Ames D., Flynn F., Reagans R., & Amanatullah E. (2006). Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1123-1137.
[13] Ariely D., Bracha A., & Meier S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially.American Economic Review, 99, 544-555.
[14] Aslani S., Ramirez-Marin J., Brett J., Yao J., et al. (2016). Dignity, ace, and honor cultures: A study of negotiation strategy and outcomes in three cultures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 1178-1201.
[15] Bachar E., Latzer Y., Canetti L., et al. (2010). Rejection of life in anorexic and bulimic patients. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 43-48.
[16] Barclay, P. (2004). Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Evolution & Human Behavior, 25, 209-220.
[17] Barclay, P., & Willer, R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 749-753.
[18] Böhm, R.,& Regner, T. (2013). Charitable giving among females and males: An empirical test of the competitive altruism hypothesis. Journal of Bioeconomics, 15, 251-267.
[19] Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2012). Conspicuous generosity.Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1131-1143.
[20] Fehrler, S., & Przepiorka, W. (2013). Charitable giving as a signal of trustworthiness: Disentangling the signaling benefits of altruistic acts.Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 139-145.
[21] Greve, F. & Newspapers, M. C. (2006). America’s poor are its most generous giver.Journal of Library Science in China, 2, 758-765.
[22] Griskevicius V., Tybur J. M., & Bergh, B. V. D. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 392-404.
[23] Hardy, C. L., & Van, V. M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402-1413.
[24] Hasford J., Kidwell B., & Lopez K. V. (2017). Happy wife, happy life: Food choices in romantic relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 1238-1256.
[25] Hepper E. G., Sedikides C., & Huajian C. (2013). Self-enhancement and self-protection strategies in China: Cultural expressions of a fundamental human motive. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 5-23.
[26] Hoffman E., McCabe K., & Smith V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games.The American Economic Review, 86, 653-660.
[27] Holland, J., Silva, A. S. & Mace, R. (2012). Lost letter measure of variation in altruistic behaviour in 20 neighbourhoods. Plos One, 7, 1-4.
[28] Hu, H. C. (1944). The Chinese concepts of “face”. American Anthropologist, 46, 45-64.
[29] Hughes A., Wilkens T., Wildemuth B. M., & Marchionini G. (2003). Text or pictures? An eyetracking study of how people view digital video surrogates.International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, 271-280.
[30] Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game.American Journal of Sociology, 92, 944-974.
[31] Kube S., Maréchal M. A., & Puppe C. (2012). The currency of reciprocity: Gift exchange in the workplace. American Economic Review, 102, 1644-1662.
[32] Mandel N., Petrova P. K., & Cialdini R. B. (2006). Image of success and preference for luxury brands.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 57-69.
[33] Mandel N., Rucker D. D., Levav J., & Galinsky A. D. (2017). The compensatory consumer behavior model: How self-discrepancies drive consumer behavior.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27, 133-146.
[34] Meng X. L., Rosenthal R., & Rubin D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172-175.
[35] Michael D., Christopher B., & Alex W. (2015). A social rank explanation of how money influences health.Health Psychology Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology American Psychological Association, 34, 222-230.
[36] Piff P. K., Kraus M. W., Stéphane C. T.,Bonnie H. C., & Dacher K. (2010). Having less,giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771-784.
[37] Preacher K. J., Rucker D. D., & Hayes A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory,methods,and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
[38] Roux C., Goldsmith K., & Bonezzi A. (2015). On the psychology of scarcity: When reminders of resource scarcity promote selfish (and generous) behavior.Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 615-631.
[39] Rucker D. D., Dubois D., & Galinsky A. D. (2011). Generous paupers and stingy princes: Power drives consumer spending on self versus others.Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 1015-1029.
[40] Scott, G. G., & Hand, C. J. (2016). Motivation determines Facebook viewing strategy.Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 267-280.
[41] Sharma, E., & Alter, A. L. (2012). Financial deprivation prompts consumers to seek scarce goods.Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 545-560.
[42] Sharma E., Mazar N., Alter A. L., & Ariely D. (2014). Financial deprivation selectively shifts moral standards and compromises moral decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123, 90-100.
[43] Tesser, A. (2001). On the plasticity of self-defense.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 66-69.
[44] Vohs K. D., Mead N. L., & Goode M. R. (2006), The psychological consequences of money.Science, 314, 1154-1156.
[45] Willer, R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem.American Sociological Review, 74, 23-43.
[46] Wilson, E. O. (1975). Some central problems of sociobiology. Social Science Information, 14, 5-18.