工作记忆、靶线索间隔时间对事件性前瞻记忆的影响

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.03.004

心理研究

2023, Vol. 16

Issue (3): 224-232 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.03.004

基础研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

工作记忆、靶线索间隔时间对事件性前瞻记忆的影响

孙佳禾, 何文广

曲阜师范大学心理学院,曲阜 273165

The impaction of working memory and cue-target interval on event-based prospective memory

Sun Jiahe, HE Wenguang

School of Psychology, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (890 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要采用双重任务研究范式,系统考察了不同类型的工作记忆负荷、靶线索间隔时间对事件性前瞻记忆（EBPM）两成分（前瞻成分、回溯成分）的影响。结果显示：工作记忆负荷对EBPM有显著影响,具体表现为高负荷工作记忆条件下EBPM成绩差于低工作记忆负荷;靶线索间隔时间对EBPM有显著影响,长时间间隔条件下被试的作业表现较差,而且间隔时间对EBPM两成分的影响没有受到工作记忆任务类型的影响;较之于前瞻成分,回溯成分更容易受到工作记忆负荷的影响;不同工作记忆类型对前瞻记忆两成分任务有不同影响,回溯成分任务更容易受客体工作记忆的影响。综合来看,研究结果支持了“预备注意加工和记忆加工”理论。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	孙佳禾
	何文广

关键词 ：事件性前瞻记忆, 工作记忆, 延时间隔, 前瞻成分, 回溯成分

基金资助:山东省自然科学基金（ZR2019MC048）、山东省青年科技创新团队（2019RWF005）项目

通讯作者: 何文广,男,教授,博士生导师。Email：hewg@qfnu.edu.cn

引用本文:

孙佳禾, 何文广. 工作记忆、靶线索间隔时间对事件性前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理研究, 2023, 16(3): 224-232.
Sun Jiahe, HE Wenguang. The impaction of working memory and cue-target interval on event-based prospective memory. Psychological Research, 2023, 16(3): 224-232.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.03.004 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2023/V16/I3/224

[1] 陈骞, 马志璇, 王明怡. (2019). 执行功能对前瞻记忆影响的认知机制. 心理研究, (05), 401-407+424.
[2] 陈幼珍. (2010). 前瞻记忆的生理机制研究综述.长江师范学院学报, 26(1), 95-99.
[3] 傅国庆, 李开, 钱进, 蒋孟孟. (2021). 认知负荷与颜色语义联想词的启动对基于事件的前瞻记忆的影响.心理学进展, (03).
[4] 郭云飞, 干加裙, 张哲, 黄婷红, 陈幼贞. (2016). 编码方式、认知负荷和线索数量对前瞻记忆的影响.心理科学, 39(5), 1058-1063.
[5] 胡彬, 冯成志. (2013). 前瞻记忆类型差异及动机与任务序列对前瞻记忆的影响.心理学报, 45(9), 944-960.
[6] 张利增, 权朝鲁, 李寿欣. (2010). 提示对事件的前瞻记忆的影响的研究.心理科学, 33(6), 1405-1407.
[7] Anderson, F., & McDaniel, M. (2019). Retrieval in prospective memory: Multiple processes or just delay? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 2197-2207.
[8] Anderson F., Rummel J., & McDaniel M. (2018). Proceeding with care for successful prospective memory: Do we delay ongoing responding or actively monitor for cues?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1036-1050.
[9] Brewer G., Knight J. B., Marsh R. L., & Unsworth N. (2010). Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from multiple processes supporting cue detection.Memory and Cogntion, 38(3), 304-311.
[10] Cona G., Bisiacchi P., Sartori G., & Scarpazza C. (2016). Effects of cue focality on the neural mechanisms of prospective memory: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.Scientific Reports, 6.
[11] Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 16(4), 717-726.
[12] Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 286-290.
[13] Kubik V., Missier F. D., & Mäntylä T. (2020). Spatial ability contributes to memory for delayed intentions.Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5.
[14] Mahy, C. E. V., & Moses, L. J. (2011). Executive functioning and prospective memory in young children.Cognitive Development, 26, 269-281.
[15] Mahy, C.E.V., & Moses, L.J. (2015). The effect of retention interval task difficulty on young children's prospective memory: Testing the intention monitoring hypothesis. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 742-758.
[16] Momennejad I., Lewis-Peacock J., & Lewis R. L. (2020). Rational use of episodic and working memory: A normative account of prospective memory.Neuropsychologia.
[17] Moyes J., Sari-Sarraf N., & Gilbert S. (2019). Characterising monitoring processes in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from pupillometry.Cognition, 184, 83-95.
[18] O'Connor A., Campbell K., & Mahy C. E. (2020). Younger and older adults' prospective memory: The role of delay task difficulty.Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 28, 184-200.
[19] O'Rear, A. E., & Radvansky, G. (2019). Location-based prospective memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 491-507.
[20] Penningroth S. L., Scott W. D., & Freuen M. (2011). Social motivation in prospective memory: Higher importance ratings and reported performance rates for social tasks.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(1), 3-11.
[21] Rummel J., Smeekens B. A., & Kane M. J. (2017). Dealing with prospective memory demands while performing an ongoing task: Shared processing, increased on-task focus, or both?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1047-1062.
[22] Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(4), 756-777.
[23] Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2005). The effects of working memory resource availability on prospective memory: A formal modeling approach.Experimental Psychology, 52, 243-256.
[24] Unsworth N., Schrock J. C., & Engle R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 1302-1321.
[25] Walter, S., & Meier, B. (2017). Social importance enhances prospective memory: Evidence from an event-based task. Memory, 25, 777-783.
[26] West R., Bowry R., & Krompinger J. (2006). The effects of working memory demands on the neural correlates of prospective memory.Neuropsychologia, 44(2), 197-207.