人类择偶复制现象的性别差异探析

doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.02.010

心理研究

2022, Vol. 15

Issue (2): 160-166 DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.02.010

应用研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

人类择偶复制现象的性别差异探析

潘思存, 黄希庭

西南大学心理学部,西南大学心理学与社会发展研究中心,重庆 400715

Analysis of the gender difference in human mate choice copying

PAN Sicun, HUANG Xiting

Faculty of Psychology, Research Center of Psychology and Social Development, Southwest University,Chongqing 400715

摘要
图/表
参考文献(44)
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要择偶复制是一种非独立的择偶方式,人类通过复制他人的择偶行为以节省选择成本获得择偶优势。许多研究发现女性相对于男性更容易采用择偶复制策略。这可能是个体社会适应机制进化的结果。择偶复制策略可以降低女性高昂的成本与风险,而男性采用择偶复制策略意义不大,且会加剧择偶过程中的性内竞争。但婚姻制度与社会文化差异也可能会影响人类社会整体的择偶复制性别差异。今后需要继续从神经机制与文化角度对人类择偶复制现象进行研究以建立更合理有效的理论模型。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	潘思存
	黄希庭

关键词 ：择偶复制, 性别差异, 社会适应

通讯作者: 黄希庭,男,教授,博士生导师。Email：xthuang@swu.edu.cn

引用本文:

潘思存, 黄希庭. 人类择偶复制现象的性别差异探析[J]. 心理研究, 2022, 15(2): 160-166.
PAN Sicun, HUANG Xiting. Analysis of the gender difference in human mate choice copying. Psychological Research, 2022, 15(2): 160-166.

链接本文:

http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.02.010 或 http://xlyj.magtech.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V15/I2/160

[1] 乐国安, 陈浩, 张彦彦. (2005). 进化心理学择偶心理机制假设的跨文化检验——以天津、Boston两地征婚启事的内容分析为例.心理学报, 37(4), 561-568.
[2] 梁晓燕, 施露露, 陈永香. (2015). 认知方式与性别对择偶复制的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(3), 521-524. 唐利平, 黄希庭. 1(3), 43-48.
[3] 庄锦英, 徐璟, 张森, 余菲. (2012). 择偶复制:一种适应性的性选择策略.心理科学进展, 20(10), 1672-1678.
[4] Amano, Y., & Wakao, Y. (2021). Women's sensitivity to men's past relationships: Reliable information use for mate-choice copying in humans.Evolutionary Psychological Science, 7, 1-13.
[5] Anderson, R. C., & Surbey, M. K. (2020). Human mate copying as a form of nonindependent mate selection: Findings and considerations.Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 173-196.
[6] Anderson R. C., Surbey M. K., & Mitchell D. A. (2018). Mate copying is moderated by relationship recency and potentially by breakup responsibility.Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4(3), 301-311.
[7] Bierbach D., Kronmarck C., Hennige-Schulz C., Stadler S., & Plath M. (2011). Sperm competition risk affects male mate choice copying.Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(9), 1699-1707.
[8] Bowers R. I., Place S. S., Todd P. M., Penke L., & Asendorpf J. B. (2012). Generalization in mate-choice copying in humans.Behavioral Ecology, 23(1), 112-124.
[9] Buss, D. M., & Foley, P. (2020). Mating and marketing.Journal of Business Research, 120, 492-497.
[10] Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating.Psychological Review, 100(2), 204-232.
[11] Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations.Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77-110.
[12] Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment.Evolutionary Psychology, 6(1), 147470490800600116.
[13] Davies A. D., Lewis Z., & Dougherty L. R. (2020). A meta-analysis of factors influencing the strength of mate-choice copying in animals.Behavioral Ecology, 31(6), 1279-1290.
[14] Dugatkin, L. A., & Godin, J.-G. J. (1992). Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.Series B: Biological Sciences, 249(1325), 179-184.
[15] Fitzpatrick, C. L., & Servedio, M. R. (2018). The evolution of male mate choice and female ornamentation: A review of mathematical models.Current Zoology, 64(3), 323-333.
[16] Fowler-Finn K. D., Sullivan-Beckers L., Runck A. M., & Hebets E. A. (2015). The complexities of female mate choice and male polymorphisms: Elucidating the role of genetics, age, and mate-choice copying.Current Zoology, 61(6), 1015-1035.
[17] Frommen J. G., Rahn A. K., Schroth S. H., Waltschyk N., & Bakker T. C. (2009). Mate-choice copying when both sexes face high costs of reproduction.Evolutionary Ecology, 23(3), 435-446.
[18] Gouda-Vossos A., Nakagawa S., Dixson B. J., & Brooks R. C. (2018). Mate choice copying in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 4(4), 364-386. Hill, S. E., & Buss, D. M.(5), 635-647.
[19] Kavaliers M., Matta R., & Choleris E. (2017). Mate-choice copying, social information processing, and the roles of oxytocin.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 72, 232-242.
[20] Little A. C., Burriss R. P., Jones B. C., DeBruine L. M., & Caldwell C. A. (2008). Social influence in human face preference: Men and women are influenced more for long-term than short-term attractiveness decisions.Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(2), 140-146.
[21] Moran, J. B., & Wade, T. J. (2019). Perceptions of a mismatched couple: The role of attractiveness on mate poaching and copying. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 16(1), 94-99.
[22] Parker, G. A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects.Biological Reviews, 45(4), 525-567.
[23] Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113.
[24] Pruett-Jones, S. (1992). Independent versus nonindependent mate choice: Do females copy each other?The American Naturalist, 140(6), 1000-1009.
[25] Rodeheffer C. D., Proffitt Leyva R. P., & Hill S. E. (2016). Attractive female romantic partners provide a proxy for unobservable male qualities: The when and why behind human female mate choice copying.Evolutionary Psychology, 14(2), 1474704916652144.
[26] Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85-104.
[27] Schmitt, D. P. (2004). Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: The effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person's partner.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 560-584.
[28] Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 894-917.
[29] Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2007). Adaptation to sperm competition in humans.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(1), 47-50.
[30] Street S. E., Morgan T. J., Thornton A., Brown G. R., Laland K. N., & Cross C. P. (2018). Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning.Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1-7.
[31] Taimre L., Anderson R. C., & Paisley O. (2020). Female mate copying explored: An inconsistent effect.Current Psychology, 1-10.
[32] Tekin, C., & Anderson, R. C. (2021). Non-independent mate choice in humans: An investigation of online mate choice copying and sex differences.Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1-8.
[33] Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In‘Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man'.(Ed. B. Campbell.) pp. 136-179. Aldinc: Chicago, 13(2).
[34] Tsouvelas G., Kalaitzaki A., & Vakirtzis A. (2018). Nonindependent mate choice: The first study with real-life couples in a Greek sample.Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 1(2), 22-30.
[35] Vakirtzis, A., & Roberts, S. C. (2009). Mate choice copying and mate quality bias: Different processes, different species.Behavioral Ecology, 20(4), 908-911.
[36] Vakirtzis, A., & Roberts, S. C. (2012). Do women really like taken men? Results from a large questionnaire study.Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(1), 50-65.
[37] Wang D., Zhou S., Kong X., Han D., Liu Y., Sun L.,... Hu Y. (2021). The influence of model quality on self-other mate choice copying.Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110481.
[38] Waynforth, D. (2007). Mate choice copying in humans.Human Nature, 18(3), 264-271.
[39] Westneat D. F., Walters A., McCarthy T. M., Hatch M. I., & Hein W. K. (2000). Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice.Animal Behaviour, 59(3), 467-476.
[40] Witte K., Kniel N., & Kureck I. M. (2015). Mate-choice copying: Status quo and where to go.Current Zoology, 61(6), 1073-1081.
[41] Witte, K., & Ueding, K. (2003). Sailfin molly females (Poecilia latipinna) copy the rejection of a male.Behavioral Ecology, 14(3), 389-395.
[42] Xu L., Becker B., Luo R., Zheng X., Zhao W., Zhang Q., & Kendrick K. M. (2020). Oxytocin amplifies sex differences in human mate choice.Psychoneuroendocrinology, 112, 104483.
[43] Zhuang J.-Y., Ji X., Zhao Z., Fan M., & Li N. P. (2017). The neural basis of human female mate copying: An empathy-based social learning process.Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(6), 779-788.
[44] Zhuang J.-Y., Xie J., Li P., Fan M., & Bode S. (2021). Neural profiles of observing acceptance and rejection decisions in human mate choice copying.NeuroImage, 233, 117929.